Yellow Warbler

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sea Loch. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – loch. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at loch – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know I've moved your post from AN to ANI -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 09:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be confused about what that deletion log means. Kendall-K1 created the account in July 2011 and has had control of it since. Two other users created the page User:Kendall-K1. Kendall-K1 did not want the page and requested the page be deleted. JohnCD deleted it the first time it happened and I deleted it the second time. JohnCD nor I took control of the account, we just deleted the page. The account was not renamed or deleted, just the userpage. Kendall-K1 is alive and well and has control of the account. - GB fan 14:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So it's the same user, reinstating the name? Not a new user?

No one has reinstated the name. The account was created in July 2011 and has never been deleted. The userpage and the account while linked are different. The account is what you log into. The only way an account can be deleted is to have a developer delete it (that never happens). The userpage is just a page like an article. It can be deleted and restored by any admin but does not effect who has control of the account. I could delete your userpage (User:Springchickensoup) and you would still have complete access to your account, I would not gain access to your account. - GB fan 15:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry for being thick. :) {Springchickensoup (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

No problem. Sometimes things on here are not as straight forward as they should be. - GB fan 15:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having noticed the change you made in the title of the above article, I have now reverted back to the original title. While the title you used may be the correct, full, legal name of the company, Wikipedia policy is to use the common names by which things are referred to for article titles. You can see the relevant policy at WP:UCRN. The company itself generally refers to itself as simply "Western Ferries" in its website, branding etc., and this is also how they are normally referred to in news sources as well. In any case, your title would have unsatisfactory as it contained the unusual capitalisation of "LTD". I hope you'll understand why your change wasn't helpful in this instance. Jellyman (talk) 09:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for the move you also performed with Argyll Ferries. Jellyman (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, seems the opposite to most naming policies. {Springchickensoup (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

Please stop filling in the "district" parameter in the UK place infobox for locations in Scotland. The information presented relates to current administrative areas, and this line is only relevant to the system of county and district councils in parts of England. Scotland has not had districts since the 1990s. This line should be left blank, and not filled in with old county names or anything else. Jellyman (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct the over-precise distances you've been adding for distances from London and Edinburgh in Dunoon and similar articles. Whole miles is the appropriate level of detail, not to the nearest 17.6 yards! And take out the references, which are very rarely needed in infoboxes. Infoboxes should only include information which is already in the article, so it would be appropriate to add a sentence like " XXX is yy miles North West of Edinburgh, as the crow flies." with a good reference. (Not just a bare URL). The "North West" etc can also go into the infobox - there's a field called "edinburgh_direction" to use, as in the Featured Article Altrincham. (

I'm not convinced that it's appropriate to add London distance, but have reread a bit which I thought said not to and changed my mind. Shamingly I can't find any UK populated places outside England in the list of Featured Articles at Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Geography_and_places, which is my usual way to check what's good style if the documentation is ambiguous - umpteen articles within Greater Manchester or Lincolnshire, a couple on islands like Skye, but no settlements north of Blyth, Northumberland. I'll reinstate that distance, which I deleted from Dunoon. PamD 18:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but this is just nonsense, the distance from anywhere to anywhere else is a fact, whether one of the places is in Scotland or both in England. As for being over-precise, again just nonsense, no distance on Wikipedia is precise as the points the measurements are taken from are not fixed point. {SCS 22:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)}

On several occasions today you have not properly signed comments that you made on talk pages. When I have attempted to correct these errors on article talk pages you have then returned to remove these details. You can find advice about this on WP:SIGNHERE. It is not appropriate for you to avoid putting your details on talk pages, and when corrections are applied to provide these details you should not be removing them. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]