How Can We Help?
You are here:
< Back
Content deleted Content added
Selket (talk | contribs)
few questions
Daniel Case (talk | contribs)
decline unblock
Line 1: Line 1:


{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Rencourt | reason=My initial reason for editing was the initial post about the hotel also had a link for the SAVE the waldo group that has since been deleted, by them or wikipedia staff. That group had advertised that they had created the page on wikipedia and had initially had info that supported their effort and not just the facts about the building. My belief was that with the hot issue it is in our community if a page was to be built regarding the building that both positive and negative were to be available for consideration as that is how people become educated of pros and cons. SINCE this has all began the page has been reduced to one sentence that is nothing more than a factual statement about the structures building date and the architect. I have no issue with that and no reason to edit it in any way. I agree with you. If this is the rules of Wikipedia regarding groups, it was never intended to be advertising but education about the situation. THE REVIVE group link has been removed as well as ours. I have no intention or desire to further edit the page. I have been a reader of Wikipedia for years. I have never felt a need to edit, and I may never again in the future. I just dont want my entire household to be blocked by IP incase myself, or one of my family members intends to do so in the future. I'm making my user name reflect my real name, so I have no intention to behave inappropriately. | decline=No response to below query in three days. — [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)}}

{{unblock-spamun|Rencourt|My initial reason for editing was the initial post about the hotel also had a link for the SAVE the waldo group that has since been deleted, by them or wikipedia staff. That group had advertised that they had created the page on wikipedia and had initially had info that supported their effort and not just the facts about the building. My belief was that with the hot issue it is in our community if a page was to be built regarding the building that both positive and negative were to be available for consideration as that is how people become educated of pros and cons. SINCE this has all began the page has been reduced to one sentence that is nothing more than a factual statement about the structures building date and the architect. I have no issue with that and no reason to edit it in any way. I agree with you. If this is the rules of Wikipedia regarding groups, it was never intended to be advertising but education about the situation. THE REVIVE group link has been removed as well as ours. I have no intention or desire to further edit the page. I have been a reader of Wikipedia for years. I have never felt a need to edit, and I may never again in the future. I just dont want my entire household to be blocked by IP incase myself, or one of my family members intends to do so in the future. I'm making my user name reflect my real name, so I have no intention to behave inappropriately.}}


Here are a few key questions:
Here are a few key questions:

Revision as of 15:41, 16 July 2012

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Demothewaldo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Requested username:

Rencourt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My initial reason for editing was the initial post about the hotel also had a link for the SAVE the waldo group that has since been deleted, by them or wikipedia staff. That group had advertised that they had created the page on wikipedia and had initially had info that supported their effort and not just the facts about the building. My belief was that with the hot issue it is in our community if a page was to be built regarding the building that both positive and negative were to be available for consideration as that is how people become educated of pros and cons. SINCE this has all began the page has been reduced to one sentence that is nothing more than a factual statement about the structures building date and the architect. I have no issue with that and no reason to edit it in any way. I agree with you. If this is the rules of Wikipedia regarding groups, it was never intended to be advertising but education about the situation. THE REVIVE group link has been removed as well as ours. I have no intention or desire to further edit the page. I have been a reader of Wikipedia for years. I have never felt a need to edit, and I may never again in the future. I just dont want my entire household to be blocked by IP incase myself, or one of my family members intends to do so in the future. I'm making my user name reflect my real name, so I have no intention to behave inappropriately.

Decline reason:

No response to below query in three days. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. -- Selket Talk 15:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Waldo Hotel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Waldo Hotel was changed by Demothewaldo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867989 on 2012-06-22T17:43:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
What can I do now?
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Template:Z17 Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories
Table of Contents