How Can We Help?
You are here:
< Back
Content deleted Content added
→‎Recent edits: new section
Line 35: Line 35:


''-The the world's first electronic digital computer (John Vincent Atanasoff), ushered in the digital-information age, which has led '''not only to mass computing but to the development of a number of divergent modern technologies such as the Internet'''.'' and following, simply don't have a place here. You can either change the style, or return to the previous version. Your call. - ☣''[[User:Tourbillon|Tourbillon]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Tourbillon|A ?]]</sup> 20:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
''-The the world's first electronic digital computer (John Vincent Atanasoff), ushered in the digital-information age, which has led '''not only to mass computing but to the development of a number of divergent modern technologies such as the Internet'''.'' and following, simply don't have a place here. You can either change the style, or return to the previous version. Your call. - ☣''[[User:Tourbillon|Tourbillon]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Tourbillon|A ?]]</sup> 20:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

== [[John Vincent Atanasoff]] ==

[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if: John Vincent Atanasoff|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[: John Vincent Atanasoff]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:comic sans ms">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 01:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:14, 6 October 2009

Edit summaries and signing comments

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in England, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Working together

I have the impression that you are rather upset with me after our discussions on the talk pages of Bulgaria and Gradeshnitsa tablets. We've been discussing matters for a few days now. I am not trying to make you upset; I am just trying to help improve these articles.

I realize I have removed and changed some text in these articles and that you disagree with my editing actions. This is a normal interaction on Wikipedia. Our task is now to work out our differences to our mutual satisfaction while retaining Wikipedia's encyclopedic neutral, encyclopedic point of view.

I wish to note that I was not the only editor who has removed your edits. From your comments, I do get the impression you think I am someone actively working against you. Working against you is not my intent - I am trying to work with you. I want to find the proper place, and way, to address your concerns in Wikipedia. I do not dispute the evidence for possible ancient writing in the region of present-day Bulgaria. I dispute that we have reached the proper place, and proper tone: I think we should not discuss this so prominently in the Bulgaria article without a lot more care.

Some of the work that resulted in part from this discussion was actually productive - there is now a Gradeshnitsa tablets article, and you have found some very useful academic articles about the matter of early writing in the region. We should definitely continue with this productive exercise and expand the Gradeshnitsa tablets article.




Possible connection to User:Lantonov

I found myself in a discussion with Monshuai, and a few day later I find user User:Lantonov take text I wrote in this discussion and use it in an entirely different context in another discussion altogether (see User talk:Lantonov for more I wrote on this). Both users are interested in POVs in connection to Bulgaria. Martijn Faassen (talk) 19:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Your name has been mentioned at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

You are welcome to join the discussion there. EdJohnston (talk) 05:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I really do not think you can pretend to be more experienced by having a longer participation. You may have some excellent experience in being a columnist, but statements in a style, such as Bulgarian scientists have made several important discoveries and inventions that have revolutionized global society.

-The the world's first electronic digital computer (John Vincent Atanasoff), ushered in the digital-information age, which has led not only to mass computing but to the development of a number of divergent modern technologies such as the Internet. and following, simply don't have a place here. You can either change the style, or return to the previous version. Your call. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 20:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John Vincent Atanasoff. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. - Alison 01:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories
Table of Contents