Taxus Baccata

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Han American is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Han American until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --benlisquare_T•C•E 16:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mandarin language. Since you had some involvement with the Mandarin language redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Han Chinese, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please come on the talk page and discuss. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Han Chinese. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Stop edit warring. I am politely asking you to revert you last edit. Your edits are disruptive. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]