Panicum

	Other pastel-colored boxes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of National Popular Consciousness. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. D.S. Lioness (talk) 04:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:War of 1812#Infobox and belligerents, with Spain on the list Rather than removing something you disagree with, you should see whether there is any ongoing debate on the talk page for the article. Next time you find yourself in this scenario, it would be better to check, and if there has been recent discussion, to leave a message there as to what you are going to edit, and why, else it looks like an edit war. Keith H99 (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith H99 thanks for the reminder. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 02:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CanonNi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Evan Kail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm the writer of the Hotdesk draft. This is my 1st ever article and I wanted to know if you could give me a bit more insight on how I can get it approved.

Thank you for your assistance!

Best regards, Gerard Gerardch12 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerardch12 there are several issues, but firstly, what is your relationship with the company? If you are an employee, you are required by the terms of use to disclose it by placing the {{paid}} template on your user page. The main issues are:

1. The draft is promotional in tone with many peacock words. Everything should be written neutrally.
2. The draft lacks inline citations, which are needed so that information can be verified. See H:Referencing for beginners for more information.
3. The sources aren't reliable. 2 of the 6 sources are the company's website (and are therefore not independent nor reliable), and the other 4 are about the founder, not the company (and are therefore not significant coverage).

For the draft to be accepted, it needs to meet the general notability guidelines and notability guidelines for companies. HTH, '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CanonNi,

I was reaching out for some guidance after you recently declined my draft for an article about Andy Hopper (Draft:Andy Hopper). I'm hoping you might be able to provide some guidance for better establishing notability. I have a number of other sources discussing Hopper and his election campaigns, but I want to make sure I'm providing sources that add to notability.

From the general notability guidelines, I feel with additional sources, I can establish all five components of notability, but I just want to make sure that it's not an issue of source quality versus number of sources. He has been covered by many professional media outlets in North Texas, including radio and television interviews. Also, I'm wondering what weight, if any campaign endorsements by other already established notable people might have? He has been endorsed by a number of people with national fame in the USA.

Thanks in advance for any feedback or advice you might be able to provide,

TC Texasconservative24 (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]