Hosta

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there! I'm nominating a few or many templates you have created that produce many internal links. You can find it's entry here. I invite you to discuss the nomination there. SWinxy (talk) 05:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PetaPixel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PetaPixel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Locke Cole! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Talk:2023 Nashville school shooting several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2023 Nashville school shooting, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. I meant to say "unilateral hatting" in my revert edit summary but the intent stands. You made a bold hatting, it got reverted. If you consider it gravedancing, please take it to the correct forum instead of edit warring without discussion.. Soni (talk) 06:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When dealing with this amount of opposition, Locke Cole, you’ve got to be whiter than white. You can’t be assuming bad faith, you can’t be edit warring on the talk page. You have to try not to be hostile. You’ve got to be careful. Good luck. starship.paint (exalt) 03:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. —Locke Cole • t • c 20:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Buy Buy Baby (logo).svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. General Ization ^Talk 16:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The SVG is corrupt when rendered at widths < 1000 px (typically how logos are displayed in the encyclopedia). If you can repair it, please contest the deletion and do so. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 16:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@General Ization In the future, please don't jump to CSD. I saw the issue in the tiny thumbnail (the image in the article looked fine on both the Wikipedia app, and on the full desktop site) and believe I've corrected it. I also took the time to add the colors from the prior logo image. Let me know if there's anything else you see wrong. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]