Hosta

Renewable Energy Party

Renewable Energy Party ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:ORG. Could not find indepth coverage except the first hit in gnews. A minor party that existed for 2 years and never gained a seat. LibStar (talk) 04:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing screams non-notable for a party involved in democratic politics than the words regarding its candidates for office,'none of whom were elected'. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are a large number of defunct parties in the navigation template at the bottom of the page. It got more votes than about ten other groups in each state in the election it contested - see Results of the 2016 Australian federal election (Senate). Registered parties are part of the history of Australian politics and there is nowhere sensible for the (non-template) links to go instead. --Scott Davis ^Talk 05:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Results of the 2016 Australian federal election (Senate), I was only able to find one reliable, secondary source that gave this extremely minor party significant coverage, here. I couldn't find anything else, meaning this party fails WP:GNG. Changing my vote to Keep per the sources found by Find bruce below. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Results of the 2016 Australian federal election (Senate) is a sensible option, as it stands the topic is not notable and fails WP:NORG. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep In addition to the source mentioned by Devonian Wombat, there is also crikey.com.au about the party & people involved, Northern Star & each of the sources meet each of the criteria in WP:ORGCRIT. --Find bruce (talk) 03:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]