Everscale moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Everscale, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the article below contains 30 links, among them are such authoritative publications as Forbes, Capital, Cointelegraph etc. Sebirkhan (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Links don't equate to notability, most of the sources are useless for establishing WP:N. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Below are the following articles/news about Everscale:
Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tatianakoffman/2021/07/29/how-a-group-of-russian-engineers-revived-telegrams-blockchain/?sh=68bf114e4b31
Coindesk: https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2020/05/07/sidestepping-telegram-devs-and-validators-launch-fork-of-ton-blockchain/
Fiance.Yahooo: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/freeton-set-launch-groundbreaking-bridge-133500711.html#:~:text=FreeTON%20Set%20to%20Launch%20Groundbreaking%20Bridge%20DAO%20at%20the%20End%20of%20October,-October%2021%2C%202021&text=DeFi%20developer%20Broxus%20has%20announced,the%20FreeTON%20Bridge's%20multichain%20structure.
Sebirkhan (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
or for example article on main CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/gravity/articles/29470
Sebirkhan (talk) 19:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yahoo Finance is a press release/republished, Forbes is a contributor piece and not reliable as per WP:FORBESCON/WP:RSP and coindesk is deprecated. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
With your permission, I'd like to share a list of some of the publications I've written about Everscale: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FJN1MsDMo8mg8VrVA21pi-cGjDF1nztgdPDROuYUgB8/edit#gid=0
And for example new article by entrepreneur: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/429250
Sebirkhan (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae, please check this Article on Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2022-05-21/everscale-hosts-biggest-blockchain-conference-in-bali-drawing-crypto-leaders-from-over-15-countries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Bloomberg
Sebirkhan (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No. It's a press release and not only does it say it on the ARTICLE, it says it in the link itself. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae, Kommersant is green in list Reliable sources (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Kommersant)
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4721483
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4343192
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4340312
Sebirkhan (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't mean that it's inherently notable because it has mere mentions or press releases in reliable sources. It requires in depth coverage. period. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can the International Chess Federation be a reliable source?
https://www.fide.com/news/1413
Sebirkhan (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's a press release. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is quite reliable source https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/mymoney/20220217153629-72-316221/mengenal-apa-itu-blockchain-teknologi-yang-mengubah-dunia Deterok53 (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20220518174358-37-339960/ternyata-ada-konferensi-blockchain-terbesar-di-bali Deterok53 (talk) 11:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Please follow the procedure at WP:SIRS to evaluate sources. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]