Hosta

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019), Archive15 (2020).

Foto

Visto le numerose foto rimosse, non metterò più foto che trovo su facebook (che sono foto libere di essere prese perchè ho sempre chiesto il permesso all'autore). Alberto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Davide Lorenzi (talk • contribs)

a strange deletion request

Hi again. I have gotten a rather strange deletion request for a file that I meticulously researched to ensure it met PD-Russia-1996 rules (I found a 1945 publication of it with no author attribution, and an archivist selling it at an auction gave no indication of who the author was, and author remains unknown). The initial deletion template was rather vague, saying "It looks like an mistaken license.". I thought I was being trolled at first since I was not mistaken with the licence and provided publication information, but apparently it's an experienced user. As requested I provided a link to the publication directly, which I did, but then he went on about how the person at the auction might secretly know the name of the author, (even though the back of the photo card had just a number on it, no photographer name at all) etc. What do you make of this? I've gotten a few similar nominations like this in the past that have turned out to be "keep". I have to say I am a bit annoyed by all the unusual "what-ifs" and goalpost-moving. I mean, if the auctioneer knows/knew the photographer name but kept it secret from the public, one would think it would be considered anonymous still? After all, if a samizdat work was written by a few authors who knew each other but kept their identities secret, it is considered anonymous since the public doesn't know.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Túrelio
	Hi Túrelio, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,    –Davey2010talk 18:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Túrelio! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

recent relation of faulty shower image

Hi I was wondering why the image was deleted as this image is a free image and was taken myself and has no copyright .kind regards Craig noble — Preceding unsigned comment added by "craignoble666" (talk • contribs) 16:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grüße

Hallo @Túrelio: ,
Für die kommenden Weihnachtstage wünsche ich Dir alles Gute.
Möge uns das neue Jahr 2020 hier und überall ein friedliches Miteinander und eine erfolgreiche Zeit bringen.
Ganz herzlich möchte ich mich bei Dir für Deine stete Hilfe bedanken, wenn ich hier nicht mehr weiter weiß oder meine Nerven etwas blank liegen.
Danke und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 0690.jpg

File:IMG 0690.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙

Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jochen A. Werner

• de:Jochen A. Werner

Just leaving a note since I remember you speak German. But someone may want to check this for appropriateness. It seems likely to be spam/promotional. GMG^talk 15:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rampant copyright infringements

Hello. I come from English Wikipedia, and when a contributor is known to have 4-5 or more flagrant copyright violations, we open an investigation of all their contributions, because the violations we find are often merely the "tip of the iceberg". I wonder if any process is available here on Commons, where copyright is possibly much more likely to be infringed? As you know, I have examined the contributions of User:Thuy Ho and found the vast majority to be copyright violations. Administrators have mostly agreed with me, except for a few instances where you merely reverted because you couldn't find any evidence. I suggest that this contributor be investigated. I left some of his uploads alone because they appeared to be simple non-professional panoramic type snapshots that could be taken by anyone. But some people surely have a knack for stealing photos and presenting them as "Own work" and slipping by the copyright filter here. I find them once in a while coming to English Wikipedia and linking to their uploads. I strive to be thorough in wiping out their contributions when I can plainly see they are all copyvios. Is there any help or relief for people like me? Or should I just do them one at a time? Elizium23 (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Offensichtliche URV

Hallo Túrelio,

mir fallen immer wieder offensichtliche URV's auf Commons auf. Schema immer gleich: Niedrige Auflösung für 2019/2020, fehlende Exif-Daten, Pkw-Modelle einer bestimmten Marke, immer wieder neue Accounts mit Ramschuploads (wiederum mit Exif - zur Tarnung?), unterschiedliche Länderkennzeichen und andere Details (mediterrane Landschaft mit Olivenbäumen passt nicht zum tschechischen Kennzeichen). Wegen der niedrigen Auflösung und Unschärfe gehe ich von Screenshots aus Videos aus. Betrifft bis dato folgende User:

• LaKlement
• Mike-fiesta

Wäre generell für das Löschen eines Großteils der Bilder von neuen Pkw-Modellen und Sperre der User. Was meinst du? Was weiter machen? Danke dir! Pan Tau (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Pan Tau, sorry, ich bin bislang noch nicht dazu gekommen. Hoffentlich am Freitag. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, hat keine Eile. Läuft ja nicht davon. :) Liebe Grüße, Pan Tau (talk) 12:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues with User:Qiushufang

Hello. I am contacting you since you were involved in the identification of a copyvio by the said user (1). There is an ongoing discussion about further cases. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request question

Hi Túrelio, can you help me see how you can save the images that were nominated in this deletion request [1] Many of those images were uploaded 10 years ago with licenses in the public domain (Egypt, Lebanon, Syria) respectively. A week ago a reviewing user nominated them for deletion saying that the source was not specified. The images are in the public domain from the beginning of the last or mid-century, are all over the internet and are part of the cultural heritage of those countries that used them for their publications in the newspapers. All of these images are only to illustrate Wikipedia posts. Is there any way I can amend them? thanks.--Derbake (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Group delete

Hi, i need a (Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion) request for all of my uploads.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletes

Hallo Túrelio; ich habe in letzter Zeit ein paar offene DRs geschlossen, bei denen auf die Datei in der Zwischenzeit ein Schnelllöschantrag gestellt wurde, den du danach umgesetzt, aber dabei den DR offengelassen hattest, Beispiel Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert Blaich.jpg (DR-Template stand auch immer noch auf der Seite). Wäre vielleicht ganz praktisch, wenn du in solchen Fällen auch gleich den Löschantrag erledigen würdest. Wollte nur darauf hinweisen, keine grosse Sache :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Erinnerung. Hab mir danach Mühe gegeben, immer daran zu denken. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover rights request

Hi there. Several days ago, I put in a request for filemover rights over at Commons:Requests for rights, and the guideline at the top of the page says "[i]f your request has remained unanswered for several days, consider personally asking an administrator".

As I said in my nomination, I'm a prolific file uploader with an unfortunate bad habit of typos in filenames, and I would sooner take on the responsibility of correcting such filename errors myself than burden other editors with my mistakes. (In fact, the reason why your username stuck out to me at Special:ListUsers/sysop was because you've answered a few of my rename requests yourself!)

If there's anything you can do to speed the process along, it would be most helpful and appreciated. Thank you.

-- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The Cfccreates flickr ID has been a rich source of images of people associated with movies. I've uploaded well over a thousand images they posted on flickr, and about 400 headshots I cropped from those images.

This is the first time they have requested the deletion of an image. I didn't want to say this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kathryn Emslie at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg - but I think the explanation for the deletion is vanity. Ms Emslie is part of the management team at the Canadian Film Centre. Whoever runs the cfccreates flickr id is presumably a lot more junior than Ms Emslie.

Anyhow, since was one they uploaded, I think File:CFC in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is unobjectionable.

It never occurred to me to consider the flatteringness of the crop of Ms Emslie. But I don't think File:Virginia Rankin at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is particularly unflattering. Anyhow, she isn't CFC management. So I am happy to let sleeping dogs lie.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Victims_of_Islamism

Victims of Islamism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙

E4024 (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another favor

May this DR page be deleted please (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanley Kubrick in Dr. Strangelove Trailer (4) Cropped.jpg)? Not the file, but the page. I connected the main DR to the cropped file so it would be more simple. Thanks! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal maps

Hi Túrelio, please see also File:Nepal 1M N LD.jpg and File:New Official Map of Nepal.png, which I tagged for deletion before I found out how to use CSD. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bildquelle

Hallo Túrelio, heute bin ich über diese Seite [2] gestolpert. Kann es sein, dass sich bei den Bildern unter dem Link "Quelle" und weiteren Links der Seite nur Spam befindet? Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Orchi,

in der Tat. Das ist das typische Bild, wenn der ursprüngliche Domaininhaber eine Seite aufgegeben hat. Die paar Bilder, die ich mir angeschaut habe, sind ja alle 2015 hochgeladen worden. Da sie anscheinend im Kontext irgendeiner Aktion hochgeladen wurden (es gibt ja sogar einen eigenen Baustein), denke ich mal, dass die Lizenz heute nicht unbedingt hinterfragt werden muss; allerdings könnten Nachnutzer durch den heutigen Inhalt des Quuelllinks verärgert werden. Ich werde mal meine Kollegen fragen, ob wir für solche Fälle eine etablierte Vorgehensweise haben. Interessant: bei den ältesten 5 Uploads ist der Inhalt der Quelle noch in Ordnung. --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...die letzten Seiten hatte ich auch gesehen und habe dann etliche Sichproben gemacht. Ich bin mal gespannt, wie wie Du und Deine Kollegen die Angelegenheit sehen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for independent views

Hi, Túrelio please have a look if interested Commons:Deletion requests/File:Serum-institute-of-india-logo.png. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo T%C3%BArelio,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate request

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind redirecting this duplicate to Denis Thatcher 1988.tif? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tweet

Hi. I do not know which tweets are accepted and which not. The one at File:Yasa teklifi.png shows sensitive personal information about someone. IMO it should be speedily deleted. It does not help Commons at any way either. Thanks for your attention. --E4024 (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot

Thanks for your speedy deletion of my uploads. There was personal information in the exif data.

Do you think I can reupload these files once I have cleaned the exif? Yours sincerely,--Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo to be deleted

I would like to delete these 3 photos that I published, I was wrong to publish them, thanks--Samuele Redaelli (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanged_Man.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanged_Man1.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beheaded_Heads.jpg

RE:Pala Olimpico image

Hi, sure, no problem :)--Mannivu · ✉ 16:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

Hello Túrelio, while patrolling I came across these user uploads which I tagged for csd. But I'm not sure about few files. Please have a look here when you're free. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 07:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wegkarte - Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.pdf

Hi, what about File:Logo Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.jpg which is a part from the same publication? --He3nry (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Objects by provenience in the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Hi, your given cause for deltion was: "test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content". So. I created this page in 2017. It was not an "accident". There was no "nonsense". The content was "valid". May the times are changing and the way how things becoming sorted are changing. This is OK then. But why, please explain me, why, you give such an defamatory and offensive cause for the deletion? Really, I don't think, my work deserve this. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC) PS: gerne auch noch auf deutsch: Du hast das mit der Angabe eines ungemein beleidigenden Grundes gelöscht. Ich verstehe und akzeptiere, wenn sich manche Dinge verändert und man anders sortiert. Alles OK. Aber diese Kategorie war kein Unfall. Sie war kein Unsinn. Der dort gesammelte Inhalt war absolut valide. Warum löschst du also mit einer so ehrabschneidenden, beleidigenden Begründung? Wirklich, ich raffe es nicht.[reply]

Hi,

du meine Güte. Man kann auch etwas überempfindlich sein. 1) nicht ich habe die Kategorie zur Löschung markiert, sondern User:Ruff tuff cream puff. Die gewählte Löschrationale wird dabei automatisch in die edit-summary übertragen. Da ich heute zig leere Kategorien gelöscht habe, genau aus dem Grund, dass sie leer waren (CSD C2), ändere ich nicht jedesmal manuell die edit-summary. 2) Der hier vom SLA-Steller benutzte Löschgrund "CSD G1" ist einer der ganz offiziellen Criteria for speedy deletion. Da die Kat. leer war, hatte sie zumindest jetzt "no valid content", nämlich gar keinen. Das nun als "ungemein beleidigend" und "ehrabschneidend" zu etikettieren, dazu fällt mir nichts mehr ein. Anyway, ich habe den SLA-Steller aufgefordert, für solche Fälle in Zukunft CSD C2 statt CSD G1 zu nehmen.--Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Neuhaus

you allowed yourself to remove David Neuhaus's photo while it was himself who provided him for his Wikipedia page!!! Yannick Pichard (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

as you have many deleted files already, are you talking about File:David Neuhaus.jpg? If yes: when he "provided it", why did you write "own work" of Yannick Pichard? Anyway, if he has shot it really by himself or has obtained enough copyright from the photographer, he needs to send a statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org which confirms the release of the image under the choosen free license. You find a text-template at: Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Udalov

Both of photos are my own and were created by me and later used on other websites. I granted licence to wikimedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitic (talk • contribs)

hola

Hola turelio, acabo de subir una foto que es de dominio publico pero me la marcaron como que no y la estamos usando en la wikipedia en español y vamos a subirla a la wikipedia en italiano, acabo de mandar un mail pero realmente tengo dudas de si eso es asi, te pido por favor tu ayuda no se como hacerlo bien la foto es la siguiente

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carloacutis.jpg

En flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/146857093@N05/49697934528/in/photolist-75y172-kXCBkF-kXDfBx-2iHCUu9-75y1bi-qeDg4E-2huVPox-2huVPp9-2huWPvW-2huVPpV-2huVPBZ-2huVPrP-2huVPk6-2huWPrC-2huT5ZR-2huT5ZA-2huWPBT-2huWPtM-2huT63G-2huT64o-2huT617-2huT5UL-2huWPzP-2huT62E-2huWPzD-JJhmr3-2huT65F-2huT65W-2huT68g-2huT662-2huVPAg-2huVPnL-2huT68b-2huVPz9-2huWPJm-2huWPHz-2huVPwd-JLxC2t-2gHKoyo-WMEXZx-2iMN4Vg-2huVPnf-ow8uaE-2iMN2bU-2iMSwdh-2iMSwgD-odsRbL-2jMe783-otexNs-ftWRqS

Muchas gracias por tu ayuda

Hello turelio, I just uploaded a photo that is in the public domain but they marked it as no and we are using it in the wikipedia in Spanish and we are going to upload it to the wikipedia in Italian, I just sent an email but I really have doubts about whether That is so, I ask you please your help I do not know how to do it well the photo is the following

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carloacutis.jpg

https://www.flickr.com/photos/146857093@N05/49697934528/in/photolist-75y172-kXCBkF-kXDfBx-2iHCUu9-75y1bi-qeDg4E-2huVPox-2huVPp9-2huWPvW-2huVPpV-2huVPBZ-2huVPrP-2huVPk6-2huWPrC-2huT5ZR-2huT5ZA-2huWPBT-2huWPtM-2huT63G-2huT64o-2huT617-2huT5UL-2huWPzP-2huT62E-2huWPzD-JJhmr3-2huT65F-2huT65W-2huT68g-2huT662-2huVPAg-2huVPnL-2huT68b-2huVPz9-2huWPJm-2huWPHz-2huVPwd-JLxC2t-2gHKoyo-WMEXZx-2iMN4Vg-2huVPnf-ow8uaE-2iMN2bU-2iMSwdh-2iMSwgD-odsRbL-2jMe783-otexNs-ftWRqS

Thank you very much for your help--Gafr89 (talk) 11:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

画像の復旧

https://www.instagram.com/p/CClVjdrnSTW/

これは私が撮影した画像で著作権は私です。

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/葵井えりか

元データ、エビデンスもあるので削除した画像を復旧してください。

Ystk911 Ystk911 (talk) 01:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Evans' pic

Hello, and thank you for your message. I am trying to reach him to obtain permission but if the photo must come down in the meantime, c'est la vie. Cheers,--Kalli13 (talk) 01:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello, Túrelio. You have new messages at 轻语者's talk page. You may at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ |

I don’t know if you have received the reminder. I have responded to your question on my talk page. --轻语者 (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg

Why don't this file deleted? Nothing is linked to it. I'm uploading new version by https://svgtranslate.toolforge.org and I thought the original language is replaced by English so I created that file, however after that I realized that the file would have different language when it linked in Wikipedia and separate file isn't needed. Hddty (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg is deleted. However, a redirect[3] has been placed on it, to File:China-pyramid-1982.svg. You had reqested that by yourself[4]. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I request that the page File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg should also be deleted, not just redirected. Hddty (talk) 13:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G7

Hey Túrelio, I'm wondering why you decided to speedy delete File:Octicons11-alert-24.svg and File:Octicons11-archive-24.svg under COM:CSD#G7. They were uploaded on 17 October 2020 and deletion was requested on 28 October 2020, which is more than the maximum age of 7 days for G7. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AntiCompositeNumber, sorry for forgetting to answer your question for that long time. When deciding deletion-requests by uploader I take some liberty after judging the overall situation. In this case, the 2 icons were unused and weren't unique works by the uploader, but simply copied from a still existing website (GitHub). So, in case of need, they could easily be re-uploaded from the original source (or restored on Commons). Therefore, I decided to speedy instead of opening 2 regular DRs. --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marc Mauillon © INANIS.jpg

hi I got a message from you and apparently the metadata is really wrong! The photographer who took this portrait of me is known as INANIS https://www.inanisphotographe.com. You can contact him to check that I bought the rights of this photo for promotion. I'll write to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to let them know. Best regards M.

Category:Paola_Ghanem

Category:Paola_Ghanem has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙

Lemondethemyscira (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Max cainele erou

va salut ! mi-ati sters fisierul (fotografia) Max cainele erou pe motivul ca am copiat-o dupa pagina de facebook fotografia e facuta de mine si publicata aici tot de mine, pagina ,,Max cainele erou de pe facebook este tot de mine creata asa se explica de ce fotografia o gasiti si acolo, nu am violat nimic, drepturile de autor sunt ale mele, va rog daca se poate sa repuneti la loc imaginea multumesc frumos pentru intelegere cu stima Florica Jianu

Hi,

I have no idea about which image you are talking. None of the uploads of your account has been deleted. So, what is the exact filename? --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user you warned seems to have moved to a new acount

Hi Túrelio, it appears, User:Kroger4, a prolific uploader of copyrighted images, whom you warned, has now moved to a new account, User:Eyes Roger. User:BevinKacon pointed out that much and the edit history pretty well supports this with evidence. Not sure if this is a sock puppet violation and, if yes, what the procedure on Commons is to deal with such an issue. Should or does need anything to be done about this? Calistemon (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Violation Notice

Hi, I saw that you deleted my File:DA'HAKAN PRESS PHOTO 2019 (Cropped).jpg with the cause of copyright violation: https://wannart.com/icerik/2377-ankaradan-yukselen-kuvvetli-ses-dahakan-yigit-koc-ve-bdg but I sent the photo to Wannart actually. Hope we can fix this misunderstanding and misaction. Thanks for your help. --Palaangelino (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, currently busy; will take care in the evening or tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Importations de copyvio en nombre

Bonjour Turellio, le contributeur User talk:Tedrahcir verse depuis le mois de juin 2020 des images images dont il ne peut, de toute évidence être l’auteur. Il faudrait pour cela qu’il soit photographe professionnel et dans la profession depuis plus de quarante ans, ce qui à l’évidence n’est pas le cas… Je pense qu’il serait nécessaire d‘enquêter et de faire cesser ce trafic et de faire une suppression globale. Merci, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Googletranslate : Hello Turellio, User talk:Tedrahcir has been uploading images since June 2020 which he obviously cannot author. This would require him to be a professional photographer and in the profession for over forty years, which obviously is not the case... I think it would be necessary to investigate and stop this traffic and to do a global deletion. thank you, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctruongngoc,

complicated looking case. I've tagged all images with evidence-based copyvio-suspicion. But for the majority there were no external hits (neither via Google-Images, TinEye nor direct name-search on Google). Shortly thereafter I received the message below. As the uploader might be the rightsholder (and become a potially valuable contributor), it seems better if a French-speaking user/admin takes over. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke sehr für Ihre Antwort ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Un homme en fuite - Roger Jendly.jpg‬ ».

Bonjour,

Je suis le producteur du film "Un homme en fuite" de Simon EDESLTEIN réalisé en 1980. Le droits du film et les affiches m'appartiennent. Bonne soirée. Claude RICHARDET--2A01:CB14:1E9:2700:50F9:20DA:FF7B:C36D 20:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

as you were not logged-in, I assume you are User:Tedrahcir, right? I will then transfer this case to a French-speaking colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please delete my picture

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:박윤찬.jpg

user id : 박윤찬 that's my mistake. would you delete my picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 박윤찬 (talk • contribs)

Anton Docher pictures

@Túrelio:

Hi Turelio, you intend to delete the Anton Docher's related photos. Before to do so, here’s what I know about these pictures. I found them in an old family album in my grandparents' attic. They were sent to his brother (my grandfather’s grandfather) by Padre Docher himself, who was then a missionary in America. My family being affiliated with the padre. They date for the most part from the 19th century or early twentieth (except that of the burial which is of 1928) and are the work of one or more unknown authors (no signature present on both sides). So I scanned the original prints, found in the album, to donate them to Wikimedia Commons thinking that they had historical (even modest) importance. I don’t know how to assign them a rights license or anything, I did my best to improve the license, but I don’t know if that’s enough. Please tell me what is correct to apply them as a copyright in this case. Thank you for your help.--Bougnat87 (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo replacement

Good afternoon. Please help me please replace the Main photo on my page. New photos have been uploaded to the Wiki warehouse with an open license. I don't know how to replace the photos. Please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr Elfimov 1980 (talk • contribs)

Requesting support

New year greetings,

Earlier in Octo.2020 @ village pump Copyright received your positive response for assistance in uploading old images from a research paper in PDF but the web link did not open then.

Now I find a new PDF link @ academia.edu

Subsequently after some wait resource request @ Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange got positive response that 2 images are already on commons and with assistance is now needed in uploading 4 images according to following info.:

Page number and image numbers in bracket: 244(8.2), 252(8.3), 254(8.4), 259(8.6) of new PDF link @ academia.edu ( For article en:Superstitions in Muslim societies )

8.2: Better image here

8.3: Better image here

8.4: Better image here (on the dropdown at the top of the image viewer, select "f. 38 b")

8.6: Better images here

8.2, 8.3, 8.4 are certainly out of copyright, as understood by Commons policy; they're either super-old two-dimensional works,... 8.6 consists of photos (of a three-dimensional work) over which the Smithsonian claims copyright, and so may still be copyrighted (need to be confirmed for copyright status).

I do not find myself technically competent to complete activity on my own hence Requesting your kind assistance in above respect.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bookku,

I will look into that, but it may take some time. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I hope I am not making request too early again. It's not that it is too urgent, and you can take your time, but it is quite likely that I might forget myself over a period of time. Since I was visiting commons thought it's better to drop in a message.

Thanks for your support and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karamjeet Madonna

Hallo Túrelio, Du schreibst, Deutsch ist Deine Muttersprache - dann also auf Deutsch! :-)

Erstmal danke, dass Du Dich um diese URV gekümmert hast. Der Nutzer hat einen ganzen Haufen Bilder von dieser Frau hochgeladen, einige davon praktischerweise gleich mit "during a photo shoot" gekennzeichnet, also gewissermaßen selbsterklärte URV. Etliche davon findet man auch auf ihrer Website wieder; ich hab's jetzt nicht bei allen überprüft.

Ich hatte hier schon angefragt, ob es für sowas nicht eine Art Stapelverarbeitung gibt, aber ich weiß nicht, ob das da jemand sieht. Muss man womöglich jetzt jedes Bild einzeln markieren? --217.239.15.103 13:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Túrelio,

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a draft policy (available in many languages). We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am perfectly aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Túrelio

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Túrelio,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biographien

Guten Tag. Beschaeftige mich hier seit Jahren als IP mit verschieden Biographien, vor allem betreffend Zweite Polnische Republik. Bei Bearbeitung der Vermissten Personen baue ich ein Info über den zuletzt bekannten Verbleib der Person ein (weil man soetwas in wikidata nicht einbauen kann oder ich habe keine Ahnung wie man es tut). Solche Infos werden sehr oft von "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt und revertiert. Es gibt Biographien mit sehr seltenen Nachnamen die wirkliche "Einzelstuecke" bei der Wikiprogrammen sind und deswegen existieren keine automatischen Kategorien fuer eben solche seltene Namen. Fuer solche Faelle benutze ich die Schablone "DEFAULTSORT:Nachname, Vorname" damit alles richtig kategorisiert wird ... und hier das naechtste Problem : "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt diese defaultsort Schablone und danach es wird nach dem Vornamen kategorisiert. Wenn er schon so etwas tut dann soll er auch dafuer sorgen das die Dateien (die von ihm revertiert werden) nach dem Nachnamen kategorisiert werden. Da ich systematisch mit Bibliothek und Buch-Quellen arbeite ist wirklich sehr schaedigend wenn ich immer wieder in meiner Arbeit zurueckgeworfen werde. Falls Sie nicht in der Lage sind weiter zuhelfen dann leiten Sie es bitte an jemanden der es kann. Hier einige Beispiele: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Vielen Dank. Gruesse. 2A01:C22:8448:7100:1C55:E597:187C:264D 13:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Peruvian commemorate coins

Hi, Your bot deleted nearly all the photos I made and published of Peruvian commemorative coins. I am referring my work to the Wikipedia page of German commemorative coins. The German government obviously has no problem publishing fotos of commemorative coins. I am very sorry that the Peruvian BCRP is more restrictive than the German government and I hope you checked this fact briefly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennoBu (talk • contribs)

Bitte um Umbenennung

Hallo @Túrelio: ,
bei der Aufarbeitung der Humboldtfotos habe ich was verwechselt, 29 Bilder in der inzwischen korrekt umbenannten Chan Chan Kategorie laufen fälschlicherweise unter "Vichama-Kultur", beim ersten Foto habe ich schon eine Verschiebung zu "Chimú in Chan Chan 01" beantragt. Gibt es ein Tool, um die 28 anderen umzubenennen, mit dem ich das vielleicht selber machen könnte? Und noch was: Die Kategorien für die Einzelthemen der Humboldttour habe ich jetzt mit dem Datum vorne benannt, so wie wir das früher bei den WAF-Exkursionen praktiziert haben. Dazu setze ich jeweils noch die Themenkategorie wie bei wie bei den umzubenennenden Bildern "Chan Chan". Sollen die Datumskategorien mit hidden versehen werden. Cat a lot ist mir inzwischen geläufig, dank TKarcher, der mir das beigebracht hat. Vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße aus München --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 16:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pimpinellus Könnte ich mit User:Perhelion/massrename.js erledigen. Ansonsten könntest du eventuell COM:Filemover-Rechte beantragen, um das in Zukunft selbst klären zu können. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank 1234qwer1234qwer4 für die Informationen, ich werde gelegentlich mal versuchen, die Filemover-Rechte zu erlangen. Da ich bei den Commonsrules nicht so versiert bin, wäre dennoch gut, wenn jemand auf meine Aktionen weiterhin ein aufmerksames, wohlwollendes Auge hätte. Grüße aus München --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 06:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pimpinellus Alles klar. Habe die Dateien mal selbst verschoben. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:30, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For quickly cleaning up things I tag with speedy deletion, thank you! Elli (talk) 08:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

bogeyvisit

Hello Túrelio, Today, you deleted the picture File:Frédéric_Fréry_en_mars_2020.jpg However, there is no copyright violation with this picture: it is fully free of rights, and this is the reason why the website https://www.premium-communication.fr/conferenciers/inno is using it. Please undelete this picture and restore it on the Frédéric Fréry Wikipédia page: there is no reason to delete it from Wikimedia Commons. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.94.185.105 (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unknown,

problem is that this image is just a b/w version of the image File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg, which was dealt with in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg. So, we still need a permission by author Wojciech WOJCIK. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio,

Thank you for your prompt answer. I confirm that author Wojciech WOJCIK sent a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on September 24, 2020.

Can you check this mailbox and restore the image? Thank you in advance —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.94.185.105 (talk) 08:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I can't check that by myself as I have no access for that. But I've asked at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now we have an answer; see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Permission_by_Wojciech_WOJCIK_for_File:Frédéric_Fréry.jpg_?. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio,

Thank you for your answer. Can you tell me what is a « completed permission statement » and where it must be sent ? I will transmit this to the author, Wojciech WOJCIK. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB09:8047:C7F:9079:1771:7C95:D39C (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, better you contact directly the OTRS-volunteer, who answered this question (linked above). I am not on OTRS and have no access. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Prince418

Hi. You have already deleted, as have done other admins before, several uploads by this user. I understand they have no interest in contributing positively to Commons. Why don't you simply delete all their junk uploads and give them a warning? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you very much. Can you also close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait Picture of Ozge Sezince Varley.jpg please? The hubby understood there is no need to remove the pic. (Look at its TP also, bitte.) --E4024 (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Bin gut drauf und schick dir jetzt ein Kätzchen! Ach ja, bleib gesund!

RealAppleFreak (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind looking at File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg? I think it's a reupload of a file you deleted on February 19, 2021. This latest version is now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg and there is a post by the uploader at File talk:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg. I came across this file via en:WP:THQ#Johnny Mcghee where the uploader was asking about it at the English Wikipedia Teahouse. For what it's worth, I think the uploader means well, but perhaps might be getting some bad advice. She states she asked a lawyer about the photo, but I wouldn't have too much confidence in any lawyer who says or implies that photographing someone else's creative work means there's been a transfer of copyright. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre el uso del Escudo del Huila

Hola, Túrelio He subido una nueva versión del escudo del Huila (en Colombia), que conozco por nacimiento. Como verás, la versión de 2010 no se parece en mucho a la versión oficial, como podrás comprobar en varios enlaces como el de la Gobernación, el de los símbolos del Departamento, y otras versiones (1) (2) que se han intentado publicar en Wikipedia. Te agradezco puedas ayudarnos a conservar este nuevo archivo SVG e, incluso, si puedes, ayudarnos a borrar las versiones anteriores, que son imprecisas en su apariencia heráldica y representativa del Departamento del Huila.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jose Collazos (talk • contribs) 13:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks a lot for your deletions! :)

Sannita (WMIT) (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open deletion requests

Hello Túrelio, firstly thank you for your speedy deletion logs and deletion requests process. Commons:Deletion requests#Lists of requests Here, there has been a lot of request waiting to be closed since June 2020. For example, there are some requests will be closed what I opened since September 2020. As Commons admins, can you reduce these? Of course, you can't do it alone, I think some Commons admins can it together. Sorry if I'm worrying unnecessarily for deletion requests. Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You are a hero on commons. Thank you for your help and guidance..245CMR.•👥📜 10:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hey, just wondering if you would mind granting me rollback, so I could undo bad edits / block evasion faster. Per the rollback policy, asking an admin is preferred, and you've done me some favors before with deleting some files, so I hope you wouldn't mind. Thanks! Elli (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Lithuanian activity on Commons

@Túrelio: Hello, thanks for deleting the falsely named category of "Lithuanian occupation of Vilnius". Could you please take a look at this dispute as well: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Files_named_with_meaningless/disruptive_names_(motivated_renaming_was_reverted_without_any_valid_reason) because it is a similar anti-Lithuanian story, which is full of disruptive naming and editing. The activity is performed by a Belarusian ultra nationalist who calls the Lithuanians as rubbish (1, 2, 3). -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pranay Dongre 27

Hi. All of the images this user uploaded are copyright violations. Would you look into it and delete them when you have time? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:301D:22B2:4000:95EB:5DB9:B94D:1C83 (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Little help

I found this image on pt.WP uploaded under a fair use rationale. As the image was uploaded on Flickr under a 2.0 license, I decided to upload it here and nominate the Pt.WP image for deletion. However, when the image was already uploaded I find out that another identical, but with lower resolution, image was uploaded here sometime ago. What to do in this case? Regards.

Tulério, it seems that things are more serious than I thought. Could you please give it a look at this user uploads (see his Talk page). It seems that he's engaged in COM:LL. He uploaded several images from Flickr accounts that only uploaded images to be uploaded on Commons. I created a thread here, but things seems worse that I thought, and I would like someone experienced to look into beforehand. Thanks again for your time.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 02:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SirEdimon,

the account in question seems to be a sort of complex case. While he has many uploads deleted as copyvios, the above mentioned image, the 2nd version (low res), got an OTRS-confirmed permission. As I am on holiday for some weeks, I cannot devote too much time currently to analyze his upload-pattern. We should simply be on watch and check all his uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tulério. First, I'm sorry to bother your holidays, and thanks for answering my message. What should I do about the images? Can we merge both? Which of them should be deleted? What should I do? Regards.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 00:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg

Hi Turelio, could you take a look at the deletion request above? You deleted File:President Joe Biden meets with His Majesty The King of Belgium and Prime Minister Alexander De Croo.jpg under similar circumstances, and I'm not sure why. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 14:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bait30, wrt the later image: it seems I missed to realize the version-history. However, as both files were uploaded this month, it seems justifiable to retain the high-res image over the low-res image, though the latter was uploaded a bit earlier. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but why not rv File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg to the high res version, which I uploaded first, and then delete File:P20210613AS-1419 (51269148664).jpg as a duplicate instead? By doing this you can keep the version and page histories intact. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 22:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

Deletion request for File:Sajan Prakash (swimmer).jpg

Hello, Thanks for starting this delete discussion. As I had mentioned in the speedy request it is quite obvious by comparing the original uncropped image and the wikipedia image of Cherantha de Silva that this image has been wrongly labeled. Also google search for the two swimmers, Sajan Prakash and Cherantha de Silva can confirm the mistake. I was wondering if any more information is needed to confirm the deletion. Shantham11 (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to comment!

You commented in the original Heather Moreton-Aboudaner RfD. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Continental European breed files from Heather Moreton-Abounader Flickr stream is now open, your comments would be appreciated. --Pitke (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

A user from Vietnamese Wikipedia believed files uploaded by this user might constitute advertising or self-promotion. All these files seem to be about real estate projects somewhere in Vietnam and are linked to some external websites (backlink?). I hope you can take a look at these images. Ltn12345 (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ltn12345, over the last days/weeks I have deleted a lot of images from Vietnam under that rationale, which had been tagged as such by another :vi-user. Of course, I do not know whether the uploader(s) is/are acting as a spammer or in good-faith but with ignorance of our policies. In case my latter assumption is true, it would be good if you or other :vi-users, being native vi-speakers, could explain the uploader(s) what is o.k. to upload to Commons and what is not o.k. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vespa (zespół muzyczny)

Haie Túrelio,

wenn Du eine Kategorie mit einem "falschen" Namen löschst, stell bitte sicher, dass sie nicht in der einzigen Wikipedia die einen Artikel dazu hat noch verlinkt ist. Sonst ist die Löschung eine Verschlechterung der Wikipedia. Ich habe es inzwischen erledigt ....Sicherlich ^talk 19:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, ich war natürlich davon ausgegangen, das der Markierer, der die cat auch verschoben hatte, das überall angepasst hatte. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please "undelete" Photo_of_Rita_C._Richey_courtesy_of_Wayne_State_University_web_page.jpg

Good afternoon, Turelio:

I just noticed that you have deleted File:Photo_of_Rita_C._Richey_courtesy_of_Wayne_State_University_web_page.jpg.

I had contacted Dr. Richey requesting permission to use the picture, and she granted permission stating that the picture had no copyright as it was just a casual shot taken by her husband.

I,then, emailed to her the following: “If a copyrighted file is uploaded by someone who is not the copyright holder, or the copyright status is not stated at the external file's source, then the copyright holder needs to explicitly grant permission for the distribution of the file under a free license. You can send permission statements to Wikimedia using the release generator (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team

Later that same day (October 8, 2021), she confirmed that her husband had completed the steps on the release generator. Therefore, I am surprised to see that the picture has been deleted.

Please "undelete" the picture, or advise me of the steps needed to fix this.

Thanks in advance. Andrea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea Peart (talk • contribs) 19:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrea, it was deleted as there was no notice in the description about a pending permission. Next time, when you have a positive signal wrt permission, add {{OTRS pending}} to the image. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restore

Hello Túrelio I hope you're doing well. Could you restore Category:Eisha Singh. Thanks --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 07:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Dear Turelio; I understand you have left me message on talk page somewhere, however it is nearly impossible to find it in all the confusing layout of the wikimedia page [design very badly thought out!] So please let me send a brief message here then maybe you can send response more easy to find? I am representing user GREYMANBY [yes the one that so offended everybody on your publication by honest portrayal of human male form. That aside now; my query regarded more a couple of files which were I strongly believe deleted unnecessarily ; in a way I believe was most unfair and done with no regard! 1; Twitchy Bird [small bird at a window]. 2; Globe nude and dance sequences[ webm video] Firstly twitchy bird' I never realised was obscene or even explicit [may be I should knit some pants for it?] next time I see it? 2; Globe nude dance sequences; is a normal almost idealistic portrayal of normal human [nude] form; it is NOT EXPLICIT SEXUALLY, it instead represents a contrast to other files, which are gone, by its too good to be true setting [archive video ] in a lovely field with blue sky [and no rude bits happening!]] This film is in tradition of the nude in art and was placed separately to other explicit titles deliberately so as to show a complete contrast to the male human nude representation as a moving image. You will not find that ideal setting now as that was years ago preserved on analogue 8mm tape. Forgive me for going on here in your 'barn star' box but wikimedia is very confusingly layed out [and with awful spell checker too} I am not usually this bad at typing! If the other files offended so much; I can put up with that. But tell me why a small 'twitchy bird. and incidentally a photo of a red poppy, and naturally photographed video of male nude form without any sexual content, have being sliced out of wikimedia commons for good? What will you be left with?? A few almost Victoriana bodies covered with pantaloons ? or for that matter many offensive still existent images which personally offend me too [of which age captions printed may actually be illegal}? Have a look and you will find two photos which I think are suspicious on the now emptier page on [Penis]. Sorry to say that rude word again..! Pleas Turelio don't take this personally; it is jut that I cannot find where to reply fully on the confusingly laid out pages.. So bare with my angst [I am not really fuming]It is the principal that matters. I am certain that I have truly being singled out unfairly to 'set an example' to others [possibly as far back as September?]. I still request my 'twitchy bird' and Globe nude and landscape WEBM video be undeleted. As I believe the process was undertaken in a confusing and unfair manner; and with not a little bit of a one person viewpoint I feel? Could it be [i do not like to say for certain] an abuse of one particular administrator's protocol as well [ I am not not saying it is..but?] In meantime let your admin have this note they can all read it.. in fact every user can read it as well. [I could always put a PDF file together with my complaint if it is easier]. Thank you Turelio for your time in reading here and for attempting to contact me which is not easy in the very poorly designed media pages. Also I could not find an accent to put on your name as it is not in the type setup either. Will my twitchy bird ever fly home to roost?Will that nubile unrude male human nude ever dance freely in the fields again? Thank you ; and at least a 'Barnstar' for at least trying to comment to me [wherever it is in virtual space!]. PS' as I await a no doubt ineffective result to my complaint; I shall knit some trousers for that small Dunnock bird when it it appears at a window [if I can catch it! as it is very nervous!!] ONE TIME USER GREYMANBY of WIKIMEDIA COMMONS OCTOBER 19th 2021. Greymanby (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hello. Why you delete my image?! Лишина Ольга.jpg Viktorikus (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Viktorikus[reply]

Hi, please see your own talkpage: User talk:Viktorikus. The image was found prepublished, suggesting it's not your own work, as you had claimed. Now you state it's someone else's work. The photographer needs to confirm the choosen free license. See Commons:OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the deletion of a category and its images

I was wondering if Category:Goblin Market (Rackham) could be deleted and all of the images within.

I have a strong feeling that not only was the USA version printed at the same time, making it in the Public Domain since there is no copyright notice, but that it is actually and also a reprinting of an earlier work, whose records were lost in the war.

Those feelings cannot be confirmed, so they should be deleted until 2029.

If you feel like there should be some discussion somewhere, I am a strong believer in feelings like that and will comply. --RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not an expert for U.S. copyright. Now, I wonder what is the rationale for 2029? Christina Rossetti died in 1894, so, at least her poems should be in the PD everywhere. I didn't check who created the illustrations, but they might be of similar age. Anyway, if you insist (or want to be on the safe side), you, being the uploader, could also voice a G7-request. --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the Rackham illustrations. I have two books that claim this work was published in 1933 (the biblios are 1960 and 1994). So the last year of copyright is 2028. Rackham died in 1939. My problem with these books being the last word is that they also claim that the first publication of two other books of Rackhams were in the 1930's (he did a lot in the last six or seven years of his life, according to those bilbios), and yet, I have a dust cover advertising those books in the 1910s. Actually, about when the war started.

What is G7? I might have a voice for that!--RaboKarbakian (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC) OH! G7 is for deletion!! I was thinking it was a "Gray area type discussion", gray area describes my feelings about this.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 21:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry. G7 is the official code for deletion on request of the uploader within 7 days of upload, which requires no further substantiation, provided the files are not in use. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi Túrelio, Not quite sure what Cropperfield was doing but could you delete File:CPAM 1410 AM logo (cropped).png and undelete File:CPAM 1410 AM logo.png please as I think they only wanted the file cropped?, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. However, it was like this, as you can see from the history: Cropperfield had req File:CPAM 1410 AM logo.png for dupe-deletion to File:CPAM 1410 AM logo (cropped).png, which I had performed. Thereafter he req deletion of the redir-page. Before he had removed the description etc. from the first file. --Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Túrelio I appreciate that, I see - but i can't understand why he wanted the original file deleted as he wasn't the uploader of it but I guess that's a question only he can answer :), I've speedied the other image :), Thanks for your help my friend, Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 13:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I intervened here, as I can see some user requested to crop a file to reduce blank spaces around. I tried to do it too, but with crop tool I can't overwrite the file. If someone can help me for that.--Jean Ernest Pierre (talk) 17:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I was originally asked to crop this and when I did I was told it wasn't good enough hence myself reverting. You're more than welcome to ask at COM:Help Desk or failing that contribute (not GAME but contribute) to the project until a time where the restrcitions on things pass. –Davey2010^Talk 20:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since that I deposed my message here, I discovered that I can overwrite files of others with crop tool after four days. Soon as I can, I will crop it leaving a little bit of blank spaces around to not delete partial peaks of the logo (I know it because I've seen history of Davey2010 talk page). By then, maybe someone else can do it at your sole discretion.--Jean Ernest Pierre (talk) 20:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problem to upload pictures 23/10/2021 TaishiboTaishibo (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am writing an article for a celebrity and every pictures I m trying to upload are being refused.... What can I do ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taishibo (talk • contribs) 18:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taishibo, always sign your posts (use: --~~~~). You need to search for a freely licensed image of Romy Indy; flickr.com might be a good choice. However, as Flickr has different licenses, remember, we accept only CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-Zero. If you don't find an image, you might directly contact Mrs. Romy Indy, as she should also have an interest to have a nice image in her Wikipedia-article. Though you need it only for her Wikipedia-article, the image must be released under a free license, which also allows others to use it. See Commons:Email templates for a template, which Mrs. Indy must provide to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G7 deletion revert

Hi There, This (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boro_Phali_with_peacock_and_headgear_motif.png) was uploaded by me. Why does it not qualify for G7 deletion? Northeast heritage (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, because G7 means "within 7 days after upload". Depending on the circumstances, I sometimes take some liberty about the 7 days. But, this image was uploaded in 2020 AND it is in use. You are still free to open a regular deletion-request (non-speedy). However, the chance for being decided with "delete" are probably slim, as the image is valuable and in scope. --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Module deletion

Thanks for deleting Template:Equirectangular projection (G7). Could you also delete the corresponding module Module:Equirectangular projection? (It's not possible to use a speedy deletion template there.) Kanguole (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect deletion

Could you please delete this redirect File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg, so this file File:Flag of Mexico (1934-1968).svg could be renamed to File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg, not this File:Flag of Mexico (1934-1968, 2).svg, could you please restore the file you deleted. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 07:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request for Gallery views

In regard to the exhibition views you have nominated for deletion: 1) Can you direct me to the copyright regulations regarding works viewed in a gallery? 2) Is it permitted to blur the works so that they are not recognizable? Thanks.Trouver (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the problem here is copyright, as I assume that the shots were taken with the consent of the gallery owner. Artworks are copyrighted til 70 years after the death of the artist. Even if you legally buy an artwork from the artist, you don't automatically have the copyright of it. So, you can't make a photography and sell it (or upload it under a free license). This would require the consent (a license) from the artist (or his heirs, if he/she is already dead). Now, there is an exception from this copyright for works that are permanently installed in public space. This is called freedom of panorama (FoP), though it's terms differ heavily from country to country. For example, in the U.S. FoP-exception covers only buildings, nothing else. However, exhibitions in museums or galleries meet none of the two FoP conditions. So, if the depicted Artwork isn't already in the public domain (70 years pma), you need a permission from the artist.

Sure, you could blur the infringing artworks, however, many of the images would become more or less worthless by that. --Túrelio (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all photos were taken with gallery & artist's verbal but not signed consent. I believe the artists have passed, but copyright is obviously still in force. They can be replaced with more recent photos of different exhibitions accompanied by appropriate consent from both the artists & gallery. Thanks again.Trouver (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should have thought of this before: If the artists of the works exhibited in the gallery views are identified in the caption underneath the photos, is that acceptable, or will the photos still be deleted? Also, some of the photos have works that are hardly recognizable. Your response would be appreciated. Thanks.Trouver (talk) 07:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just mentioning the name of the artist, which is even a moral duty, does not replace a license. Whether or not the admin closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:ViewingExhibit-2.jpg (which will not be me) decides to keep or to remain will also depend on the visibility of artworks and whether they are considered to be de minimis or not. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NOT Copyright violation

Dear Túrelio you deleted my picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ANSKF.jpg

because you said (Copyright violation: Copyvio of https://www.facebook.com/299177186768550/photos/a.1633642769988645/3758262330860001/) which that page (ANSKF ) BELONGS TO ME I uploaded it on social media platforms .

thanks for your support

Alawi00 (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alawi00, ok, but, honestly, how could I have known that Facebook-account ANSKF belongs to you?

Anyway, in such cases our policies require that from an email address evidently associated with Facebook ANSKF a confirmation is sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The filename or URL (on Commons) of the image should be mentioned in that mail. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stamps of Azerbaijan in PD

Hello, Túrelio. Please, could you restore this file: File:Stamps of Azerbaijan, 2011-944.jpg?

See my comments at the page: File talk:Stamps of Azerbaijan, 2011-944.jpg. --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Seals of Lungwen Semen Olgerdovich

Is there a rule that the name of the categories should be exclusively in English and strictly coincide with the title of the article on enWikipedia? I've seen category names in Spanish, French, and Polish. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, see Commons:Naming_categories#Language as general guidance.

Personally I would say, if the item/thing of the category is known only in the original country and has little relevance outside of it, then the original language/name might be used for the category, as likely nobody will search for it in a different language. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:HeatherWatson2016 Wimbledon.jpg

I think you made this deletion in error. The user is a vanished account, and their username used to contain "Daniel" (I won't post their full username to respect their privacy, but you can easily find it in the file history of any of their uploads). They have clearly asserted that their Wimbledon series is self-photographed, and I don't see any evidence to the contrary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Restored and converted the pre-existing speedy into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Sorry if I'm kind of a newbie on Commons despite the fact that I've been around for quite a few years by now, but isn't it enough to flag an image as duplicate if there exists a copy with better file format (in my case PNG over JPG/JPEG)? Also, is there any procedure if I want to replace a JPG with a PNG without asking for deletion then reuploading (so that I could save the file history). Thanks for your patience :^) Claudio Dario al Dopolavoro ☕ 21:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Claudio,

our deletion policy requires in cases of several file-format-crossover duplicates not to use the speedy-duplicate template, but a regular deletion-request to allow for discussion; see Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates for details. In case your second question refers to wikipedia, that may depend on the local policy. But usually there is no problem to replace an image in a wikipedia-article by a better one. In cases of doubt, just propose the replacement on the talkpage of the article. --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My second question referred to here on Commons (I only upload files here), because I've looked around for a procedure here (e.g. renaming File:<fileName>.jpg to File.<fileName>.png without having to reupload and ask for deletion) but couldn't find much. I'm reuploading many of the images I've uploaded years ago with new versions in png (since it's loseless, I don't like lossy formats) and in higher resolutions, so that's why I'm putting {{Duplicate}} in many places, I don't know if there's any better way to do this tho so any advice would be appreciated. Claudio Dario al Dopolavoro ☕ 14:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted picture of Tomasz Makowski

Hello! The picture of Tomasz Makowski, which You deleted is my own work, so I have all the rights to it. It was just my inexperience with Commons and licensing - as I am an employee of National Library of Poland, I thought that I will connect this work more officialy with institution. That was my mistake, and i understand why You deleted it. I will send the picture again, this time with proper license as my own work, and please don't delete it this time and accept the change on his Wikipedia page, as the current picture doesn't suit the present look and status of Tomasz Makowski, and definietly need changing. With regards Conla (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conla,

wait. Better not re-upload it; it can easily be undeleted. However, first you/we should clarify the overall situation. 1) Are you intending to upload more images/material created on behalf of the created Biblioteka Narodowa? If yes, you should internally (Biblioteka Narodowa) discuss how these image shall be labelled with regard to the author, i.e. per the institution or per you as an individual. If 1) answers yes, you might also consider verifying your user-account as "Biblioteka Narodowa-account", see {{Verified account}}. This is not compelling, but might make some things easier.

Now, back to the deleted image: if it remains associated to the Biblioteka Narodowa, then an official from the Biblioteka Narodowa needs to send from their official email-address a confirmation to permissions-pl@wikimedia.org (OTRS), see Commons:Pozwolenia for more. --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply. This is definietly one time situation, as it was request from Tomasz Makowski himself - he was very upset with his latest picture (and rightly so, as it was really bad, unfitting and outdated). It was rather urgent and important case for me, so i have already uploaded it again last night, this time with proper license and no association to Biblioteka Narodowa, so there should be no legal controversions. And thank You for information about how it should be done properly, until now I was only uploading pictures from public domain, so I didn't have issues with licensing. I'm sorry for causing problems. With regards Conla (talk) 11:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Amelie Albrecht

Beste, Wat is het probleem met de foto van Amelie Albrecht? Vriendelijke groeten, Dirk Annemans — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirk Annemans (talk • contribs) 21:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I tried to understand that by myself, but I was unable to grasp the intricacies of the discussion on: nl. Anyway, as the image is hosted on Commons, the final discussion should run here.

Practically: the image had been tagged by an IP for speedy deletion. I have converted that speedy into a regular (slow) DR to enable a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frances Ginsberg Photo

Why is there a problem with copyright in Frances Ginsberg's photo, it has been uploaded from en.wikipedia site to tr.wikipedia with clear sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merthanyakisan (talk • contribs) 13:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ever read en:File:Francis Ginsberg.jpg? "non-free". :en-Wuikipedia has an exception-policy for such material. Commons does not and cannot legally allow such material, see Commons:Fair use. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

photos de plus de 70 ans

bonjour Túrelio, vous mettez en suppression des photos de documents qui on au minimum 70 ans, souvent plus, j'ai mis pas mal de sources (retronews.fr, la BNF) sinon ce sont des photos des magasines d'époque que je possède, je ne peux pas obtenir d'accord de gens qui sont morts depuis 1932 et bien avant). merci --Jpbrigand (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Jpbrigand, sorry, I am not good in writing French by myself, so I have to write in English (or German, if you prefer). I have no wish to delete any of your uploads and I am aware that likely most may be in the public domain. But, you really need to to provide the source and author information in such way and detail, that any recent-upload-patroler can check and evaluate it.

Let's take File:Pomiane 2.jpg as an example: for the description you wrote ".. Science et monde ... 1933", which I assume is the true source of the photography.

For the source you wrote "Retronews.fr = BNF", which likely is the source from which you obtained either the image itself or a print. But, the URL does merely lead to the portal, not to the image or the newspaper-page containing the photo. If there is a digital/online source, it is indispensable that you provide a link (URL) to the specific site, from where you took the source-material and where it is described (information about author, license, etc.)

For the author you wrote your username, which is not correct, as you did not shoot the original photo. You may have scanned it or simply copied from the source; I don't know. The correct author-entry is the original photographer. Either the original newspaper or the BNF portal should contain his/her name. If you have scanned the image from paper, you could use {{Self-scanned}}, or, if you scanned merely the photography, use {{Photo scan}}.

If you are willing to correct/adapt the description-data of your uploads, I can remove the problem-tags from the files. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kouider bounama

HELLO, YOU MAKE DELETE MY FILE File:تامر حسين.jpg ITS UNIQUE FILE THERE ARE NOT ON THE INTERNET .YOU MAKE MISTAKE FOR THIS I HAVE COPYRIGHT TO USE IT . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kouider bounama (talk • contribs) 19:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kouider bounama, sorry, but that's not credible. The file has no legitimate metadata from the camera, which it would have, if you had shot the image. Also, you have used the bogus Flickr-account "wiki lover" for license-laundering of most of your uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio ....Sorry, I don't know that using Flickr is against this way. Can you teach me how to upload a picture of an actor legally? For example, a company logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kouider bounama (talk • contribs) 20:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kouider bounama, logos are a complicated issue. If they are very simply, they may not be copyrighted. But that depends on the jurisdiction of the country of origin, see COM:TOO. But, if they are copyrighted, you cannot simply copy or redraw them and upload them to Commons. If you live in a country which has freedom-of-panorama exception also for other works than mere buildings and if you find the desired logo pinned to a wall/building in public space, then you could take a photograph of it and upload it under a free license to Commons, while claiming FoP; as I have done here: File:LogoHerzstiftung s6777.jpg. If that options doesn't exist, then you may ask the logo-owning institution/company/whatever whether they would release this logo under a free license (COM:L), so that it could be used in Wikipedia. Before trying this, consult Commons:OTRS for our terms. For further guidance about logos, sse Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks. --Túrelio (talk) 22:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

image use

Many thanks for message regarding use of the image of 'David Braid with mandolin' by Martyn Adelman. I have written to Martyn now to ask him to mail you his agreement of usage.

Kind regards,

Psai Basani. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psai Basani (talk • contribs) 10:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victo Solé.jpg

Hello, I understand your meaning about the File:Victo Solé.jpg. It's published on the web site of Amnesty International Belgique franchophone, but your right: there's a @DR under the picture (which was offered to AIBF, therefore the confusion). So, I'll check if I can find another picture (or the authorization from the photographer), and the picture can be deleted (I don't know how to do it). At least it isn't on the page anymore. Thanks! --Phensmans (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Túrelio, I'm quite new on the system... Did you get my previous message on this photo? Thanks for your work, Sincerely --Phensmans (talk) 19:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes. However, in my time-zone it's already late evening. I've seen that you opened a DR, which is fine for me. If I understood you correctly, you've given up about the image at hand, and are trying to find another one, right? --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! --Phensmans (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Those images I'd uploaded are better than the ones currently used (colour for Beth and more identifiable for Lauren. Please reconsider those deletions. Ava Bacon263 (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And that justifies uploading images, which you didn't shoot, but which are in the copyright of their photographers/agency, under a false free license, which will expose re-users to litigation for copyright-infringement? --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

True, I have found them online (Google search), is that a problem? Ava Bacon263 (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I see you are completely new to the Wikimedia world. Please jump to Commons:Licensing and just study the two cartoons to the right. Thereafter, you can read the page if you want. In a nutshell: every creative work (photo, drawing, painting, etc.) created today, is under the exclusive copyright of its author/creator. If you use such a work without having obtained a permission (=license) from the copyright-holder, you can easily be sued and will have to pay several hundreths of $. Of course, the author/photographer can release his works under a free license, as many of our contributors (and also on Flickr) do, which then can be used by everybody, providing the terms are met. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tekhelet ties.jpg

Zackdu (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)I am just inquiring about the File:Tekhelet ties.jpg that you deleted. I was wondering why you deleted it because from my understanding under the copy write laws I can not use the photo for commercial use or derivative works and my wikipedia article is neither a commercial use as it is not for profit nor a derivative work. So if you can please reverse your deletion of the picture that would be appreciated.[reply]

The image was released on Flickr under a CC-NC-ND license, which is not compatible with our policy. Not all images on Flickr are allowed on Commons, only those licensed CC-BY and CC-BY-SA, but not CC..NC and CC..ND. --Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MEP official photographs copyright

Hello, sorry to bother you. I was looking at the official Member of the European Parliament photos. For example, let's take the photograph of the President of the European Parliament David Sassoli https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/official-portrait-of-ep-president-david-sassoli-9th-parliamentary-term_SASSOLI_David_official_portrait_p As you can see, there is no license listed, however the only copyright requirement is listed as "Identification of origin mandatory" which I understand to be equivalent to a CC BY generic license. Would you think I'm allowed to upload it to Wikimedia Commons? And if so, which license should I choose? Thanks, best regards GiAbTankred (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GiAbTankred,

it might be read as you did. There has been a lot of back and forth w. EP images in the past. I would say, just do it. The upload might be contested and requested for deletion. But there is a basis for considering it sufficiently free. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. GiAbTankred (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done: File:Official portrait of David Sassoli, president of the European Parliament.jpg GiAbTankred (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this image removed?

This image literally has no copyright and is considered a public domain image. Ordnerud (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think the image has no copyright? Everything above a low COM:TOO is copyrighted. The video was created in 2017 and its creator is still alive. In addition: Different laws apply to Wikipedia/Commons than to the press. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is a screenshot from a video uploaded online in December 2017 by a mass murderer located in Norway (no:Espen Andersen Bråthen) who recently murdered five innocent people. The creator has not copyrighted the video, and according to COM:Norway "Photographs that depict a person cannot be reproduced or displayed publicly without the consent of the person depicted, except when [..] the image has a current and general interest", and the image and person is clearly a current and general interest. Ordnerud (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, there seem to be a lot of misunderstandings. 1) In very former times you may have lost your civil rights when being convicted for certain crimes. AFAIK, this no longer happens, and surely not in Europe. 2) A creator does not need to "copyright" a work, whatever you mean by that. The copyright is with him automatically. He can give it up in certain jurisdictions, but that requires a separate legal act. 3) The statement, which you cite, has nothing to do with copyright; it's about the personality-rights of the depicted person. --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know on which project you wanted to use this image. Some projects, such as :en-Wikipedia, have so-called exception policies, which allow the local use of unfree images, better known as "fair use". You should find out whether there is such a rule on your target project. However, such images need to be uploaded locally, not on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Semper Fidelis.jpg

Unfortunately, I don't know who designed this statuette, regards W2k2 (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then it cannot stay. It's a creative work and if the sculptor is not dead for >70 years, it's still in his copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it's a work photo? W2k2 (talk) 11:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "work photo"? As a general guidanec see Commons:Copyright rules by subject_matter#Art (copies of).--Túrelio (talk) 11:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:INNR okładka.jpg

The editor-in-chief of the Institute of National Remembrance Review will send consent to use the cover. It's enough? regards W2k2 (talk) 09:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if he is the creator or copyright-holder, yes. My main concern is about the real photo used on the cover. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The author of the cover photo is Franciszek Dąbrowski, deputy editor-in-chief W2k2 (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The editor-in-chief sent a letter of consent to the following address: permissions-pl@wikimedia.or W2k2 (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For both handling and further examining copyright violations. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a file

Hello @Túrelio, I hope you're doing well.

I nominated a file- File:Mowtushi Troye ( Mowtushi Binte Troye ).jpg- for missing permission. It is been 10 days from the uploader was notified and has crossed the 7-day mark. Thanks in advance for deleting. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 18:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bai Ling

Why was a photo provided by Bai Ling deleted. She is the copyright holder as it was a work for hire she arranged and owns. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:989:4280:3150:B039:FA51:C4D2:DA42 (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What file are you talking about? --Túrelio (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:National coats of arms of Lithuania in 1990-1991

This category allows to structure files by period. Why are you deleting it again? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was tagged for deletion[12] for being empty. Currently it is again tagged for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koh Talu.jpg

Sorry, I pasted the wrong URL in the coyvio tag. It should have been https://mgronline.com/travel/detail/9640000055181 . Not sure if the log item can somehow be corrected. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Mother Teresa for the Mother Teresa Center

+ LDM Dear Túrelio, Greetings of peace! I am contacting you from The Mother Teresa Center. The Mother Teresa of Calcutta Center (MTC) is a non–profit organization established and directed by the Missionaries of Charity (Religious Order Mother Teresa founded) to promote deeper knowledge of Mother Teresa’s life, work, holiness, spirituality and message through the preparation and publication of her authentic writings, distribution of devotional materials, maintaining of a website, etc. For more information, please visit www.motherteresa.org . The MTC is an extension of the Office of the Postulation of Mother Teresa which was responsible for bringing to completion her process of canonization (sainthood). We came across your beautiful two photos of Mother Teresa at a pro-life meeting in 1986 in Bonn, Germany on July 13, 1986 and are incredibly touched by the incredible way you have captured Mother in this image. We are contacting you now to request you to share a copy of these photos for our records and also permission to use if needed for our MTC projects to spread Mother Teresa’s message. We would also be interested in any other photos of Mother Teresa that you might have taken. Any information or detail about her is of great interest to us, much in the same way that the memories of their mother are precious to her children. Every photo, document or testimony forms an important piece in a mosaic in her rich life and the more pieces we put together the more complete the picture. We would be very grateful for your help in this and will abide by any conditions that you might have regarding our request. And here comes another special request. We would be delighted if you would be so kind (if and when your schedule permits it) to write for us a short testimony about your experience when you met Mother and took these photos. We would like details if possible: what were your impressions, and what was that interaction like and did she give you any message etc as we would like to keep this testimony of yours in our record. We do not use any other social media except email and so I would be so grateful if you could email me back as soon as possible with your reply. God bless you Sr. M. Callisita, MC Mother Teresa Center of the Missionaries of Charity www.motherteresa.org mtcadmin@motherteresa.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr. Preseilla (talk • contribs) 08:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongly deleted pictures

Hello, I noticed that you deleted several sourced pictures which were copyrighted under:Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Please restore these images and check the sources I provided. Such as:https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020-01162-2

I am also informing other administrators, if there was a possibility personal motivated activity. Thank you.Mev Shreb (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Northwards_migration_of_Basal_East_Asian_lineage_(model_A_and_B).jpg. Эlcobbola _talk 18:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mev Shreb, did you read your own talkpage? There you have all the required information why these images are not allow on Commons. "Open access" is a rather unspecific term, which does equal "free". Relevant are the terms of the permission (= license).

• File:East-Eurasian migration routes.jpg came from a paper[13], which expressedly states "This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND)." Per our policy COM:L neither CC-NC nor CC-ND licensed material is allowed on Commons.
• File:Basal East-Eurasian genetic tree.jpg came from the same paper[14].
• File:East-Eurasian and non-East-Eurasian ancestry (Eurasia).png came from a paper[15], which allows only non-commercial use[16], which is not allowed on Commons.
• File:Northwards migration of Basal East Asian lineage (model A and B).jpg came from a paper[17], which states "© Genetics 2016 / This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model", which is restricted to personal, non-commercial use[18].

All this information was made available to you before deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Commons

Following, the warnings that you have given me, I have noted them and will not repeat. The campaign I was involved in were not clear on the photos so I went ahead and uploaded. its still a learning process. Thank you for the corrections. My username is Faith Buyaki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faith Buyaki (talk • contribs) 09:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вознесенский Д.В.png

По какой причине Вы удалили изображение персоны которая опубликована в других источниках с правом распространения ? Если вы не читаете по-руски, то воспользуйтесь переводчиком. Считаю удаление не обоснованным, прошу привести статью в нормальное состояние — Preceding unsigned comment added by Вознесенский Д.С. (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not convinced that the source-site really has the right to release this photography without restrictions, if they can't even identify the photographer. AFAIK, copyright in Russia may last longer than 70 years pma, due to wartime-extension. So, for an image from 1936 you can't automatically assume it's in the public domain already. Please take your request to COM:UDR. May be my colleagues come to a different judgement. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Header - Copy.png

Could you have a look at this please? Does this meet the requirements for PD-text? If not, it's a copyvio (not own work; copied from https://aspectus.york.ac.uk/}}. Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

• File:Etnografiska museet Thai mask Vanadis 1884.jpg and two other images.

I am very sorry for the wrong deletion request due to my lack of confirmation. I apologize for the inconvenience. I will be very careful not to do anything like this. Please accept my apologies. Krorokeroro (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It was also my fault. --Túrelio (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Retrait du lien Claude_François_dessiné_par_Michel_Bourdais_en_1963.jpg, supprimé sur Commons par Túrelio ; motif : No permission since 16 Oct)

Bonjour Túrelio, Je viens d'apprendre que vous avez supprimé sur la page Claude François, le lien vers une photographie déposée par une personne nommée Kakupi. C'est très certainement avec juste raison. D'après ce que j'ai compris vous veillez à ce que les droits d'auteur soient respectés. Pour cela, je vous remercie.

Comme je suis l'auteur du dessin représenté sur cette photographie et que ce dessin est exposé au moulin de Dannemois, je ne vois aucun inconvénient à ce que cette photographie prise par Kakupi soit publiée. Pouvez-vous m'indiquer la marche à suivre pour donner mon autorisation. Je vous en remercie. Je vous souhaite une bonne soirée. --Michel Bourdais (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Michel,

as my French is no longer sufficient, I need to use english. That's a good surprise that you are indeed the painter of the portrait in File:Claude François dessiné par Michel Bourdais en 1963.jpg. To make it easy, just write an informal email from your official/business email address to permissions-fr@wikimedia.org (OTRS) in which you state that you are the painter of the portrait depicted in File:Claude François dessiné par Michel Bourdais en 1963.jpg and that you confirm the free license, which the photographer has choosen for this photo. This way you give permission only for this photography, while retaining full copyright over the painting itself. Bonsoir --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Túrelio, Thank you for your prompt response. I will immediately follow your advice. I wish you a good afternoon. --Michel Bourdais (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Persitam Tamban.png

Hello and thanks for the response, how do I change the license of the football club logo? so that the logo is not deleted --Siddicq (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the problem is that there is no permission for this logo. Images on Instagram are not free. Only the author or the rightsholder can issue a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Bayat headshot jpg

Why did you pull this down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbrcomm (talk • contribs) 23:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is copyvio-suspected[19], as you had been notified on your talkpage User talk:Lbrcomm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File restoration

Could you please restore this deleted file File:Flag of Bulgaria (1948).svg, Thx. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 08:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are aware that it was deleted as a duplicate of the remaining File:Flag of Bulgaria (1946-1948).svg? I can temporarily undelete it, if you need anything from the data/description. But a permanent restoration should go through COM:UDR.--Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: I changed my mind, i really need it for something, please undelete it, thx. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exxentric speedy deletion

Hi, I just noted that you marked two images for speedy deletion:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LegExx_Regular_Leg_Extension2.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:18282_LegExx_3.jpg

I represent Exxentric AB who is the original copyright owner, and we have licensed them under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. What can we do to avoid their deletion? Thanks, /OriginalFlywheel (talk) 11:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the company resp. their legal dep. should send a permission for all those uploads for which they are either the author/photographer or the copyright-holder. Use the template on Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, add all concerned filenames, give the name/abbreviation of the choosen license (if the default in the template), sign and date it and send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Email will not be published, but can only be seen by our OTRS-volunteers. If they have sent such a permission, you may add {{OTRS pending}} to each image.--Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for clear advice, we'll fix this later today. /OriginalFlywheel (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now done. /OriginalFlywheel (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regrettably a colleague has deleted both files already. Don't worry, the OTRS-volunteer who processes this case, will notify me or the deleting admin to undelete the images, when he/she has evaluated the permission. So, as of now, you don't need to do anything. --Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, any chance we could have Category:KPulley and Category:LegExx recreated too?

Category:LegExx is currently empty. It could be easily re-created (or undeleted) when populated. However, "LexExx" and "KPulley" sounds to me like a proprietary product-name. While such cat-names may not be generally forbidden, they might be an unwise choice, as they may be considered as advertising. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hiddenfigures.jpg

"Something" is now present at the page, coupled with unpleasant accusations. It does appear that the uploader may have sent OTRS permission. The files is of Emunah La-Paz (who is the uploader using their name V Hubbard) standing in front of a posted of the movie "Hidden Figures". Timtrent (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No matter. It has been deleted by another admin. Sorry to bother you Timtrent (talk) 08:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Explodium

I'm the creator to these logo. I'm the graphist of Explodium. 2A02:8440:8340:B16E:C9BD:47D3:B61B:A0E6 10:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are Ascol57 (talk · contribs) and refering to File:Logo d'Explodium v1.png: please log-in when posting. As explained on your talkpage, you resp. the legal dep. of your company needs to send a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pics

Would you delete all the pictures I have uploaded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrs99 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, are you requesting me to delete them? --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Female figure.

Hello. This image Jordan Wolfson(NY.1980).jpg was taken in Stedelijk Museum (Amsterdam), and it's not marked as copyright violation. The image of the page Female Figure reunites exactly the same conditions but it's considered copyright violation. It doesn't make sense because both images have the same conditions. Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. Both have the same problem. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PD & CC Commons files

This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

14:35, 18 November 2021 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page Category:PD & CC Commons files (empty. Then we can close CFD) (thank)

you have been deleted this category, but I've worked with logos in this. How can I find logos, categorized earlier in it?--Albedo (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Category:PD & CC Commons files was empty before I deleted it. If you see a legitimate need for its existance, just recreate it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

some of template categorized into. what of?--Albedo (talk) 09:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its latest content was:

{{Speedy|empty. Then we can close CFD}} {{Category for discussion|1=Category:PD & CC Commons files|month=08|year=2021}}Lots of totals [[Category:Public domain]] [[Category:CC-BY-SA-3.0]] --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Albedo is interested rather in where the files went that used to be in that category. @Albedo: Unless you know the file names, I'm afraid there is no easy way of tracking the new categories. Technically speaking, category pages do not keep a record of the content in the category itself because categorising actually happens on the individual file pages. By the way, when you add categories to a file that do not yet exist (red link), please be sure to also create the new category page. De728631 (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goblin Market, revisited and maybe restored?

I had you delete some files, I think they were put into the 2029 stuff. I just read s:en:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#USA_publication,_no_copyright_notice and it seems that having you delete them was premature and wrong.

I am not going to wait for more "votes" as the proof of compliance is there, and I am wondering what you (or another admin, of your referral or discretion) would need from me to restore the files (in addition to the apology to the extra work that is due to you from me).--RaboKarbakian (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

as they seem to have been deleted, though on your request, under the assumption of being unfree, I would ask you to open this as a case on COM:UDR, just state shortly the facts/events and link to the mentioned Wikisource-discussion. Also you should add a list of the affected files. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I watched a little when they were removed, following links and such. They were put in some cat for 2029. Years ago, I heard/read that all "deleted" files like this went to some German server dedicated to this kind of thing. So, I thought they could just be put back. But I have been wrong about so many things!

If it will be easier for me to reupload them, I can do this.

I will go to that link and follow the instructions there, but can "consensus" over ride "legal" and "illegal"?--RaboKarbakian (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Scans_for_Goblin_Market As you suggested.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murmansk Puppet Theater

Hello!

• File:Евгений Суханов.jpg
• File:Владимир Пьянков.jpg
• File:Натялья Петрунина.jpg
• File:Валентина Варшавская.jpg

It's cc-by 4.0. See below at site: "Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0".Insider (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

ok. File:Владимир Пьянков.jpg, File:Натялья Петрунина.jpg and File:Валентина Варшавская.jpg could be traced to the source https://www.murmankukla.ru/. Though, there remains the question, who is the author? For the first image we have no source found, only the credit in the metadata. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion. The author is also the administrator of the theater's website - Пётр Макаров (Peter Makarov). Insider (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Insider, I've no conditionally restored File:Евгений Суханов.jpg. Please add all available evidence for its legitimacy to the file-page. --Túrelio (talk) 11:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Status

What's https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%B1%D8%B3%D9%85%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A8%D9%86_%D8%BA%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%85.jpg status ? permission granted or no ? CorrectionKSA (talk) 23:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not involved in this process. You may ask at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic map of Turkey

Hello, I am involved in a content dispute about the following map [20]. I have reverted the map in a version where its legend and the colors used in the map were coherent with each other and were in accordance with the cited source. A user has repeadelty reverted me without engaging in any kind of discussion. I have asked multiple times that user to explain themselves on the talk page but to no avail. Could the file be somehow protected? Ahmet Q. (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahmet Q.,

I have fully protected it for 2 weeks. Let's hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ahmet Q. (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glòria Sabaté i Marín.jpg

Hola, El dia 22 de novembre de 2021 vau esborrar la fotografia de la següent pàgina de la Viquipèdia sobre Glòria Sabaté i Marín. https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gl%C3%B2ria_Sabat%C3%A9_i_Mar%C3%ADn Aquesta imatge és una selfie que es va fer la mateixa autora i ens la va cedir, renunciant als drets d'autor. Abans de penjar la foto li vam deixar clar que al deixar-nos publicar-la renunciava als drets d'autor i hi va estar d'acord, així que et demanem que la tornis a penjar.

Esperem la teva resposta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saoovf (talk • contribs)

Hi,

this image had been uploaded with the claims "source=Enviament personal" and "author=Glòria Sabaté i Marín" by User:ToniAlvarez.

In such cases the (true) author or the rightsholder needs to send a statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (COM:VRTS). On the VRTS-page you find a permission-template, which is available in different languages. What is important in such a case ist that the person who provided the image, gives a legally clear statement whether he/she really is the photographer him/herself or, if not, that he/she has obtained full rights from the photographer. The permission needs to be send by the photographer or rightsholder directly to VRTS, no forwarding accepted. --Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015, Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you had already uploaded a file this year, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--13:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files that have wrongfully been deleted

I need some help, please.

These files were nominated for deletion and were deleted: File:The Chosen - A toast at the wedding banquet.jpg, File:The Chosen - Disciples at the wedding banquet.jpg, File:The Chosen - Jesus at wedding with kids.jpg, and File:The Chosen - Simon and Andrew on Galilee.jpg.

And the following have been noon nominated for deletion: File:The Chosen - Nicodemus talks with Mary.jpg, File:The Chosen - Simon fishes at night.jpg, File:The Chosen - Nicodemus and Jesus.jpg, File:The Chosen - Jesus touches the leper.jpg, and File:The Chosen - BTS Roman Authority.jpg.

It would appear that they're just lock, stock, and barreled copyrighted, but each file from the season one section is CC-BY-SA, as noted on each upload of the official Chosen website. It's kind of hidden, but it's there. On each upload, click the links on the source (which leads to the official Chosen TV show website), then, click the arrows at the top left hand corner of the photo, and it'll show more info on the picture, and clearly display the CC-BY-SA license.

Because of this, may these be undeleted, please? StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addition

May this file be undeleted as well, please? (File:Dallas Jenkins.jpeg)

The licensing proving that it's free from the source is hidden too, like the other Chosen publicity material on Commons. Here's the source link: https://www.press.thechosen.tv/?pgid=judjmpl7-4f2d78a7-a342-4220-b154-b6379a88c8b5

Thanks again! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! I appreciate it. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 11:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

@Túrelio: Can you take a look at this? Do you think all these files should be deleted? Or we should decide case by case? Ltn12345 (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

"case by case" might not be necessary, but they should be divided into groups: monks, pretty young lady (model), praying girls, artist. As you mentioned "ethical issues", likely personality rights: I have the impression that nearly all depicted persons (except the monks) are models, not snapshots of ordinary people, even the standing praying girls. So, this is likely not a relevant issue. Currently the main problem for their usability (and thereby being in scope) is the lack of a (meaningful) description. IMO, the images of the praying/meditating monks and the praying girls are potentially useful, also the image of the incense-pot. The artist behind the desk might be, if used in an article. --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio Your description "pretty young lady" is a bit worrying. Perhaps it would be better to use a more neutral description like "woman posing in various situations". Brianjd (talk) 08:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bunch of deletions

Please could you delete every single one of these images from a known vandal and sock puppet on Wikipedia. Every single one of these images is breaking copyright. Thank you.

Images to delete: File:Charles Albanese.jpg, File:Ripper Crew.jpg, File:Edward Spreitzer.jpg, File:Andrew Kokoraleis.jpg, File:Robin Gecht.jpg, File:Thomas Kokoraleis.jpg, File:I11kzAIfPPAAAAAASUVORK5CYII - Copy.png, File:Eddie Mays.jpg, File:Flippen.jpg, File:Smithk.jpg. Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 21:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. He added these two images a while ago as well: File:Turpinmugshot.jpg, File:Ronald Turpin.jpg, Not 100% sure if they violate copyright but I suspect they do. They were created in 1962 so clearly the copyright tag added is not correct on those images because they were created after 1949. Inexpiable (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Account still making copyright violations / Deletion requests

Hi. Sorry to bother you but this user is still making copyright violations and has uploaded one of the images you deleted again: File:Charles-albanese-prison-mug.jpg.

In addition the other images they added a while ago: File:Ronald Turpin.jpg, File:Turpinmugshot.jpg, are also copyright violations. The tags they added to these pages are not correct because the images were made after 1949 and the publisher was not a person and therefore has not died. Could all be deleted? Perhaps user be banned as well? Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 08:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashley alexiss smith.jpg

Hi,

I just realized that you deleted File:Ashley alexiss smith.jpg as a copyright violation after I created Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ashley Alexiss Smith 1.jpg. I don't know if this is the same file you already deleted but uploaded under a different name. -- Whpq (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I actually deleted that image twice today; was uploaded by Guffens (talk · contribs). The one in your DR is a different photo, though the uploader is the same. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. thx Whpq (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a picture with my camera and worked on the file. So I think the picture/file is mine. But if you say so I leave it. Guffens (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by user:Артемий Булычёв

Hi Túrelio, you've recently deleted some of this young user's uploads. Please note, that all other ones (except maybe this) are clear copyvios as well. --188.123.231.42 08:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung eines Bildes

Lieber Túrelio,

ich würde mich gerne erkundigen, weshalb das von mir hochgeladene Bild (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wiccan_Priestess.jpg) entfernt wurde. Der Quelle des Bildes war die Lizenz zu entnehmen. Das Bild ist als CC0 gekennzeichnet, somit habe ich sowohl laut CreaticeCommons, als auch laut Wikimedia das Recht, dieses Bild hier auf Wikipedia zu nutzen. Zitat des Urhebers: "Free for commercial use. No attribution required." Die Lizenz, als auch die Quelle des Bildes hatte ich verlinkt - die Person die ursprünglich das Bild zur Löschung vorgeschlagen hatte, hat sich sogar nach Nachfrage von mir entschuldigt, falls ein Fehler vorliege.

Ich bitte um Klärung dieses Konflikts und würde mich über die Wiederherstellung freuen, da ich das Bild in einem meiner Artikel auf Wikipedia verwenden möchte. --Ruhrgur (talk) 21:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ruhrgur und Túrelio. Hierbei gilt es zu beachten, dass Pixabay, wo das Bild herstammt, seit dem 9. Januar 2019 keine CC0-Lizenzen mehr vergibt, sondern eine eigene "Pixabay-Lizenz" aufgelegt hat. Nach einer längeren Diskussion wurde hier bei Commons damals beschlossen, dass die Pixabay-Lizenz nicht frei genug ist und dass nur noch solche Bilder von Pixabay hier hochgeladen werden dürfen, die dort noch vor dem Lizenzwechsel unter CC0 veröffentlicht wurden. Wie man auf der Quellseite sieht, wurde dieses Bild aber am 30.10.2019 bei Pixabay eingestellt ist damit nicht unter CC0 verfügbar. Siehe dazu auch {{Pixabay}}. De728631 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Ruhrgur,

sorry, ich hatte die ursprüngliche Löschbegründung desjenigen, der das Bild zur SLA markiert hatte, nicht korrigiert bzw. um das ergänzt, was mein Kollege dir dankenswerterweise oben erläutert hat. Dadurch stand auf deiner Disku nicht der eigentliche Löschgrund. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by Manishrajputphotography

Hi Túrelio, I notice that you have deleted at least one file uploaded by Manishrajputphotography (talk · contribs), File:Food Photography Service in Delhi — Best Service At Lowest Rates.jpg. Today I came across multiple additional files from this uploader that appear to have exactly the same issue that led you to delete the prior file: "No sign of CC-BY-SA license on given link", manishrajput.com. Perhaps you could have a look? Thank you. Marbletan (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte um Abschluss/Entscheidung zu Löschdiskussionen

Hallo Túrelio,

ich bitte um Mithilfe zum Abschluss von zwei Löschdiskussionen:

1. Staffelsee alte Karte
2. Vanuatu Gazetteer

In beiden Fällen geht es um von mir hochgeladene Dateien, die anfänglich von einem Bot zur Schnelllöschung markiert wurden, aus unterschiedlichen Gründen. In beiden Fällen wandelte ich den Schnelllöschantrag in einem normalen Löschantrag um. Im Ersten Fall ist dabei seit Anfang September nichts mehr passiert (außer mir noch eine Stimme für Behalt, keine für Löschen). Im zweiten Fall ist ein Löschantrag offensichtlich unbegründet, da die Lizenz klar im Dokumenet angegeben ist. Das ist zeitlich ein aktueller Fall, aber hier gibt es m.E. nichts mehr zu diskutieren. Viele Grüße,--Ratzer (talk) 12:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Objektbeschreibungen im Germanischen Nationalmuseum in Nürnberg

Hallo Turelio,

nachdem wir im Jahr 2019 in einer ähnlichen Angelegenheit miteinander korrespondiert haben, möchte ich dich bitten, hier Stellung zu nehmen. Vielen Dank. --Schubbay (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<stöhn>, ich denke, das ist - als 1. Schritt - im Forum gut aufgehoben. Du könntest die Diskussionsbeteiligung aber etwas erleichtern, in dem du dort 1 typisches Beispielfoto (wie File:2021 — Zweite Julireise Mateus2019 Batch (176).jpg) sichtbar plazierst. Denn sich durch die volle Kategorie, mit zudem ganz unterschiedlichen Problemstellungen, zu klicken, wirkt eher abschreckend. Ich tue mich mit Schöpfungshöhe-Fragen etwas schwer und genau darum geht es hier m.E. Deshalb würde ich auch die Überschrift auf dem Forum ändern oder ergänzen: z.B. Schöpfungshöhe oder nicht? --Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die schnelle Antwort. Die URL für das Beispielbild habe ich eingefügt und den Text meiner Anfrage etwas moderiert. Ein Zweifel an der Schöpfungshöhe der Objektbeschreibungen besteht bei mir nicht (bei den von mir damals (1919) eingestellten Pflanzenbeschreibungen der Innenräume des Ökologisch Botanischen Gartens der Universität Bayreuth, die ich wegen des Nichtvorliegens der Panoramafreiheit löschen lassen musste, ergab sich vergleichsweise die Frage nach der Schöpfungshöhe ebenfalls nicht). --Schubbay (talk) 13:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for converting {{dupe}} to DR

I wasn't aware of the limitation on the file type. I'll open DRs in the future. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

How come u removed my logo? It is not copy right since club allow everyone to use online. At least u should ask me. WNkh (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you were notified on your talkpage. Nearly everything (except if very old) is copyrighted. Allowing "to use it online" is not the same as a free license, such as required by our policy COM:L. The creator or legal rightsholder needs to send a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) to be acceptable on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete this image of Sadhana Ji ?

It's My Personal Colourized Images I'm Copyright Holder of This image 2409:4063:4D8B:1D11:0:0:24CA:BE02 12:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Log-in and provide the filename. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Mother Teresa in Bonn

Dear Sir, I found a beautiful photo of Mother Teresa of Calcutta (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/MotherTeresa_090.jpg) of your authorship, with an annotation that I can ask for a higher resolution photo. If possible, please send me this photo in the highest possible resolution. I would like to use them in the charity work of the Polish Movement of Solidarity with the Poor of the Third World "Maitri" (in publications, leaflets, on the Internet). Mother Teresa, through her example, became an inspiration for the creation of our Movement, she is our saint patron, for many years we have intensively supported her works in Calcutta, we draw from her spirituality... In one word, she is a very important person for us. Thank you in advance and best regards :) --Muzyk98 (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replied per email. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PasayEmi.jpg and File:RAdvincula.jpg

Those photos are mine. I took it using my iPhone 6s. 152.32.112.250 09:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you say the 1st one is from https://mb.com.ph/2021/07/27/mayor-emi-bike-lane-will-help-reduce-air-pollution? And why does the 2nd one carry Facebook/Instagram code? --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ponytails in the United States

You deleted this category under CSD C2 because it was empty. The reason it was empty is because Ruff tuff cream puff emptied it using Cat-a-lot shortly before your deletion. I think these edits should be reverted, and the category undeleted. We already have Category:Ponytails in Ukraine. @Ruff tuff cream puff: Why did you empty this category? Brianjd (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• We should probably get rid of that one, too. There is no point to a category tree dividing images of ponytails by country. Ponytails look the same no matter what country they are located in. You can't tell what country a ponytail is located in by looking at it. There is no one out there searching for pictures of ponytails unique to one country. People who are looking for pictures of ponytails do not want or need to search through geographical categories to see all of the pictures. But please, if you find it useful, recreate it, I'll leave it alone. Thanks, have fun. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd, if there are enough, I would guess more than 5, images of ponytail-carrying people associated with the US, i.e. either per description or ideally per the image setting or a flag, you could recreate the cat. Just as a reminder, Cats are created to help people to find images. However, a subdivision makes usually little sense if the overall population is small. --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I learned about this because my watchlist had 23 entries in a row where Ruff tuff cream puff removed files from this category. And those files all come from just one event, so there are plenty of files that could fill this category. But I accept their point that these categories may not be useful; I have nominated the other one for discussion. Brianjd (talk) 04:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]