Hosta

This user talk page is for discussion with user Milenioscuro. If you ask me at this page, I will answer here. If I ask you at another page, I will answer there! Please sign your message: --~~~~ Add a new section at the end of page, please!

File:Colombia Bogotá location map.png

84.250.17.211 18:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pernambuco

Good afternoon, Milenioscuro. Initially, I do not speak English, so this message was made with a translator. Regarding the image, I know that it gave that problem with the coordinates, but it had loaded that new version because, first of all, the micro and mesoregions were extinct and yet the microregion lines were superimposed and still visible on the map. Note that in the new version that had loaded they no longer appear. Secondly, I find it unnecessary to show the south of Rio Grande do Norte state on that map. Another reason is that some counties were with the outdated division, for example, Terra Nova. One more reason: the division between Pernambuco and Ceará had a change, according IBGE. I also did not understand why the colors did not conform to the conventions. As I do not like to get into edit war, I thought it best to come here to your discussion page to reach some consensus. I await an answer. Marquinhos ^talk 16:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior: Hola Marquinhos. Puede hablar portugués con confianza, yo entiendo un poco y lo que no, pues lo traduzco con el traductor. Hubiera preferido que antes de subir el archivo se comunicara conmigo, para saber que hacer y que modificar. Usted tiene razón en varias cosas, por ejemplo el tamaño del mapa (que muestra zonas sin información útil) y la desactualización de las divisiones municipales. Con respecto a eso, apenas me entero de que las micro y macrorregiones dejaron de existir, quizás eso implique que en los demás mapas también deban quitarse. Y bueno, si, los mapas tipo location tienen unas convenciones que se usan desde el 2008, para mantener una uniformidad constante entre los mapas; pueden verse aquí o aquí.

Hoy o mañana hago las modificaciones pertinentes en el mapa ya con los arreglos mencionados por usted y por mi, que pase buena tarde. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: obrigado pela resposta. Utilizei este esquema de cores mostrado nos últimos mapas que carreguei. Marquinhos ^talk 19:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

Request

Can you make the maps for the divisions of Balochistan, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan as you did this for Amritsar and many other districts of India (shown below):

I requested you for this because these divisions have no proper and true maps on commons. I can give you the list of these divisions in a short way if you agreed and needed. I hope you will pay attention to my request. Thanks! DdBbCc22 (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DdBbCc22: I have a couple of queued requests, but yes, I could make them. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: If not yet, after a while. Any time period if possible? They are total approximately 25 maps. DdBbCc22 (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DdBbCc22: Hi, I'm starting to make your request, but I have a doubt with the old "Tribal Areas", ¿were they divided into divisions or were they a single unit? and the same goes for Azad Kashmir. I can not find maps online to clarify the situation. --Milenioscuro (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Tocantins

Hola, Milenioscuro. Por favor, puede verificar el mapa de dos ciudades del estado de Tocantins en Brasil? Xambioá y Piraquê están con sus mapas divergentes de Google Maps. Gracias por su atención. --Harly~commonswiki (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Harly~commonswiki: en ese caso debería hablar con el usuario Raphael.lorenzeto quien fue el que hizo los mapas de esos municipios. --Milenioscuro (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

Distrito de Barrancabermeja

¡Hola! Pues eso, que ahora resulta que Barrancabermeja es un distrito Alguien editó Municipios de Colombia y resultó ser cierto. Por si tienes tiempo de editar la imagen de la derecha (y similares). Un abrazo, --·×ald·^es 20:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corregir mapa de límites entre Venezuela y Colombia

Muy buenas tardes Milenioscuro.

Le pido el favor de corregir el siguiente mapa:

La razón es que ni Colombia ni Venezuela han definido sus límites marítimos. Aunque sí lo hicieron con los límites del territorio continental con el Tratado de 1941, el Archipiélago de Los Monjes sigue siendo una zona en disputa entre ambos países, y usted ubicó a dichas islas en el lado venezolano.

Le pido el favor de eliminar la línea divisoria en el mar entre estos dos países y poner que es un territorio en disputa. Muchas gracias por su atención. Saludos.

--Debray05 (talk) 18:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brazil Rondonia location map.svg

Hello, Milenioscuro. There are some errors on this map and on its derived maps. The errors are on the cities of Costa Marques, São Francisco do Guaporé, Seringueiras, São Miguel do Guaporé and Nova Brasilândia d'Oeste. I tried to fix them, but I don't have your skills. 'XD Can you fix them? Att Bielrugero (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS: There's a Brazilian institute called IBGE, a database of all states and municipalities in Brazil, includind maps. The link of Costa Marques city is this. If you use the search box, you'll find maps of all cities. It's in Portuguese, but you'll be able to understand.

@Bielrugero:  Done, sin embargo dos cosas:

1. El mapa que realicé es un derivado de uno que ya existía en commons, no es el "original" por decirlo de alguna manera.
2. No voy a actualizar ningún otro mapa.

--Milenioscuro (talk) 13:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¡Una Wikiestrella para ti!

		Wikiestrella del trabajador
		Por tu gran trayectoria en Wikimedia. ¡Gran trabajo, y continúa así!. Atentamente: David C. S. 22:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC), Puyo - Ecuador.[reply]

¡Una Wikiestrella para ti!

		Wikiestrella del diseñador gráfico
		Por tus magníficos trabajos en los campos de la cartografía y la heráldica. ¡Felicitaciones!. Atentamente: David C. S. 22:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC), Puyo - Ecuador.[reply]

Fort Ross

Buenos dias ! ¿Sobre este mapa, pueden agregar "Fort Ross" en California (ruso de 1812 a 1841)? Ver [1] Gracias ! --Claude Zygiel (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Claude Zygiel: Buen día. En este mapa se incluye todas las posesiones del Impero Ruso, en el mapa ortográfico no es posible pues está centrado en Asia y no permite ver América del Norte más al sur de Canadá. --Milenioscuro (talk) 12:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno. Hasta luego, --Claude Zygiel (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

Administrative Division

Please DO NOT remove those files from Category:Maps of prefecture-level divisions of China, thanks. Chk2011 (talk) 08:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chk2011: ¿why not? --Milenioscuro (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: it is a good categorization to put similar files in one category. If you put those files just in independent categories one by one with "Maps of xxx", it is weakening the function of category. It is OK to add the category to the files. If you think the name of the category is not precise, please request renaming. e.g. Administrative maps by prefecture-level divisions of China. Make it simple, the original goal to create that category is to put all similar files in one category. Chk2011 (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Actualización: Distritos de la Provincia de Chiriquí

Hola Milenioscuro, observé que en el 2017 actualizaste el mapa político-administrativo de la provincia de Chiriquí, al añadir el distrito de Tierras Altas. También actualizaste el distrito anteriormente mencionado y el distrito de Bugaba, del cual fue segregado para crear este distrito. Sin embargo, los mapas de los otros distritos de la provincia no han sido actualizados con el distrito de Tierras Altas. Podrías actualizarlos ya que fuiste el último en actualizar estos archivos. GiankM. M 10:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Territorial evolution maps of China

China in 1936-49

Hello, thank you very much for the two China maps you made, but there are a few serious problems

In map File:China in 1936.svg, Germany lost Qingdao in Shandong long after the defeat of World War I, and Weihai was returned to China by Britain in 1930. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.177.229.13 (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
In map File:China in 1949.svg, although Mongolia was recognized by China in 1946, the boundary between the two countries was not determined. It was not stipulated in the treaty until 1962. the dashed lines should be used as in other regions. https://zh.m.wikisource.org/zh-hans/中华人民共和国和蒙古人民共和国边界条约 —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.177.229.13 (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The main source of the maps is this page: 透过地图看历史 1949年-1999年中国行政区划的变迁. You can see for yourself the sources in the description of the files, almost all of them shows the border China-Mongolia like in my maps. --Milenioscuro (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

• 

  Mongolia in 1932

• 

  China in 1947

China in 1911.svg

这幅地图的边界有很多问题，新疆和云南的最西部并不是按照中华民国初年的官方边界描绘的，多余的部分只是被KMT的国民政府声称，而不是1912～28年的北洋政府，请注意这两个政府声称边界的不同，请予以更正. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 47.74.222.169 (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Si sabe chino, este artículo puede explicar por qué el mapa de KMT es diferente del mapa de la República de China en 1912. http://history.m4.cn/2015-12/1294849.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 47.74.222.169 (talk) 05:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 

  China in 1922

• 

  China in 1926

• 

  甚至在国民政府执政的1930s，边界地图，也没有像后来那样夸张

He aquí la comparativa de dos mapas que hice de 1911, uno de ellos tiene anotaciones que explican los cambios territoriales a principios del siglo XX y el otro en su descripción tiene las fuentes de donde se sacó las fronteras dibujadas. --Milenioscuro (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 

  China, 1911

• 

  China, 1911, con anotaciones

 Answered

Tiene autoridad el mapa de Asia publicado oficialmente por Encyclopædia Britannica en 1911. A excepción de Aksai Chin, es coherente con el mapa publicado por la dinastía Qing.

Obviamente, todavía hay muchos problemas con el mapa de China en 1911. ¿Se pueden marcar las áreas en disputa con líneas punteadas como File:China in 1936.svg? Los mapas oficiales de la dinastía Qing que puedo buscar no incluyen Yunnan y la parte más occidental de Xinjiang. Los primeros mapas que se pueden encontrar para incluir estas áreas aparecieron en la década de 1930. 1905 年版《大清帝国全图》 Tanqixiang map Qing 1908 Además, la es:línea McMahon no involucra la frontera entre Myanmar y China. El gobierno tibetano no ha gobernado Yunnan antes, El tratado de 1914 solo fue firmado entre los gobiernos británico y tibetano.

Si, está bien, puedo dibujar las fronteras en líneas punteadas para clarificar que esas zonas estaban en disputa entre China y el Imperio británico. --Milenioscuro (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROC vs PRC.svg requires updating

Hi Milenioscuro,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:ROC vs PRC.svg is out of date. ROC now has three additional municipalities in Taiwan: New Taipei, Taoyuan, and Tainan. Could you update it? Thanks again. Ythlev (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

C’ouvi dizer…

Não tens mais nada que fazer, é? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tuvalkin: don't cry dude, you can rename it whenever you want. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

Re: Objects

I am not sure how to fix these objects, so I'm sorry if I got confused. If it was John Q Poppy's version you were editing, then I apologize, as he has several wrongly highlighted counties on his version; I mistook it as you restoring them. Jerome501 (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)  Answered[reply]

File:Map of Siam (territorial cessions).svg

Hello, Milenioscuro,

thank you for your excellent map which is a lot clearer and esthetically pleasing than the grainy gif maps that were used before. However, I am somewhat irritated by both the date and the extent of the cession of Shan States to Britain. You cite David K. Wyatt's A Short History of Thailand (2003) as your source, but in that book I find nothing about a cession to Britain taking place in 1893. According to my information, the British actually took control of the Shan States as early as 1885, after the w:Third Anglo-Burmese War.

The so-called Chinese Shan states in what is now Yunnan, however, were never British. Britain explicitly confirmed their belonging to China in the 1894 border agreement, fixing their border along the Nam Lam river between "Kiang Hung" (Jinghong) that belonged to China and "Kiang Tong" (Kengtung) belonging to Britain, that still is the border between China and Myanmar today. But even before that agreement, Britain had no control over southern Yunnan, which is why these territories were called "Chinese Shan states". The area west of the Mekong was only considered Britain's sphere of influence vis-à-vis France according to the 1896 Upper Mekong agreement, while the eastern bank belonged to the French sphere (thus having territories east of the Mekong shaded in red is quite odd). But that deal does not regard territorial cessions of Siam.

In Wyatt's map of "Thai territorial losses, 1785–1909", the Shan states are not regarded at all (neither the Burmese nor the Chinese ones). Probably because Siam never held actual territorial control over them. The Siamese claim to overlordship over the Shan states was rather of theoretical nature. Perhaps, it would be best to follow Wyatt's example and ignore the Shan states in your map. At least, the year 1893 should be changed to 1885 (which still would be slightly misleading, because Siam did not cede the Shan states to Britain in 1885, as it did not control them anyway; Britain simply took them). And the "Chinese Shan states" should not be included in the British possessions. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 12:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Iguaçu in Brazil (1943).svg

català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iguaçu in Brazil (1943).svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ixocactus (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of the Rattanakosin Kingdom.svg

File:Map of the Rattanakosin Kingdom.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ eesti ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ română ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ shqip ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙

Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Siam (territorial cessions).svg

File:Map of Siam (territorial cessions).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ eesti ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ română ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ shqip ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙

Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 22:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bssr gerb 1920.png

Hello. Change the upper one (БССР -> ССРБ). And I still saw an inaccuracy. Below the stems are white, must yellow. File:Emblem of the Byelorussian SSR (1920).svg Валко (talk) 04:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, don't change File:Emblem of the Byelorussian SSR (1920).svg, done File:Герб Социалистической Советской Республики Белоруссии.svg Валко (talk) 04:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)  Not done[reply]

File:Emblem of the Byelorussian SSR (1927-1937).svg

Hi. Change the motto, in the Belarusian language since 1927 it looked like: "Пралятары усiх краiн, злучайцеся!" (before 1927 it was:"Пролетарыi усiх краеу, злучайцеся!") 95.110.103.175 02:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Compare

• 

  original

• 

  svg

Валко (talk) 16:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)  Not done[reply]

Request Morocco map

Hi Milenioscuro, If you have free time. could you make an SVG version of this map? but with the wikipedia map theme, you know something like this: and also maps highlighting each region in the map? thank you.--أنس (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 

  2015 wikipedia themed map

• 

  1971  Done

@أنس:  Done (general map). I dont know the names of the regions, so I dont make the highlighted maps. --Milenioscuro (talk) 21:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir

I noticed that your otherwise excellent location map of the Kashmir region is in need of some updating to show the boundaries of the current 14 districts in Gilgit-Baltistan instead of the previous 10 districts there, and also to show an updated boundary between Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashmir_location_map.svg

The following two maps show that updated information.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Azad_Kashmir_Location_Map.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pakistan_Gilgit_Baltistan_location_map.svg

Atelerixia (talk) 04:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)  Done[reply]

File:Troncal del caribe.svg

File:Troncal del caribe.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ eesti ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ română ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ shqip ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙

Cjp24 (talk) 18:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

China provinces map request

Hello Milenioscuro

I saw your wonderful maps on this wikipage, and I was wondering if you had all of these same maps but with Japan fully displayed on them, preferably as an SVG file.

If these maps were available, can I have your permission to use them as a template to make maps of my own about the Chinese Warlord Era (1916-1928)? These maps will run from 1911 until at least 1937 and maybe through to 1949.

Thanks in advance,

FatMax1492 (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FatMax1492: You can use the maps as you wish, as long as you credit me. All maps contain full Japan (and other territories), if you open them with inkscape you can see them. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: Thanks for your response! I tried opening them with GIMP before, but it didn't show full Japan. I'll try Inkscape and check if full Japan is on there. FatMax1492 (talk) 07:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

Pakistani provinces

Your maps on Pakistani provinces have been great. I am trying to create accurate relief maps for these provinces, and so I need to know their coordinates to get the right data. However, it seems that the coordinates listed on the Modules pages for some of these provinces (Punjab, Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunwa for instance) are not accurate since there is a significant difference between the topographic maps I extracted from those coordinates and the location maps. Can you give me the bounds for all maps of the provinces of Pakistan you have made: Here, Here, and Here? Thanks. C1MM (talk) 02:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@C1MM: Hello. These maps have coordinates taken from Google Earth manually, maybe that's why they don't coincide with the real ones. --Milenioscuro (talk) 06:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was wondering if it would be possible to either extract new location maps using the coordinates listed on the location map modules (using the same datasource as you) or accurately determine the coordinates of the current locator maps (to like 2 or 3 decimal places). C1MM (talk) 18:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Answered

How to make maps

hello good afternoon I would like to ask how you create the maps like the maps of the new spain I would appreciate it very much pd:my english is very bad therefore i am using a translator Fernando Sshostakovich (talk) 22:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Turkestan ASSR (1921-1923).svg

Turkestan 109.187.65.115 04:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A well overdue barnstar

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	I have discovered your amazing map showing the maritime borders in the Caribbean. You well deserve this award for the quality of your map, as well as the huge amount of work that went into it. Mapeh (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake in Russian map

Hello,

On this map of yours (File:Expansión territorial de Rusia.svg), you incorrectly portrayed Kiev as falling under Russian rule in 1772. However, the Wikipedia article for Kiev says that it fell under Russian rule in 1667. In fact, some of the maps that you used as sources for your own map likewise show Kiev as falling under Russian rule in the late 1600s. Thus, I was wondering if you would be willing to fix this error on your map.

Have a good day and best regards,

Futurist110 (talk) 04:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, but your map (File:Expansión territorial de Rusia.svg) has mistake: territory that marked like 1772 was Russian in 1654 , and part of territory what marked like 1793 was Russian in 1772. Also you in dessignation modern borders gave to Latvia and Estonia the western part of Pskov Oblast and Leningrad Oblast. Thank you. NikitFillipov (talk) 14:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, but your map: File:Expansión territorial de Rusia.svg has mistake: territory that marked like 1772 was Russian in 1654 , and part of territory what marked like 1793 was Russian in 1772. Also you modern territory (western part of Pskov Oblast and Leningrad Oblast) gave to Latvia and Estonia. Correct this please Thank you.

Lo siento, pero su mapa: File:Expansión territorial de Rusia.svg se equivoca: el territorio que marcaba como 1772 era ruso en 1654, y parte del territorio que marcaba como 1793 era ruso en 1772. También usted el territorio moderno (la parte occidental del Óblast de Pskov y el Óblast de Leningrado) dio a Letonia y Estonia. Corrija esto por favor, gracias. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.221.116.240 (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done

Mapa del Magdalena Medio

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2803:2A80:F0:CB99:41F5:1DDB:F0BA:35C4 (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola! Resulta que aparece municipios principalmente de los Departamentos de Bolívar (Achí, San Jacinto del Cauca, Pinillos, Montecristo, Tiquisio, San Martin de Loba, Barranco de Loba, Altos del Rosario, Hatillo de Loba, San Fernando, Margarita, El Peñón) y Cesar (Chimichagua, Curumaní, Pailitas, Tamalameque, Pelaya, Rio de Oro, González), Además, del El Banco, Magdalena que no son parte del esta Subregión y tiene ese error en la siguiente imagen: [[2]]. Espero que con tiempo puedas editar la imagen pronto. Un saludo, --·User:Henblo 21:41, 09 Feb 2020 (UTC)  Not done

Historical World Maps

Guess I have mentioned that earlier: I had de:Benutzer:Antemister/Weltkarten, a project of creating a series of historical world maps. But it dropped off later , as the my counterparts lacks the time to continue. But over the last months I had t learn programming and developed a small tool similar to [3] that is based on that map series. Question: Would you have, in principle, interest in continuing this series, as a long-term project?--Antemister (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can you make dalian the correct size in "Japanese Empire (orthographic image)"?

dont remove it, but just make it the correct size, because its way bigger than it actually was. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14D:4489:13DF:7863:5C17:D63E:3821 (talk) 14:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and also, color azad hindi territory in India. 2804:14D:4489:13DF:7863:5C17:D63E:3821 14:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Milenioscuro (talk) 02:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russian empire map

Good day! I'd like to say smth:

1. Maps: map1, map2, map3, map4, map5, map6. I suggest to enlarge the area on this map in light green the zone of influence of Russia in Armenia (territory of Turkey) in accordance with the above maps and in this map too.

Thank you! Good luck and thank you for your work--NikolayLukas (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)  Not done[reply]

Request Somaliland

• 

  Map of the administrative regions of Somaliland.

• 

  Somaliland location map.

Article(s): en:Regions of Somaliland, Category:SVG locator maps of regions of Somaliland

Hi @Milenioscuro: , I saw your great work making Location maps and i would to like request you.

Could please draw Location maps of Somaliland with regional borders.

Like this! Many Thanks.-- --Siirski (talk) 17:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Siirski:  Done, you can find them here. --Milenioscuro (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Milenioscuro: , Thank you much for great work of location maps of Somaliland regions

Flag of Nicoya

Hello. In 2013 you uploaded File:Bandera de Nicoya.svg. The problem is that this is a fictional flag. It comes from this alternate history project. The real flag of Nicoya is a green and red bicolor. You can see it on the municipal website, in this photo in front of a church, and on Flags of the World. If I knew how to make vector images, I would upload a new version myself. (A new version of the file is appropriate here, correct? Since the current version is a fiction and appears on more than 30 Wikipedia pages.) But I feel like making a version of the correct file should be fairly simple, and it really should be replaced. Thanks, Fishal (talk) 22:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fishal: Entendido. Cuando creé la imagen la bandera que mostraban en FOTW era esa, pero veo que ya corrigieron, proceso a hacerlo mismo. --Milenioscuro (talk) 20:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, también miré esa bandera ficticia en una vieja versión de FOTW. Fishal (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Venezuelan provinces

Hello, it's me again

I was wondering, over on this wikipage there's your maps of the provinces of Venezuela over the years.

On the 1810 map there's a relatively big Barinas, reaching almost all the way to Barquisimeto. Cumaná is also doesn't reach the Orinoco Delta

On this map of Venezuela in 1810, you can see Barinas is smaller, and Cumaná is bigger. This map was made in ~1890 in Colombia, as part of the Geographical and Historical Atlas of the Republic of Colombia

Do you have an idea on why those maps differ?

FatMax1492 (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FatMax1492: hola, voy a responder en español porque es mi idioma natal y me es mas fácil expresar los cambios entre mapas en mi propio lenguaje.

El mapa en cuestión pertenece al Atlas Físico y Político de la República de Venezuela, pero este es un mapa general y contiene ciertos errores del autor. En 1810 (y desde antes) el delta del río Orinoco pertenecía a la provincia de Guayana como parte del cantón Piacoa. En ese mismo año la provincia de Barinas estaba compuesta por los actuales estados venezolanos de Barinas, Portuguesa y Apure, cuando se conformó la Gran Colombia (1819-1821) se segregó Apure para crear una provincia del mismo nombre. mas tarde en la década de 1850 se segregó Portuguesa y se creó la provincia homónima.

La evolución de los cambios territoriales de las provincias de Venezuela (ahora estados) se puede verificar en el artículo Provincias de Venezuela de la wikipedia en español.

Saludos.--Milenioscuro (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrijo lo dicho respecto a Barinas, buscando sobre la división política de la provincia de Caracas en 1811 encontré este archivo, que en su página 56 dice lo siguiente:

De todas las provincias que conformaban la antigua Capitanía General de Venezuela, y luego de la sanción de la Constitución Federal de diciembre de 1811, la más extensa, territorialmente hablando de todas Provincia de Venezuela, era la Provincia de Caracas que comprendía lo que en la actualidad es el territorio de de los Estados Miranda, Vargas, Aragua, Carabobo, Guárico, Yaracuy, Falcón, Lara, Portuguesa, Cojedes y Trujillo de la república de Venezuela; y que en la época estaba dividida en los Partidos capitulares o Municipalidades de Caracas, San Sebastián, Villa de Cura, Valencia, San Carlos, San Felipe, Barquisimeto, Guanare, Calabozo, Carora, Araure, Ospino, Tocuyo y Nirgua.

Esto significa que debo corregir el mapa de 1810. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: Hola, muchas gracias por su repuesta. Mi Español es malo, pero respondo en Español sin embargo.

¿Si lo entiendo bien, el mapa de 1810 con la provincia de Barinas pequeña es el correcto? FatMax1492 (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FatMax1492: yes... and no. Smaller Barinas is correct, but Guayana (Guiana) without Orinoco Delta not. I'm going to correct the Barinas Province in my own map. --Milenioscuro (talk) 16:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for clearing this up! FatMax1492 (talk) 20:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Venezuela in 1810 --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Somaliland districts location map with the regions

• 

  Map of the administrative districts of Somaliland.

• 

  Somaliland location map.

Article(s): Category:SVG locator maps of regions of Somaliland

Hi @Milenioscuro: , I tried many times to draw Somaliland districts location map with the regions, but it's difficult to me. could you help me please 🙏🏽.

Many Thanks. --Siirski (talk) 17:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Siirski:  Done, you can find them here. --Milenioscuro (talk) 04:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: , Many thanks 🙏🏽. --Siirski (talk) 12:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Thank you a lot for the great locator maps of Somaliland 🙏🏽. Siirski (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

escudo de bogotá

hola perdón por molestarte ,cuando vi el escudo del reino de la nueva granda (el de Bogotá mi ciudad natal) vi que había un error ,la águila que tiene más características alemanas que la original ,si pudiera poner la versión la que estaba — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan C2006 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

Mapa de la Ilha de Santo Aleixo

Holá, Milenioscuro. ¿Qué tal?

Soy edictor de Wikipédia y necesito de tu ayuda: ¿Podés actualizar los nombres del mapa de la Ilha de Santo Aleixo? (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ilha_do_Aleixo.png)

Actualmente, el mapa no presenta los nombres de las dos playas: Praia dos Pernambucanos (Este) y Praia da Holanda (Sur), más allá de Enseada Espanha e França (Abajo de la playa ubicada en el Sur).

¡Muchas gracias, amigo!

¡Saludos!

Lighterdim (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holá, Milenioscuro.

¿Alguna novedad?

Lighterdim (talk) 16:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lighterdim: La verdad, no me interesa hacer esto, si quiere puede pedirlo en Commons:Graphic Lab/Map workshop. --Milenioscuro (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Location maps conventions

Hello Milenioscuro! A long time ago you told me this on my talk page: "I must tell you that location maps have their own conventions, such as you can see here, here and here, so I must revert your changes. If you want to upload your versions in a separate file, you can do it." I still thank you for telling me this! But recently I've started to wonder if I'm definitely obligated to use the equirectangular projection in all of my maps. I usually make statistical maps, like those on HDI, GDP, diaspora populations and so on, and not location maps, so I don't know if the conventions are applied to them. The equirectangular projection is definitely not the projection I prefer and I would really like to change the projection used on File:2020 UN Human Development Report.svg and other maps. Could you tell me if you know if this would be allowed or even well-received by other users when most maps actually use equirectangular projections? − Allice Hunter ^(Inbox) 00:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Allice Hunter: Hello! For statistical maps there are no established conventions in Wikipedia, although most choose to use the Robinson projection in gray scales. I don't think there is a problem with you choosing one of your choice. --Milenioscuro (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 

  Equirectangular projection

• 

  Robinson projection

 Answered

Thank you for answering, forgive me for confusing Robinson and equirectangular projections. I'm actually a fan of Miller cylindrical projection for aesthetic preference reasons. I intend to use Miller for my new maps. − Allice Hunter ^(Inbox) 19:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Allice Hunter: Hi, here are some conventions for that type of map, but nowhere does it say that the Robinson projection is mandatory. --Milenioscuro (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request2

Hi can you please remove Siachen Glacier from Indian map because it is disputed between in India & Pakistan and controlled by both but user "Goran tek-en" added whole Siachen Glacier in Indian map without any discussion , I request u please remove it from Indian map. Ytpks896 (talk) 09:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytpks896:  Done, if user "Goran tek-en" reverts, talk to him, not me. Bye. --Milenioscuro (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytpks896: & @Milenioscuro: Siachen is not controlled by Pakistan, it's claimed so; but currently being controlled by India as Union Territory of Ladakh (Leh- (Ladakh) & Kargil District), do not attempt to change the status-quo futher.
Ksh.andronexus (talk) 07:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ksh.andronexus: ehmm... I don't care. I was only fulfilling a request. I will not touch that file again in my life. Good night. --Milenioscuro (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Turkestan (Kokand) Autonomy.svg

Hello. Please change the color. The blue color symbolized the belonging of the majority of the population of Turkestan to the Turks, red - renewal and revolution. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 05:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Зайцев Руслан Викторович: Why me? ask someone who has modified that file before. Bye and good luck. --Milenioscuro (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Walden69: Locked. @Zscout370: is silent Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

File:Turkestan Autonomous SSR Flag.gif

There is a flag and others are nonsense. Зайцев Руслан Викторович (talk) 15:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Bashkir ASSR.svg

Hello. Please correct as in the source File:Coat of Arms of Bashkir ASSR.png 37.122.57.133 19:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg

File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ eesti ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ română ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ shqip ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙

Wiradija (talk) 02:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo Episcopado de Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ eesti ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ română ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ shqip ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙

Wiradija (talk) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pasaré olímpicamente de esta tontería. --Milenioscuro (talk) 02:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo Diócesis de Tibú

Hola Milenioscuro, espero estés bien...

Quería que me ayudarás corrigiendo el error que hice en la actualización del escudo de la Diócesis de Tibú. --Sebas RS (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]