Welcome to the Commons, Dornicke!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی |
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

User talk:Dornicke/Archive

Parque Dom Pedro II

Oi Dornicke, your picture: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Parque_Dom_Pedro_II,_vista_do_centro_1.JPG – Is it really from 2009? Crazy, how this place changed the last years. Abraço Alo. --177.32.177.103 12:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is, but, in fact, it didn't change much. I just found a photogenic corner. Dornicke (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was there some days ago, but it looks more than a dump now. However, you know if there are still games? --177.32.177.103 11:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

Hi, greetings from Moscow. I see you uploaded this nice portrait File:Philip Maliavin- Retrato do Embaixador Smirnoff.JPG - Russian painter, Russian sitter, Museum in Brazil. We here in Russia are trying to find out who was the person, but thanks to Vodka brand, it is impossible to google. Maybe you still have catalog it is scanned from and there is sitter's full name or even the initials? Clearly in it 1926? no 1936 or 1916? (resolution is not well enough). Since when it is in your museum? Gift from USSR government, private, bought? Please, we are waiting for your answer. --Shakko (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much. As an anonymous gift it is more enigmatic... We can't conclude was it Soviet ambassador or former Emperor's. It can't be Russian in Brazil, as we hadn't diplomatic relations in these years yet, and Malyavin should be working in France at this time. Ah, and besides vodka, surname "Smirnov" is FIRST in list of most popular Russian surnames. It will be so nice to include this portrait in proper article. Thank you once again, we are waiting for news. --Shakko (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Arthur Timótheo da Costa - Marinha. 1919.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Timótheo da Costa - Marinha. 1919.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 02:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Done Dornicke (talk) 06:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Friedrich Hagedorn - Vista do Rio de Janeiro (ABI).jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Friedrich Hagedorn - Vista do Rio de Janeiro (ABI).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 02:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Dornicke (talk) 06:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour traje.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tour traje.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی 

--Tonyjeff (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you not to remove tags without proper discussion. It may be considered vandalism. Thanks. Tonyjeff (talk) 17:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Américo - Independência ou Morte, 1888.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pedro Américo - Independência ou Morte, 1888.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lecen (talk) 02:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Américo - Independência ou Morte (detalhe).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pedro Américo - Independência ou Morte (detalhe).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lecen (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour traje.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tour traje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teodoro Braga - Périplo Máximo de Antônio Raposo Tavares, 1928.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Teodoro Braga - Périplo Máximo de Antônio Raposo Tavares, 1928.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yanguas (talk) 23:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Johnson Heade - Floresta brasileira, 1864.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Martin Johnson Heade - Floresta brasileira, 1864.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rsberzerker (talk) 03:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Oscar Pereira da Silva - Aclamação de Amador Bueno.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oscar Pereira da Silva - Aclamação de Amador Bueno.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plein-air_landscape_paintings_from_Brazil

Category discussion warning

Category:Plein-air_landscape_paintings_from_Brazil has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Milartino (talk) 20:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Oscar Niemeyer (0,,20926942,00).jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體) 
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oscar Niemeyer (0,,20926942,00).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oscar Niemeyer (0,,20926942,00).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dantadd 19:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Auguste Leroux - Cena erótica.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Auguste Leroux - Cena erótica.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 04:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museu Histórico Municipal José Chiachiri.jpg

Oi Dornicke! Você licenciou a fotografia acima (carregada por você em 2011) com {{PD-Art}} e datou a fotografia com "c. 1913". Bom, ambas declarações são erradas. 1. {{PD-Art}} serve para licenciar (principalmente) "obras de arte" bidimensionais enquanto esta "fotografia" é tridimensional. 2. Em 1913 também não teve automóveis como esta escondida no cantinho à direta. A data da fotografia deve ser dos anos 1950 - 1970... Portanto: Você tem um outro licenciamento e uma outra data verificável a oferecer? Só sei que o museu abriu neste edifício em 1970. Como está necessita de permissão COM:OTRS. Gunnex (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 00:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings_by_production_area_by_country

Category discussion warning

Paintings by production area by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


moogsi (blah) 02:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marginal Pinheiros (CENU-Globo).jpg

Oi! A foto File:Marginal Pinheiros (CENU-Globo).jpg, carregada por você em 07.2008, é realmente sua? É que antes do upload foi publicada em 12 de maio de 2007 via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=13127748#post13127748 (por "brandi") = http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/2694/margcenugloborf2.jpg (última modificação: 05.2007). No mesmo dia a foto foi derivada por "Kauã" via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=13128361#post13128361 = http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/8500/margcenugloborf2xi7.jpg... Gunnex (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ver também (1 mês mais tarde) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=488371 (06.2007, por "Marcelo Victor") = http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x111/marcelo_victor/01.jpg

Mais alguns:

Gunnex (talk) 23:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Todas as fotos são de minha autoria e foram publicadas anteriormente no Trekearth. Eu as removi e as doei ao patrimônio público posteriormente, publicando-as no commons. E acho de muito mau tom sua acusação. Até porque o thread do Skyscrapercity não menciona os autores das fotos. Marcelo é apenas o criador do thread e basta olhar para o thread para perceber que ele utilizou fotos tiradas com máquinas diferentes, apenas compilou as imagens. Verifique as informações de processamento das imagens e verá que são incompatíveis. E, por favor, antes de sair por aí acusando outros, pesquise melhor. Ou, melhor ainda, mande uma mensagem para o autor do thread perguntando se as fotos são de fato dele, ou onde ele as conseguiu. Dornicke (talk) 22:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flickr.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flickr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Casa dos Povos da Floresta 01.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Casa dos Povos da Floresta 01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 10:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Loja Maçônica de Cachoeira 01.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Loja Maçônica de Cachoeira 01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 08:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasar Segall - CorreioPaulistano 04-11-1928.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lasar Segall - CorreioPaulistano 04-11-1928.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 10:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

file names

Hello. Please if you do not dislike it do not use the comma "," character in filenames when you upload a new file. I suggest to see Commons:File_naming#Language.2C_character_set_and_extension. Anyway thanks for your big contribution--Pierpao.lo (listening) 05:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gabriel Deluc - Retrato de Mussolini.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gabriel Deluc - Retrato de Mussolini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.30.111.81 22:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Dornicke! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anônimo - D. Pedro, Duque de Bragança.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Anônimo - D. Pedro, Duque de Bragança.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Centro de Museologia, Antropologia e Arqueologia.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Centro de Museologia, Antropologia e Arqueologia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:FAAP, vista áerea.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Auguste Moreau - Nu 2.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Auguste Moreau - Nu 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder(d) 23:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arqueologia do Mediterrâneo

Hi, at first thanks for uploading images of these artefacts, the most people never would see in their life. But - what should I do with a description as "Artefatos em vidro no acervo de arqueologia do Mediterrâneo"? Together with such an image? What do we see? Looks like glas, but maybe there are vessels made of clay or stone too. From where it is? When is it made? Roman? Greek? Cypriotic? Levantine? Egyptian? Minor asiatic? Sorry, but this image is unusable for anything without further informations. At least we need informations as here. I'm working to ancient greek pottery. So I would be so happy about images you made. But how I shoud use this or that. The first one clearly is underitalic red-figure, but I bet, there is more to know. Apulian? Campanian? Paestan? Sicilian? Lucanian? Made when? The secons probably too is from an underitalic workshop, on the other hand it is an amphora in the nolan style. I can't tell more about it only with the images. We need more informations and I bet there were more. And this for example is not an amulet - it is a votive. An amulet should prevent you against bad things. A votive is a gif for the gods, bidding for something or thanking for something. Here you are doing it again very well. But even here critic - this is greek art,made by grreks living in southern "Italy". This is not Gnathia style, this is red-figure. Maybe it's the easiest to try to do it with a checklist:

  • who made it (person)
  • who made it (culture)
  • when was it made
  • where was it made
  • where was ist found
  • which style
  • which shape
  • where it is today
  • a description

Such files would be so helpfull and they are desperatly needed. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. I'm trying to add as much information as I have available. Unfortunatelly, several of these pieces did not have signs with informations when I had the opportunity of photographing them. I've found some information on the catalogue of the museum where they're located and also on their website. It's my intention to research about them and expand the information with time. Feel free to add or correct information as well, any kind of help in identifying these pieces is welcome. Regards, Dornicke (talk) 01:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
These are Roman, found in Pompeii. All glasses. Dornicke (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I know this problem. Sadly Brazil did not partizipate in the CVA-project. I hope, you will find out more informations :). Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Idolo antropomorfo de Iguape (cropped).jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體) 
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Idolo antropomorfo de Iguape (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Idolo antropomorfo de Iguape (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gunnex (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Dear Dornicke,
 I have recently written a book called "A Journey to Faith" in which I follow the genealogy in the Bible from Abraham to Jesus.
 I would like to ask for permission to use the image of the the death of Judas Maccabaeus (File Image: José Teófilo de Jesus - A morte de Judas Macabeu.jpg) as I write about him in the period of Judean history prior to the time of Jesus when the Roman Empire took over the nation.
 I understand that the image has been placed in the public domain, but my publisher requires me to receive written permission to use any image (by email is fine). Could I ask you if you would be so kind as to mind sending me an email with your approval?
 The image will be credited to you in the book directly underneath the image.

I look forward to hearing from you soon - kind regards, Paul Brunton. PaulBrunton64 (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vão Livre do MASP - Esculturas de Abelardo da Hora 01.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vão Livre do MASP - Esculturas de Abelardo da Hora 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guillermo Laborde - En el taller.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Guillermo Laborde - En el taller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guillermo Laborde - Deporte.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Guillermo Laborde - Deporte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent (talk) 01:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:José Miguel Pallejá - Estudio.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:José Miguel Pallejá - Estudio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent (talk) 15:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pinacoteca_Municipal_de_São_Paulo

Category discussion warning

Pinacoteca Municipal de São Paulo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Almondega (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clap, clap, clap...

Impressionado com suas contribuições no Commons. Meia dúzia de contribuidores como ti e isso estaria bem diferente em termos de acervo sobre brasilidades. Cordialmente, Sturm (talk) 04:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acaso não conseguiria nos brindar com alguns quadros do nosso "ilustre" Bartolomeu?!?!?! Sturm (talk) 08:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado, Sturm :)! Conheço alguns bons quadros do Anhanguera, mas a maioria ainda não está em domínio público, incluindo o mais famoso, do Teodoro Braga, que mostra o bandeirante impressionando os índios fazendo fogo, que está no Museu do Ipiranga. Se me deparar com algum carregável por aqui, faço questão. Dornicke (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Recarreguei um lote de fotos sobre museus brasileiros, pois quando você o fez, creio que o uploader não era capaz de puxar os Metadados, agora devidamente embedados nos arquivos. Cordialmente, Sturm (talk) 04:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Pedro Weingärtner - Estação de ferro.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pedro Weingärtner - Estação de ferro.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Bjarlin (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's missing a U.S. licence, see Commons:Copyright tags#United States and Commons:Copyright tags#Non-U.S. works. The painter died in 1929, so the painting could be published 1923 or later. In that case, it has to be deleted on Commons because of not being in the Public Domain in the United States. Maybe it could be used locally on another wiki or on English Wikipedia under the conditions of fair use, but that's not possible on Commons. Regards --Bjarlin (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've used the wrong tag, so I've reverted you. This painting is from 1913 [1], so it's accepted in this project. Regards, Dornicke (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That was not the wrong tag, because there has been missing the date (it could have been from 1923 or after that), and there was missing a U.S. licence. Do you know any better tag for this, if there is missing a U.S. licence and it's not clear, if a file has been made before 1923? The tag said that "This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status", and that is exactly, what has been missing. If you knew that the painting is from 1913, then you shouldn't have written "unknown date" here. --Bjarlin (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And if the title of the painting is not "Estrada de ferro", why is that the name in the file description now? --Bjarlin (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It hadn't been corrected yet. Done now. I think researching is important before sending files to deletion. Regards. Dornicke (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find anything about it. Thanks for correcting. Regards --Bjarlin (talk) 01:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:E.E. Santos Dumont em 1934.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文 
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:E.E. Santos Dumont em 1934.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coleção Didática - Museu Nacional 03.jpg

Hi! Is the meteorite File:Coleção Didática - Museu Nacional 03.jpg a part of the Meteorito Bendego? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 15:30, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francisco de Zurbarán - Virgen niña dormida.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Francisco de Zurbarán - Virgen niña dormida.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tremendo (talk) 17:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.


File:Crianças Juventude Hitlerista - Pres. Bernardes, c. 1930.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Crianças Juventude Hitlerista - Pres. Bernardes, c. 1930.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی 

191.44.11.189 18:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

{{Creator:Pedro Weingärtner}}

Hi, Dornicke, there are images available of Pedro Weingärtner, I nocited you added this one to the template. imo a photo would be better. Let me know your thoughs. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lotje. I agree with you in replacing for a photo. That was the only portrait of him available at the time it was added. Dornicke (talk) 01:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Lotje (talk) 05:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

permission to use photo

Hello,

Canadian author Lillian Conti would like to include your photo, “File:Almeida Júnior - Batismo de Jesus, 1895.JPG” in her forthcoming book. We’d like to request your written permission via email to do so. Please send permission to me at dario.cusmano@mail.mcgill.ca indicating how you would like credit to be given for the photo.

With thanks and best wishes, Dario Cusmano. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.58.217.115 (talk) 01:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Greco - St. Francis (private collection).JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:El Greco - St. Francis (private collection).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sanandros (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
thanks for the uploads, i've been going through changing to artwork template i.e. [2]

please also check out Commons:Pattypan it's great - cheers Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the barnstar, Slowking4! And for telling me about Commons:Pattypan. You've been doing a very nice job too! :) Dornicke (talk) 06:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pancho Fierro - Tapada limeña-001.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pancho Fierro - Tapada limeña-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pierre Bonnard - Nu feminino.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pierre Bonnard - Nu feminino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 03:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salvar em Salvador...

Olá, Dornicke. Estava a conferir como andava um 'antigo' ficheiro que carreguei (File:Parreiras O Primeiro Passo para a Independência da Bahia.png) e estranhei que estava a ser usado em várias wikis num artigo sobre "Cerco de Salvador", que retrata o final das lutas que culminaram no 2 de julho de 1823; quando conferi as categorias, lá estava a Paintings of Salvador, Bahia que, pelo histórico, foi adicionada por ti.

Embora uma das cópias do quadro esteja realmente na capital, a pintura retrata episódio ocorrido no dia 25 de junho de 1822 na Vila de Cachoeira, quando em seguida houve o cerco dessa cidade e o início das lutas que levaram ao tal "cerco de Salvador", no ano seguinte... A pintura que melhor retrata o cerco é a de Presciliano Silva, que usamos na pt-wiki e não está em domínio público...

De qualquer forma, Salvador não está ali retratada, e sim Cachoeira, pelo que penso ser a categoria inadequada. Deixo, então, ao vosso crivo. Um abraço, André Koehne TALK TO ME 19:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eita... descobri a seguir que existe uma fração da obra do Prisciliano Silva que citei como tendo carregado na pt-wiki e que está aqui mesmo no Commons; a licença diz que a reprodução se dá porque, segundo a lei 9.610 de 1998, art. 115, obras encomendadas pelo governo antes de 1983 são de domínio público. Acessei a lei, o art. 115 trata da revogação e repristinação de outras leis, não da liberação de quadros. O art. 46, em seu inciso VI, contudo, libera a reprodução de trechos de obras de artes plásticas nas condições que especifica, e talvez a licença deveria ser corrigida - já que ali está uma parte do quadro, e não ele todo... Não sei se esta é sua "praia" por aqui, mas como fala inglês, talvez eu tenha vindo ao lugar certo... Abraço. André Koehne TALK TO ME 03:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Olá, Koehne, grato pela correção. Alterei a categoria para "Bahia in art". Abraço. Dornicke (talk) 03:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Museu Nacional

Hello,

Thank you so much for uploading this picture [3].

As this piece might have been destroyed during the recent fire in Rio, there is a debate about it. Several media present it as the throne of Adandozan while your caption describes it as a copy of Kpenga's throne. I think you are right, but I can't find any other reference. Do you know one ?

Regards,

Ji-Elle (talk) 10:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ji-Elle. This is a late 18th or early 19th century copy of Kpenga's throne, donated to King John VI of Portugal by Adandozan. I've found this discription in the sign explaining the artwork during my visit to the museum. Found some references, but only in Portuguese like this one from the museum's website. Dornicke (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your quick answer. If you find more about it, even in Portuguese, I remain interested. We are all very sorry about this tragedy. Ji-Elle (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am here to express thanks to Dornicke for his/her work taking pictures of the exhibitions in the National Museum of Brazil. You did a great work and the descriptions are very detailed. emijrp (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Emijrp. I'd never imagine these pictures would be so important due to a tragedy like this. It's a very sad loss for all of us. Dornicke (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am using them in en:Collection of funerary steles in the National Museum of Brazil and en:Collection of meteorites in the National Museum of Brazil. I hope similar pages for other collections are created. emijrp (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good to hear that. I'll try to create some other pages regarding the collections. Dornicke (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
One more en:Collection of Mediterranean antiquities in the National Museum of Brazil. emijrp (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Upload de imagens em melhor resolução

Olá Dornicke, conforme iniciamos conversa na Wikipedia, estamos desenvolvendo parcerias GLAM com vários museus no Rio. Temos versões em alta definição de varias das imagens que você submeteu aqui. Como nas parcerias GLAM inserimos algumas predefinições com marcações da parceria, categorização e etc, gostaria de ver contigo a melhor forma de enviar as fotos do commons sem gerar qualquer problema ou alteração inapropriada em material carregado por outros.

O que sugere que façamos? Carregamos novas imagens com as devidas marcações e eliminamos futuramente as que já estão aqui ou carregamos novas versões por cima dos arquivos que você ja carregou adicionando as novas categorias e marcações?

Tenho acesso a um volume muito grande de material, que vai exigir uso de ferramentas automatizadas. São dezenas de milhares de imagens, contemplanto muitas das que você já carregou aqui de vários museus.

Rodrigo Padula (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Olá, Rodrigo Padula. Se as imagens forem exatamente da mesma obra, mas com melhor qualidade e resolução, não vejo nenhum problema em sobrescrever os meus envios. É uma iniciativa muito bem vinda. Dornicke (talk) 04:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No caso, como os arquivos são de fontes distintas, vi que recomendam enviar como novos arquivos, daí tenho outra questão que é a aplicação das imagens em melhor resolução na Wikipedia. Sofri com algumas reversões. Então não quero sair por aí substituindo imagens ruins por imagens boas e ser acusado de promoção de conteúdo ou algo do tipo. Estamos com várias imagens do Museu Antonio Parreiras por exemplo, pois assinamos parceria com a superintendência de museus do Rio de Janeiro que abrange vários museus do Rio. Se puder me dar algumas ideías e seu ponto de vista, não quero sair fazendo isso de forma arbitrária Rodrigo Padula (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cityscape_paintings_from_Brazil

Category discussion warning

Cityscape paintings from Brazil has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 11:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Resurrection_of_Christ_by_Raffaello_Sanzio

Category discussion warning

Resurrection of Christ by Raffaello Sanzio has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2804:14D:32A0:88B8:70FB:6432:C3A5:ABFC 18:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda Category:Eliseu Visconti

Olá Dornicke. Estamos planejando carregar o acervo de 1200 fotos de obras do pintor Eliseu Visconti. Solicito a sua ajuda no sentido de revisar a estrutura (árvore) de categorias do artista, assim como rever/estabelecer uma das imagens como padrão para carregamento das demais. Agradeço antecipadamente pela ajuda. Boas edições --HTPF (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Museu de Arte de São Paulo

Olá Dornicke, veja também aqui. saudação Trzęsacz (talk) 23:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

St Justine or St Catherine

About this file do you remember why you wrote St Justina? Thanks a lot. Regards--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Erro em nome da imagem

Olá, Dornicke.

Encontrei uma imagem numa leitura e, ao verificar a categoria do sujeito aqui me deparei com este quadro do Pedro Américo, onde você dá como sendo de Fagundes Varela; ocorre que a mesma retrata o escultor pt:Almeida Reis (e como tal está aqui categorizada); não seria o caso de pedir a renomeação?

Um abraço, André Koehne TALK TO ME 12:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, André Koehne (talk · contribs). A historiografia tradicional considera como um retrato de Almeida Reis, mas no catálogo mais recente que tenho do MNBA, esse retrato consta como sendo de Fagundes Varela. Essa também é a atribuição dada pelo Google Arts and Culture. Não vejo problema em renomear, acho apenas importante constar a informação sobre outra possível atribuição na descrição do arquivo. Dornicke (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, GMGtalk 19:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuelarosas.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Manuelarosas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ezarateesteban 16:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edgar Degas - Amarillo y Rosa.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Edgar Degas - Amarillo y Rosa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

StellarHalo (talk) 01:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Henri Pellegrini - Vista de Buenos Aires.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Charles Henri Pellegrini - Vista de Buenos Aires.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Scann (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frans Post - Paisagem da Paraíba (Engenho com rio).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Frans Post - Paisagem da Paraíba (Engenho com rio).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pirate-Prototype (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heaton e Rensburg - D. Pedro II.jpg

Hello Dornicke, wondering if you could take a look at the history of this file. You added Category:Heaton e Rensburg which I linked to Q59644043 created at the time by Myxomatosis0 but I am not sure if this is the correct way to do this, I guess. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]