Hosta

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haji Lane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Fixed. Malays (ethnic group). SlightSmile 13:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Slightsmile|<font color="navy">Slight</font>]][[User talk:Slightsmile|<font color="teal">''Smile''</font>]] : SlightSmile

to

[[User:Slightsmile|<span style="color: navy;">Slight</span>]][[User talk:Slightsmile|<i style="color: teal;">Smile</i>]] : SlightSmile

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Test edit old syntax. SlightSmile 20:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Test signature with new syntax. SlightSmile 20:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, do not agree. Most people in the western english world are beholden to social media - social media creates a false view of the world on almost everything. Perth Australia, along with other absurdities - denies accurate geographic knowledge. For a start the argument that created 'perth' as the prime location without qualifier was infested with those editors who dont like qualifiers. I was fortunate to have a relative who had lived in Ontario a very very long time ago, who never stated the name of a place without qualifying where - on the basis that there were more places with ambiguity than, no as many as, the late frank zappa alluded to when utilising the place names for his dislike of urban us culture all those decades ago... (how many springfields in the us say?). I think that place and country is wrong. For some very good reasons. Some mostly former editors of wikipedia thought that google hits was enough to determine primacy. I say may they live in Ontario and try living amongst the place names that require qualification as a matter of life or death perhaps. I like qualifiers, for a whole range of reasons. Please never assume that there is a collective geographical 'good sense' amongst fellow wikipedians. Tasmania has been designated as a separate country by wise editors. I rest my case. Thanks for your comments. I beg to disagree. JarrahTree 01:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Though it may seem to you to be a discussion that might not have many ramifications - wrong. The things that we touch on are things like various carnivores (not elephants) in the room. People used to get beaten around the head and other parts of the anatomy over primacy - i find the effort and angst created by having primacy in articles or items to be quite anti-encyclopediac - the general resolution over that could have to be abandon things tied into the google algorithm - google hits are neither a template or standard that wp en articles or subjects should be tied into imho - there are subjects and topics that do not show up on the omnivorous algorthym of whatever guiles or guides it. So why respond on this? Binary names - place and location (within a narrower context for the qualifer, and not country but something more specific) - are endless issues that we as a community should have resolved years ago, but due to the nature of the place... Pity youre elsewhere, this is a long beer or three, or tea, coffee, whatever - that should have been resolved at a wikimania, or something similar. Bet youre a canuck - go geulph! (the relative was enrolled in U of T long before you or I were even on the twinkle of an eye). sigh JarrahTree 03:53, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Capture of Broadway article reverted to before Clear added.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Capture of Broadway article reverted to before Clear added.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)