How Can We Help?
You are here:
< Back
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio 13:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Condra

Julie Condra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable actress, even the only mentions of her are in relation to her husband and notability is not inherited. Her career doesn't apepar to have ever taken off and she has primarily only ever held minor roles in the 80s and 90s. I'm not sure what the Young Artist Award is but I can't find a source for it anyway. Praxidicae (talk) 18:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For someone to think Julia Condra is non-notable must be either born in the late 90's or 2000. Is like saying Kimberly Hart ( Amy Jo Johnson ) the first Pink Power rangers is non-notable.

Julie Condra had appeared Circus of the Stars which was an annual television special, broadcast by the CBS network which featured many leading movie and television stars. You need some level of fame to be there as you can see the list is all filmed with superstars, famous or above average level actors/actress. Julie Condra would be a above level fame or even famous actress

Julie Condra have been in the 11th Youth in Film Awards which was nominated for Best Young Actress in a Daytime Drama for her work Santa Barbara.

Julie Condra role as Madeline Adams Wonder years still have views as high as 150,000 132,000, 390,000, 420,000, In English, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=madeline+adams+wonder+years

It's so weird to me that someone would say she is a non-notable actress. My only guess you have to be born in the late 90s and 2000's. I was born in early 80's and those from 70's, 60's, 50's would surely know her ( not necessarily true for many ) if you remember her role as Madeline Adams, her videos still have 100,000 to 420,000 views and with even videos of her translated even in Spanish, Korean, Portuguese. Her role as Madeline Adams from the Wonder years was remembered by many young people, teens, young adults for mainly being the new hot girl in high school that fell madly in love with Kevin (and we were envious of Kevin ). You only need to look at the Youtube comments how all the boys fantasize her role. As Madeline Role, her older age, maturity, but with this beautiful angelic, innocent cute face that made every kid, teen and young guy fell in love. I would say she was most famous around 1990 to 1992, she kind of started to become less popular after her marriage with Brandon Douglas ( who isn't famous but recognizable, somewhat famous perhaps) who were some girls dream boy. True that she fell into Irrelevance after the year 2000, I have not heard from her after 1998, and her last movie I watched was Crying man. You would only later see her with 1 or 2 episode of here and there although with plenty of time on screen involving her story. Saying she is non-notable is like saying Kimberly Hart, the first American female pink power rangers is a non-notable actress, she kind of fell into irrelevancy after her first power ranger series 1993-1995, after she left power rangers I don't even know where she went to. Is she a non-notable actress just because people born in 90's and 2000's who never enjoyed the first Power rangers. I personally also don't know these new Power ranger actress. For many people before 90's, 2000's generation we would know people like Julie Condra and Kimberly Hart better than these new 2000's Disney actress or Games of Thrones actress. Even if they are not as popular as today they are still our childhood from the early 90's. Shadohaw (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. I'm finding surprisingly little on her, because I recall (I'm an old guy) significant print coverage on her around the time of Eerie, Indiana, where she had a major role. But all I can find now is mostly listings of her name as a cast member in her various series, and a coverage of her Young Artist Award nomination in an undetermined 1990 issue of The Hollywood Reporter. No !vote from me at this time. TJRC (talk) 17:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. For someone to think Julia Condra is non-notable must be either born in the late 90's or 2000 It seems to me she only seems notable to some born in the 80s who grew up with the Wonder Years. --John B123 (talk) 16:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The passionate advocacy above notwithstanding, I don't see any evidence the subject meets the GNG, and she certainly doesn't make WP:NACTOR, never having had a starring role in a significant film or show. None of the sources in the article pass muster: they're either unreliable (Facebook, social media, blogs) or namedrops/casual mentions. As far as her purportedly seminal role in The Wonder Years, she appeared in only four out of 115 eps, and 31 other actors appeared in more over the course of the series. That the actress is part of User:Shadohaw's childhood I wouldn't argue against, but being part of an editor's childhood isn't in any Wikipedia notability criteria. Ravenswing 12:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Ravenswing. Despite the article creator's claims, there is no evidence to suggest that the role on The Wonder Years helps satisfy any of the criteria given at WP:NACTOR, and there isn't enough coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. The WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS portion of the article creator's argument is irrelevant. --Kinu t/c 05:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I totally agree with the other delete voters. The article fails WP:NACTOR since she was never in a significant role and also WP:GNG because there's no in-depth reliable sources about her. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Categories
Table of Contents