Hosta

by | Mar 16, 2018 | Hosta

How Can We Help?
You are here:
< Back

A question ?

You might find this interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Takbir#A_question_?

A comparison of Wikipedia and AI.

I believe there are elements of Wikipedia being turned into Islamipedia.

I know conservative and respectful editors - are being bullied - who are giving up editing Wikipedia.

I would appreciate your response.

Kelator (talk) 23:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelator what is Islamipedia? EvergreenFir (talk) 23:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- many Islamic sections of Wikipedia extolling ﺣَﻘِﻴﻘَﺔ [the truth]
Kelator (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelator It sounds like you are saying there is a conspiracy to promote Islam on Wikipedia... beyond the typical state actors that is. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.
And there by degrading Wikipedia.
For instance, Usage by extremists and terrorists of 'Allah Akbar', portrayed as a cinematic trope. Check out almost every Wikipedia article on the Quran - they sanitize or avoid the contentious elements.

Kelator (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelator are you here to build an encyclopedia or you're here to prevent "Islamipedia"? EvergreenFir (talk) 17:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On building encyclopedias
Go to Quran 2:230
Using RSs, write a Wikipedia section on it within https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Baqara
If you are a new editor prepare to get banned
The question is, are you here to build an honest encyclopedia, or here to bow to Islamic sensitivities ?
Compare wordings from any AI
I suggest not linking all this to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia
Kelator (talk)
@Kelator: I don't understand what you're saying. That new users get banned for editing on that one page? Because from the edit history, it's all one user with different accounts. Speaking of which, do you have a previous account? EvergreenFir (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you can not understand what I am saying, then it is no wonder, Wikipedia's active-editor numbers are declining.
Kelator (talk) 09:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You present your case with all the clarity of mud, Kelator. I can't parse what argument you're trying to make. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pretty Cure on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Linehan

Heya, hope you're well. I've just noticed that you protected the Graham Linehan page for three months. Is there any way I could convince you to stretch it to an indef, or at least longer?
The page has undergone a pattern of "protected for a year/6 months, immediately the same behaviour starts after the protection ends, page is protected again", repeated again and again for about five years. It's almost definitely not going to end any time soon, and because of the subject's anti-trans views I think there's a case for an indefinite semi-protection under GENSEX at this point. No worries if not, just said I'd ask to try protect the article from having the same happen again. Thanks, — ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser! Let me take another look with GENSEX in mind. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ser! Good suggestion. It's clear that after 4 years of re-upping the protections the problem has not ceased. I've indef protected it. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic, many thanks! ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Categories
Table of Contents