Hosta

by | Mar 16, 2018 | Hosta

How Can We Help?
You are here:
< Back

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I added references to the document. Let me know if this meets the standards. Canadachoral (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Canadachoral! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Canadachoral/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Canadachoral/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jean-Sébastien Vallée, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 09:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean-Sébastien Vallée (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No evidence of significant, independent coverage in reliable sources. Every source cited is a website of an organization that Vallée is linked to. We need evidence that independent sources have noticed Vallée and chosen to write about him.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jean-Sébastien Vallée has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jean-Sébastien Vallée. Thanks! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean-Sébastien Vallée (June 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheTechie was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: With no improvement and ignorance of other reviewers' comments, I'm rejecting this.
thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was mentioned in other comments that the subject was notorious enough. Vallee is the leading choral conductor in Canada - there's not reason to deny an article on him and his work. The sources have been modified since the first version to include more secondary sources. I would like some more guidance if possible. Canadachoral (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Categories
Table of Contents