Hosta

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Turkey High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

• Elections in Turkey → Politics of Turkey - This article is a stub and the information this article supposed to provide is elsewhere avalible. -- Cat ^chi? 08:07, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

add: * Support or * Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and a signature:~~~~

• Oppose. Until you explain what you want done in more detail Philip Baird Shearer 15:32, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. The purpose of RM is simply to move a page to a new name, not to delete pages. Jonathunder 18:49, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)
• Oppose Merge them, or post a merge/duplication notice. Alai 05:35, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

---Add any additional comments on the "Requested move" below this line ---

• Totally confused Both of these articles have comment -- what are you proposing happens to the content of the latter? Merged? Deleted? Either way, this request would seem to be in the wrong place. Alai 02:20, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Also confused. Please explain what you want to do in more detail or I will remain opposed. Philip Baird Shearer 15:32, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The fact is elections in turkey does not need to be an extra topic, all necesary information is avalible at the remote topic. All information here thats not there shold me merged. -- Cat ^chi? 17:05, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This should should therefore be on Wikipedia:Duplicate articles. violet/riga (t) 18:40, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Done. -- Cat ^chi? 03:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Politics of Turkey is part of a series Politics by country. Elections in Turkey was part of a series Elections by country. I will restore the old pages, but will try to make a more clear separation. Gangulf 19:19, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

...by mitigated proportional representation with a barrier of 10 %

I have no clue what this means. Can anyone explain? As well, exactly what electoral system does Turkey use? Proportional representation is too broad a category. --Bash 07:45, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It would appear that it means that each party gets the same percentage of seats in parliament as its percentage of the vote, but there are two "mitigating" factors--

 --the 10% barrier.  If a party gets less than 10% of the vote, it gets no seats.  The parties with 10% or more share the seats proportionally.
 --Independants.  A candidate who registers as an independant, rather than part of a party list, gets a seat if he gets 10% of the votes in his province.

The independants had minimal effect in the election for the current parliament--they got only 9 seats, less than 2%.

The barrier had a huge, and presumably unindtended effect. The Islamist party got only 34% of the votes, but a little under 2/3 of the seats, because the vote was fragmented, and only one other party exceeded 10%.

The Islamist majority has attempted to elect an Islamist president, which has provoked a major constitutional crisis. There was talk until yeserday of the Army stepping in once again.

A fresh election has been scheduled, and it will be interesting to see if new election rules, different strategies by the parties, or different choices by the votes restore majority rule, of if a quirk in the election law preserves Islamist minority rule.

I know this will be deleted quickly as it will be viewed as discussion, but I hope a properly qualified person will be stimulated to add to the article, and better explain mitigated proportional representation.

Is this first sentence really necessary? --Goog 22:11, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)

My original edit to this page included a shorter version of the 2002 election results - that is to say, only the parties that won more than five percent of the national vote. A link was included to the main article, which contains the full results. My edit was reverted in part by user Electionworld, who put back in the full results. I personally feel a brief summary is better for this page, but don't want to revert Electionworld's changes unilaterally. What do others think? - Mikedaventry 23.02, Sep 26, 2006 (UTC)

At the moment all 'latest' election results except for the last months are in templates. The main reason for that is to have identical results througout Wikipedia. It wouldn't be good that the specific election page says that a party has x seats and another page says a party has x+1 seat. This makes the election coverage consistent. It has an disadvantage, the results can be very comprehensive. We could delete the parties with less than e.g. 1 % of the vote from the template and add the smaller parties in a separate table in the main article. Personally I don't mind the more comprehensive table. So for reasons of consistency, I would object not to have the template, but I am open for alterations in the template. Electionworld Talk? 07:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grand National Assembly of Turkeysays

"Election of its 550 members, who serve five-year terms, is by D'Hondt method, a party-list proportional representation system."

while this article doesn't mention that all? What is going on? Thanks,Evilbu 00:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The results of 2007 elections has been given. But there is no mention of percentage of votes in other elections. The number of seats does not reflect the popular politic trends. For example in 1950, CHP received % 39 of votes but the number of CHP seats was not more than % 15. In 1987 elections ANAP received % 36 of votes , but won % 65 of seats. So tables should be added to this article showing percentage of votes. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there is an election in Turkey this year ?

If their legislature elected in June 2011 has a four year term, doesn't that imply an election this year ?

Perhaps it is time for someone to create one.Lathamibird (talk) 05:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons should be obvious, both articles talk about the same thing, only one is a proper article, and the other is just a list of SOME of the elections. Openlydialectic (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 08:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]