This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DannyH (WMF) (talk · contribs)

More WMF-staff uploaded screenshots which do not attribute the authors of the screenshotted material. In this case, it's mostly MediaWiki and the volunteer-created Crosswatch tool, although there are files with other problems. Compare Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jkatz (WMF), Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KHammerstein (WMF), Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Npangarkar (WMF).

BethNaught (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing these out. I made corrections on all of the files except for the first four listed, adding that they are screenshots, and using the Wikimedia-screenshot template. I think that makes us all square on those, but please let me know if there's something else that I need to do to ensure compliance. The first four files listed -- (Rev slider wikihistory example, internet archive example, and wordpress one and two) -- are not Wikimedia screenshots, and you can delete them if you want to. -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 23:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at each file you changed:
The lesson is you can't just put {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} on the page. You actually need to identify the source, the authors and the license of the screenshotted material and name them. BethNaught (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would you like to take the Delete tag off of the files that are okay? -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding File:Wikistats camel milk.jpg: I agree that the current tags may be inaccurate, but I don't think this chart is a copyrightable work in the first place. The bars are automatically generated by a computer program (from data provided by WMF), and I doubt that their extremely simplistic design surpasses COM:TO. Seems like a case for {{PD-ineligible}}. In any case, many such charts from the same site have been uploaded by other (non-WMF staff) community members, so it would be a wider problem if these turned out to be incompatible with COM:Licensing (which I doubt). Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 23:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above mentioned DRs, which all leaded to keep. --Jcb (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]