Files uploaded by DannyH (WMF) (talk · contribs)
More WMF-staff uploaded screenshots which do not attribute the authors of the screenshotted material. In this case, it's mostly MediaWiki and the volunteer-created Crosswatch tool, although there are files with other problems. Compare Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jkatz (WMF), Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KHammerstein (WMF), Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Npangarkar (WMF).
- File:Rev slider wikihistory example.jpg
- File:Rev slider internet archive example.jpg
- File:Revision slider wordpress two revs.jpg
- File:Revision slider wordpress one rev.jpg
- File:Cross-wiki watchlist example 1.jpg
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 2.jpg
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 3.jpg
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 1.jpg
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 4.jpg
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 6.jpg
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 5.jpg
- File:Regular watchlist 1.jpg
- File:Regular watchlist 2.jpg
- File:Logging interface for dead links bots.jpg
- File:Wikistats camel milk.jpg
- File:Diff compare example 1b.jpg
- File:Diff compare example 1.jpg
BethNaught (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing these out. I made corrections on all of the files except for the first four listed, adding that they are screenshots, and using the Wikimedia-screenshot template. I think that makes us all square on those, but please let me know if there's something else that I need to do to ensure compliance. The first four files listed -- (Rev slider wikihistory example, internet archive example, and wordpress one and two) -- are not Wikimedia screenshots, and you can delete them if you want to. -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 23:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at each file you changed:
- File:Cross-wiki watchlist example 1.jpg - OK
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 2.jpg - incorrect tagging. Crosswatch uses the w:ISC license, not CC-BY-SA, GFDL or GPL, and User:Sitic (any other authors?) is not attributed.
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 3.jpg - ditto
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 1.jpg - ditto
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 4.jpg - ditto
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 6.jpg - ditto
- File:Crosswatch screenshot 5.jpg - ditto
- File:Regular watchlist 1.jpg - good
- File:Regular watchlist 2.jpg - ditto
- File:Logging interface for dead links bots.jpg - written by WMF so this looks good
- File:Wikistats camel milk.jpg - problematic: was it written by a WMF staffer at work? If not, the tag is inaccurate since an external website is not a WMF project. Needs to name whoever wrote stats.grok.se
- File:Diff compare example 1b.jpg - insufficient, article screenshotted is not named, so there is no way to attribute its authors
- File:Diff compare example 1.jpg - ditto
- The lesson is you can't just put {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} on the page. You actually need to identify the source, the authors and the license of the screenshotted material and name them. BethNaught (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Would you like to take the Delete tag off of the files that are okay? -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Regarding File:Wikistats camel milk.jpg: I agree that the current tags may be inaccurate, but I don't think this chart is a copyrightable work in the first place. The bars are automatically generated by a computer program (from data provided by WMF), and I doubt that their extremely simplistic design surpasses COM:TO. Seems like a case for {{PD-ineligible}}. In any case, many such charts from the same site have been uploaded by other (non-WMF staff) community members, so it would be a wider problem if these turned out to be incompatible with COM:Licensing (which I doubt). Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 23:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at each file you changed:
Kept: per above mentioned DRs, which all leaded to keep. --Jcb (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Recent Comments