Hosta

looks like a TV screenshot 78.55.248.54 07:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete it does indeed.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete: I agree it is a screenshot of the TV. Jappalang (talk) 10:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete One can tell it's photographed from a TV screen. Hekerui (talk) 10:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Well, if you consider shooting a detail from a TV screen (lasting 1/50th of a second) less appropriate, than scanning a detail from a Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa, owned by the Louvre

  

  , and, obviously scanned from a book, that is more recent then 70 years,then go on...

Or, Prosfilaes, if he thinks the File:Sibirskai Surikov.jpg is scanned from a book that is older than 70 years, let him throw the stone and hide the hand...

Thank all of you, who have payed attention to my insignificant photo!

Edal (talk) 22:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons policy there is a difference between "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art" and you making a screenshot of a copyrighted broadcast. Hekerui (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, clear case; derivative work with false license. You do not become the copyright holder of someone else's work by grabbing a frame of it off tv. Infrogmation (talk) 01:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]