This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amanda Hot.png

Very poorly edited version of File:Pole dancer 02.jpg (person removed). Unused. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Then edit this derivative, instead of deleting it. File is in scope. Tm (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not worth anyone's time to fix this. We have the original version. We don't need to keep junk just because it is in scope. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment But is worth the same time to delete it? Curious and funny, to open an DR to try to delete an file in scope. Tm (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that person has been replaced by a smudge. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]