Hosta

Shortcut: COM:AN

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Pou%C5%BE%C3%ADv%C3%A1n%C3%AD_obsahu_mimo_projekty_Wikimedia#

článek 2 Jak dodržet licence 3. odstavec 2. věta " Ani Wikimedia Foundation, ani tvůrci obsahu na stránkách Wikipedie poskytovat právní rady." - větě chybí sloveso

2.1 Public domain 3. odstavec 3.(poslední) "Pokud označíte obrázek jeho původem (odkud jej máte a jaký je jeho původ) a jménem tvůrce, může nám to pomociv případě pozdějšího sporu s vydavatelem." chybějící mezera pomociv -> pomoci v

Hello, On behalf of the Wikimedia Italy committee for the travel grant "Alessio Guidetti" I am sending a mass message on different it-N platforms and also to it-N users on "meta" level platforms. I've asked here for some help hoping to proceed directly from the meta level but I got no answer so I have started to ask locally.

I have prepared the target lists in m:User:Alexmar983/MassMessageList, where you can check the quarry sources too. In that meta page you can find the list for commons and the message. We've tested the second list on wikidata, it should be ok. I am online for the next 60 minutes if there are issues. Thanks in advance.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

anyone?--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have prepared a local list User:Alexmar983/MassMessageList/commons. From wikidata, I know the message can remain on meta, but the list has to be local.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok I do i manually tomorrow if noone is available. Ping me if otherwise. Bye.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done No objections. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

great, thanks. --Alexmar983 (talk) 12:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The files listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Raj.sukane seem to me gay contact advertisements with phone number. Is this reason for immediate deletion and if so, can an admin delete them? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I closed the request and deleted all his uploads speedily. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Larraizi has previously uploaded many pictures that do not have the correct source. I have gone through and tried to find the source for all of these, and while it is annoying, it isn't the reason for this complaint.

On one of the images that does not have a source, File:124 Gure Bizitza Elkartea hitzaldia - Gure Bizitza Elkartea conferencia.jpg, Larraizi attempted to make it look like User:FlickreviewR reviewed the file. Not only is this not the right way to review files, but Larraizi isn't even a license review and FlickreviewR is also blocked. I have posted a warning on the user's talk page, but I am not sure if there is anything else that should be done. Elisfkc (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think your warning was good. It may be that they don't understand that it looks like they were impersonating FlickreviewR. Storkk (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Storkk: ok, thanks. Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I gave them a last warning. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 01:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dravecky, much more active at en:wp than here, has recently died ([1], [2]). Do we have a procedure for dealing with deceased users? I'm unaware of anything here that's comparable to en:Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines. Nyttend (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

blanked his userpage and put a warning in the talk page that he died on 23 April. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our handling of deceased users is horrible compared to Wikipedia. Why do we wish to blank the userpage of someone who should be remembered? Why would we protect the user talk page of a deceased user when it is common to leave condolences? Why should a deceased user be blocked, has the account been compromised? Clearly we need a guideline on this, our actions do not do justice. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this topic should be linked at the village pump.IMHO some meta policy would be even better, I understand platforms need independence, but that's just a source of confusion, if we had some default meta guideline on this issue would be better--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we should never full-protect user talk pages (except temporarily because of excessive vandalism etc). Not of a deceased user, not of an indefblocked/banned, never ever. Otherwise, performing a deletion request (if necessary) may be interfered. I'm going to change the protection level to autoconfirmed-only. Thanks --A.Savin 13:36, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no further comment in three weeks on Commons:Requests for comment/User categories, can an uninvolved admin or experienced user close? Cheers. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should close that RFC now. None of the proposals/options have consensus. Maybe give it one more month? ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]