Hairy Woodpecker

現在の候補へスキップ 現在の除外候補へスキップ

ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。

まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。

ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。

• 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル（1.92メガピクセル）は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。

コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なＰＣモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。

• スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。

• フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。

• 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか（例：後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等）を確認しましょう。

• 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。

• デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング（切り取り）等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。

• 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
  • たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
  • 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
  • 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。

技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。

• 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード（露光寛容度）と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合（部分）もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。

• 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ２本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも３分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する４つの交点の内どれか１つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。

• 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。　なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング（流し撮り）」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。

• 被写界深度（DOF）とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角（短焦点）レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠（長焦点）レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。

グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。

• 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。

• ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。

• 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。

• テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。

• 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。

• バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。

• 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。

主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。

• 『象徴性か妥当性か』　ー　『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。

画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。

画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。

推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。

ステップ１：画像名（接頭Image:を含む）を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー＆ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。

ステップ２：ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。

ステップ３：ステップ２で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。し、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}

投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します：

• {{支持}}または{{Support}} （ Support、 Support),
• {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} （ Oppose、 Oppose),
• {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
• {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
• 情報：{{Info}} ( Info),
• 質問：{{Question}} ( Question).

テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます（可能ならば英語で）。

あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名（~~~~）も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。

時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}}  Keep 及び {{維持}}  Keep （＝『秀逸な画像』に値する）、または{{Delist}}  Delist 及び {{除外}}  Oppose （＝『秀逸な画像』に値しない）を投票します。

あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名（接頭Image:を含む）を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー＆ペーストします。

あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。

• 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
• その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク（画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています）。
• あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。

次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}

1. 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後（下記タイムテーブル参照）に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。１０日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
2. 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
3. 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
4. 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
5. 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
6. 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" （推薦を取り下げます）と書くか、テンプレート {{withdraw|~~~~}} を加えます。
7. ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト（将来的なプロジェクト含む）に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
8. 推薦日から数えて５日間支持を受けられなかった画像（推薦者票含まず）は候補リストから外されます。（下記タイムテーブル参照）
9. テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。

候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。

1. 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
2. 最低５票以上の支持票を得ている。
3. 支持：反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
4. ２つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。

除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後５日間で提出者以外の  Delist （ Oppose）票が得られなかった候補は、５日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。

常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。

どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。

それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。

• 候補リストの編集はこちら：Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
• 日付順秀逸な画像リスト：Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
• 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ：Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
• 推薦・投票の完了方法：Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
• 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
• 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
• Photography critiques（画像評論）
• Help:スキャニング

purge this page's cache

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Strophariaceae
•  Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 04:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
•  Info Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. Particularly at the Cathedral of St. Peter and the Dom.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Unfavorable weather conditions. With the mist in the background, the main subject seems to be the white building popping up in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 00:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
•  Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
•  Info Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Found him. --Zzzs (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Fish Are Friends. Not Food. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Light, color and carpet -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --C messier (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support You just found Neno! ★ 14:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
•  Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Outstanding. Bird POTY. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Strong support I concur with Charles --Zzzs (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Harmonious in every way; words are actually superfluous. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Striking colours and composition, exceptionally detailed. --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ermell (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Strong support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
•  Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
•  Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• @The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
•  Info Lives alongside the other blue starling recently nominated. No current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I would go for a bit more contrasty tonality, as current tonality is dream like, but still a well executed image of a beautiful bird. --C messier (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I over-brightened when I uploaded the second version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support I was planning on nominating this. Thank you. --Zzzs (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Iridescent plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ermell (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
•  Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
•  Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• {{Oppose}} Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
•  Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
•  Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A classic Kabelleger's style! ★ 18:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, not really; never seen one of his like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Is this is a protected area of Tunisia for WLE 2024? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I said "style". ★ 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes ;Gorges de Selja Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: noise level is a bit high, I think; would support if denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks, I wasn't paying attention, I fixed that :) Skander zarrad (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Neutral The people captured in the picture aren't doing anything interesting. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - The people don't bother me. —Bruce1ee^talk 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
•  Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
•  Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Unusual close-up view of the Elizabeth Tower's clock face (aka Big Ben). -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I'm not convinced we should have this nice image as an FP as the clock face was recently restored and looks very different. I other words, it's one of many versions but not a particularly notable one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very sharp, good composition. even if the clock changed, why not featuring it before the change? Yann (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment For a perfect encyclopedia, we should ideally have one FP of every version of the clock face on such a notable building. What a great timeline that would make for the article. This excellent photo is a good start. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The file name and description could helpfully indicate it is a historical image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support: per Yann. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks for the nom ArionStar. Ermell (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Bummer that this image is outdated since the clocks were painted dark blue, but still good nonetheless. --Zzzs (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
•  Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
•  Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
•  Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 12:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
•  Info Kiwifruits from Italy in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  I withdraw my nomination Everyone is fed up with my fruit images. ★ 14:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What do you think about adding a rule so that once someone cancels a nomination they have to wait a while to be able to nominate another image? Wilfredor (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and it makes sense Wilfredor (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
•  Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
•  Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
•  Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical! Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
•  Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support good for 500 mm. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
•  Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I like it, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Breathtaking image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wow! ★ 18:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Clearly  Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 13:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
•  Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wow. Disclaimer: I so desperately miss this German custom. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This photo is fire! 🔥 ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 10:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
•  Info Finalist in Pesto Genovese contest - Pesto Genovese ingrideints. My work. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The whites are slightly overexposed, but it's a nice well executed photo El Golli Mohamed 11:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very good composition, educational and pleasing for the eye and reminding my tastebuds of pleasant things --Kritzolina (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Well done. --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment The focus stacking issues around the green leaves and above the pot are a bit distracting at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Basile Morin True and corrected. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Maybe one of your best food pictures, Mile. Thanks for sharing! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Frank Schulenburg Thanx, i do put more on food, so need to be good. We are low on "food photo". But i could not pass wining photo. Didnt have much time, flight next day. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Is that a joke by the jury? What's this winning picture all blurry, out of focus, poor light and distracting corner?! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Was wondering if they judge from smartphone. It is strange, yes. But some serious criteria "foreign jury" as first. --Mile (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Overall, well done. Listing the represented ingredients is a definite plus. If I were trying to imrprove this arrangement, a little higher camera perspective and gathering the ingredients more tightly together would let you move in tighter and strengthen the impact. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
•  Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
•  Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is mildly not distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
•  Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
•  Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards the Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
•  Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean? Tedder (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose VI since there is historical value, not FP since there is no wow. --Milseburg (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 22:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
•  Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo, sharpness not good. -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  For which, Frank? The 'authoritative' "This is not the style of wildlife photography", or the reasonable assumption: "The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus". Many just means a large number, such as, say 25,000. You have 25,000,000 wildlife photographers in the USA, so I am guessing, I admit, that 1 in 1000 tries to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice dynamic pose. --C messier (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
•  Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral Nice but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry the head is overprocessed. You may have tried adding sharpness but it gives a weird result.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 06:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
•  Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Abstain -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Interesting subject but a bit too "static"" IMO, likely because of the row of trees. Also, it lacks of dramatic atmosphere. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose Quality image but limited wow factor in my view. The lower part with the half cut reflection is not very successful, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I'd say the water vapor casting shadows is very impressive looking Henrysz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Strophariaceae
•  Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 04:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
•  Info Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. Particularly at the Cathedral of St. Peter and the Dom.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Unfavorable weather conditions. With the mist in the background, the main subject seems to be the white building popping up in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 00:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
•  Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
•  Info Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Found him. --Zzzs (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Fish Are Friends. Not Food. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Light, color and carpet -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --C messier (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support You just found Neno! ★ 14:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
•  Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Outstanding. Bird POTY. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Strong support I concur with Charles --Zzzs (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Harmonious in every way; words are actually superfluous. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Striking colours and composition, exceptionally detailed. --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ermell (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Strong support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
•  Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
•  Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• @The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
•  Info Lives alongside the other blue starling recently nominated. No current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I would go for a bit more contrasty tonality, as current tonality is dream like, but still a well executed image of a beautiful bird. --C messier (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I over-brightened when I uploaded the second version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support I was planning on nominating this. Thank you. --Zzzs (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Iridescent plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ermell (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
•  Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
•  Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• {{Oppose}} Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
•  Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
•  Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A classic Kabelleger's style! ★ 18:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, not really; never seen one of his like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Is this is a protected area of Tunisia for WLE 2024? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I said "style". ★ 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes ;Gorges de Selja Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: noise level is a bit high, I think; would support if denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks, I wasn't paying attention, I fixed that :) Skander zarrad (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Neutral The people captured in the picture aren't doing anything interesting. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - The people don't bother me. —Bruce1ee^talk 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
•  Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
•  Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Unusual close-up view of the Elizabeth Tower's clock face (aka Big Ben). -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I'm not convinced we should have this nice image as an FP as the clock face was recently restored and looks very different. I other words, it's one of many versions but not a particularly notable one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very sharp, good composition. even if the clock changed, why not featuring it before the change? Yann (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment For a perfect encyclopedia, we should ideally have one FP of every version of the clock face on such a notable building. What a great timeline that would make for the article. This excellent photo is a good start. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The file name and description could helpfully indicate it is a historical image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support: per Yann. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks for the nom ArionStar. Ermell (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Bummer that this image is outdated since the clocks were painted dark blue, but still good nonetheless. --Zzzs (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
•  Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
•  Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
•  Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 12:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
•  Info Kiwifruits from Italy in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  I withdraw my nomination Everyone is fed up with my fruit images. ★ 14:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What do you think about adding a rule so that once someone cancels a nomination they have to wait a while to be able to nominate another image? Wilfredor (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and it makes sense Wilfredor (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
•  Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
•  Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
•  Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical! Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
•  Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support good for 500 mm. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
•  Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I like it, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Breathtaking image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wow! ★ 18:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Clearly  Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 13:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
•  Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wow. Disclaimer: I so desperately miss this German custom. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This photo is fire! 🔥 ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 10:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
•  Info Finalist in Pesto Genovese contest - Pesto Genovese ingrideints. My work. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The whites are slightly overexposed, but it's a nice well executed photo El Golli Mohamed 11:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very good composition, educational and pleasing for the eye and reminding my tastebuds of pleasant things --Kritzolina (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Well done. --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment The focus stacking issues around the green leaves and above the pot are a bit distracting at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Basile Morin True and corrected. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Maybe one of your best food pictures, Mile. Thanks for sharing! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Frank Schulenburg Thanx, i do put more on food, so need to be good. We are low on "food photo". But i could not pass wining photo. Didnt have much time, flight next day. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Is that a joke by the jury? What's this winning picture all blurry, out of focus, poor light and distracting corner?! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Was wondering if they judge from smartphone. It is strange, yes. But some serious criteria "foreign jury" as first. --Mile (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Overall, well done. Listing the represented ingredients is a definite plus. If I were trying to imrprove this arrangement, a little higher camera perspective and gathering the ingredients more tightly together would let you move in tighter and strengthen the impact. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
•  Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
•  Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is mildly not distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
•  Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
•  Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards the Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
•  Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean? Tedder (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose VI since there is historical value, not FP since there is no wow. --Milseburg (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 22:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
•  Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo, sharpness not good. -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  For which, Frank? The 'authoritative' "This is not the style of wildlife photography", or the reasonable assumption: "The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus". Many just means a large number, such as, say 25,000. You have 25,000,000 wildlife photographers in the USA, so I am guessing, I admit, that 1 in 1000 tries to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice dynamic pose. --C messier (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
•  Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral Nice but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry the head is overprocessed. You may have tried adding sharpness but it gives a weird result.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 06:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
•  Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Abstain -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Interesting subject but a bit too "static"" IMO, likely because of the row of trees. Also, it lacks of dramatic atmosphere. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose Quality image but limited wow factor in my view. The lower part with the half cut reflection is not very successful, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I'd say the water vapor casting shadows is very impressive looking Henrysz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sun 23 Jun → Fri 28 Jun
Mon 24 Jun → Sat 29 Jun
Tue 25 Jun → Sun 30 Jun
Wed 26 Jun → Mon 01 Jul
Thu 27 Jun → Tue 02 Jul
Fri 28 Jun → Wed 03 Jul

Tue 18 Jun → Fri 28 Jun
Wed 19 Jun → Sat 29 Jun
Thu 20 Jun → Sun 30 Jun
Fri 21 Jun → Mon 01 Jul
Sat 22 Jun → Tue 02 Jul
Sun 23 Jun → Wed 03 Jul
Mon 24 Jun → Thu 04 Jul
Tue 25 Jun → Fri 05 Jul
Wed 26 Jun → Sat 06 Jul
Thu 27 Jun → Sun 07 Jul
Fri 28 Jun → Mon 08 Jul