Eupatorium

Archives

0 1 2 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hello again, I would appreciate you not making personal attacks and being uncivil towards me. We can disagree and be respectful at the same time.The One I Left (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe anything I've said or done has been less respectful than disregarding opposing views by constantly changing the scope of a discussion to fit my proposal or misrepresenting sources and policies. Feel free to report me for any conduct you believe to be egregious. KyleJoan 13:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been constantly hostile and disrespectful towards me. I'm just sending you a reminder to be more thoughtful and civil when you engage with other users. Goodbye.The One I Left (talk) 13:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I be more thoughtful about prioritizing my editorial bias over what sources say? I'll pass. KyleJoan 13:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? I'm just saying you can make your point without being hostile and disrespectful. I hope you can do that. Thanks.The One I Left (talk) 13:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm saying you can make your point without involving your editorial bias. I hope you can do that. KyleJoan 13:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I was baffled since there is no sourced material on her page which cite examples of her being a journalist. Anyway have a good day and goodbyeThe One I Left (talk) 13:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That has more to do with what you consider (not) to be journalism than the material itself. There's that editorial bias again. Good day to you as well. KyleJoan 13:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I think thats a worthy discussion. Is what she does considered journalism? What are the barometers of Journalism? Anyway yes Good day.The One I Left (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any user's personal beliefs about what constitutes any profession has nothing to do with the fact that the sources we have overwhelmingly describe Hostin as a journalist. Your rationale could be used to favor excluding "singer" from BLPs' first sentences if the subject has been documented as having lip synced. Whether you recognize how inappropriate that would be, please stop wasting everyone's time with this. KyleJoan 14:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget about civility please. GoodbyeThe One I Left (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is perfectly civil to make relevant, straightforward, policy-compliant points. If that's an issue for you, like I said, you might be on the wrong platform. Keep saying goodbye and then writing another comment if you'd like. KyleJoan 15:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are being needlessly insulting, snarky and disrespectful. Be mindful of what you say please! This is my final word but I'm sure you'll respond to this with some snarky or uncivil comment.The One I Left (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers to your final word not resulting in a consensus that favors your proposed change to Sunny Hostin! I'm glad we aren't wasting more time on asking you to provide sources. KyleJoan 15:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I don't see that consensus on the noticeboard.The One I Left (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. It doesn't exist. Keep wasting your own time. KyleJoan 16:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why did you revert my edit on jake gyllenhaal, i just added the category that he won and was nominated for.

it just said BAFTA Award and Academy Award, before but i added what exact category he won and was nominated for, BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role and Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.

i thought that was something necessary to include, rather than just Academy Award and BAFTA Award, as there any MANY categories of each, why not just specify the exact category? Samuelloveslennonstella (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it adds unnecessary length. Perhaps more important than that, you linked the category and simply piped that link as "BAFTA", which is too astonishing. He's an actor, so if he was nominated for a film award, the standard deduction would be that it was for his acting work. I doubt that a lot of casual readers would leap and presume that it's for costume design. Aren't you often reverted for making unnecessary changes to lead sections? That seems to be more of a cause for concern than this one revert. KyleJoan 18:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a third person re-added the information using the same source as I did I have re-added the change of name. Though I have attempted to address your concerns by swapping the names to have the petitioned for name as not the name displayed and to make clear the petition has yet to be ruled upon. PicturePerfect666 (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, well I'm contacting you here because I think it's better to discuss here than to go to the article, make the edit again and have it reversed, I think it would end up generating an edit war. So let's discuss here. Well, in addition to having Sam's date of birth on Apple Music, there is also a Tweet that he made in 2014 where he said the following: "Just found out that I share my birthday with Al Pacino. #Crease #Belte". Al Pacino, according to his Wikipedia page, was born on April 25, 1940. Logically, Sam Fender was not born in 1940, so we can only conclude that he was born on April 25.

Other Sources: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

• A post from Sam Fender on Instagram thanking for the birthday wishes he received, the post was made on April 26th (one day later of his supposed birthday).

Well, take a look at everything and see if that's enough. --Damitinha (talk) 01:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Damitinha. I don't believe we'd interacted prior to this, so it's nice to meet you. I believe the Official Charts Company and MYP are appropriate sources to support his birthdate, so feel free to add it (per MOS:DOB, please format it this way: 25 April 1994) alongside those two sources now. Thank you for this. KyleJoan 03:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you very much for the answer. I added the birthdate to the article with the sources you suggested. Thanks again, and have a great day. Damitinha (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering why you've been removing the language parameter from some references, such as on Andrew Garfield. It has a negligible impact on page size, provides valuable metadata, and does not display the language in the article if set to English so I'm puzzled as to why you are removing this parameter. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 18:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adam Black. Please see this discussion. The parameter, with its inconsistent use and invisibility in the general display, helps only editors seeking to translate and, more importantly, no readers. Three "language=en" out of 149 refs on Garfield does not suggest high metadata value. Essentially, the article's quality neither improves with the parameter's use nor suffers due to its removal. KyleJoan 02:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gerda Arendt. This is very cool and kind of you. KyleJoan 08:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]