| Elections in North Carolina |
|---|
 |
The 1952 United States presidential election in North Carolina took place on November 4, 1952, as part of the 1952 United States presidential election. North Carolina voters chose 14[3] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
As a former Confederate state, North Carolina had a history of Jim Crow laws, disfranchisement of its African-American population and dominance of the Democratic Party in state politics. However, unlike the Deep South, the Republican Party had sufficient historic Unionist white support from the mountains and northwestern Piedmont to gain one-third of the statewide vote total in most general elections,[4] where turnout was higher than elsewhere in the former Confederacy due substantially to the state's early abolition of the poll tax in 1920.[5] Like Virginia, Tennessee and Oklahoma, the relative strength of Republican opposition meant that North Carolina did not have statewide white primaries, although certain counties did use the white primary.[6] This persistent local Republican threat from mountain Unionist descendants meant that there was never any question of the state Democratic party bolting to support Strom Thurmond.[7][8] Additionally, the greatest support for Thurmond was found in middle- and upper-class urban areas of the Piedmont,[9] so that the best Dixiecrat counties correlated strongly with the largest urban areas.[10]
During Truman's second term, there was little satisfaction in North Carolina with the President, due to unresolved Civil Rights struggles, strikes, and evidence of corruption in the Democratic Party.[11] At the beginning of the presidential campaign, though, there was no indication that the state would not back new Democratic nominee Adlai Stevenson, and all state Democrats endorsed him.[12] Stevenson began his campaign in North Carolina in late July,[13] but did not return to the state as it was felt by September that Republican nominee and Columbia University President Dwight D. Eisenhower had less chance than in Florida, Texas or the Dixiecrat states of Louisiana and South Carolina.[14] Stevenson was helped by the fact that, much more than in other Southern States, North Carolina's press largely endorsed him over Eisenhower,[14] although in mid-October one of the two largest papers was endorsing the Republican.[15] Nonetheless, polls ten days before the election suggested Stevenson was very likely to carry the state due to the party loyalty created by viable mountain and northwest Piedmont Republican opposition.[16]
Because the Black Belt of the state, unlike the economically conservative Black Belts of the Deep South, was economically more liberal than the Piedmont region where the establishment Democratic faction led since 1929 by O. Max Gardner was based,[17] its entirely white electorate stayed exceedingly loyal to Stevenson – much more so than the Black Belts of other Outer South states. This Democratic loyalty extended to the Outer Banks, which had been a center of anti-Catholic voting when Herbert Hoover carried the state in 1928,[10] so that apart from a seven-vote win in Brunswick County, every county Eisenhower carried was in the urban Piedmont or traditionally GOP mountains. Thus, unlike Texas, Florida and Virginia, urban middle-class Republican voting was inadequate to carry the state for Eisenhower.
North Carolina was ultimately won by Governor Stevenson with 53.91 percent of the popular vote, against Eisenhower with 46.09 percent of the popular vote.[18][19] Stevenson ran with Alabama Senator John Sparkman and Eisenhower with California Senator Richard Nixon.
Results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Adlai Stevenson | 652,803 | 53.91% | |
| Republican | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 558,107 | 46.09% | |
| Total votes | 1,210,910 | 100% | ||
Results by county
| County[20] | Adlai Stevenson Democratic |
Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican |
Margin | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Alamance | 13,402 | 54.06% | 11,388 | 45.94% | 2,014 | 8.12% | 24,790 |
| Alexander | 2,665 | 42.56% | 3,597 | 57.44% | -932 | -14.88% | 6,262 |
| Alleghany | 1,809 | 50.28% | 1,789 | 49.72% | 20 | 0.56% | 3,598 |
| Anson | 4,143 | 69.21% | 1,843 | 30.79% | 2,300 | 38.42% | 5,986 |
| Ashe | 4,536 | 49.85% | 4,563 | 50.15% | -27 | -0.30% | 9,099 |
| Avery | 964 | 20.56% | 3,725 | 79.44% | -2,761 | -58.88% | 4,689 |
| Beaufort | 5,429 | 69.31% | 2,404 | 30.69% | 3,025 | 38.62% | 7,833 |
| Bertie | 3,557 | 90.26% | 384 | 9.74% | 3,173 | 80.52% | 3,941 |
| Bladen | 3,506 | 67.22% | 1,710 | 32.78% | 1,796 | 34.44% | 5,216 |
| Brunswick | 2,951 | 49.94% | 2,958 | 50.06% | -7 | -0.12% | 5,909 |
| Buncombe | 22,425 | 47.85% | 24,444 | 52.15% | -2,019 | -4.30% | 46,869 |
| Burke | 7,732 | 41.03% | 11,113 | 58.97% | -3,381 | -17.94% | 18,845 |
| Cabarrus | 9,140 | 37.78% | 15,053 | 62.22% | -5,913 | -24.44% | 24,193 |
| Caldwell | 7,533 | 45.13% | 9,160 | 54.87% | -1,627 | -9.74% | 16,693 |
| Camden | 996 | 74.55% | 340 | 25.45% | 656 | 49.10% | 1,336 |
| Carteret | 4,280 | 59.06% | 2,967 | 40.94% | 1,313 | 18.12% | 7,247 |
| Caswell | 2,597 | 72.75% | 973 | 27.25% | 1,624 | 45.50% | 3,570 |
| Catawba | 11,554 | 40.73% | 16,814 | 59.27% | -5,260 | -18.54% | 28,368 |
| Chatham | 4,303 | 54.41% | 3,606 | 45.59% | 697 | 8.82% | 7,909 |
| Cherokee | 3,363 | 51.02% | 3,228 | 48.98% | 135 | 2.04% | 6,591 |
| Chowan | 1,448 | 72.95% | 537 | 27.05% | 911 | 45.90% | 1,985 |
| Clay | 1,439 | 49.93% | 1,443 | 50.07% | -4 | -0.14% | 2,882 |
| Cleveland | 9,709 | 56.07% | 7,606 | 43.93% | 2,103 | 12.14% | 17,315 |
| Columbus | 6,941 | 69.81% | 3,001 | 30.19% | 3,940 | 39.62% | 9,942 |
| Craven | 6,092 | 68.34% | 2,822 | 31.66% | 3,270 | 36.68% | 8,914 |
| Cumberland | 8,839 | 54.18% | 7,474 | 45.82% | 1,365 | 8.36% | 16,313 |
| Currituck | 1,471 | 78.04% | 414 | 21.96% | 1,057 | 56.08% | 1,885 |
| Dare | 959 | 55.56% | 767 | 44.44% | 192 | 11.12% | 1,726 |
| Davidson | 10,931 | 43.33% | 14,299 | 56.67% | -3,368 | -13.34% | 25,230 |
| Davie | 2,406 | 37.50% | 4,010 | 62.50% | -1,604 | -25.00% | 6,416 |
| Duplin | 6,392 | 75.14% | 2,115 | 24.86% | 4,277 | 50.28% | 8,507 |
| Durham | 18,897 | 62.58% | 11,301 | 37.42% | 7,596 | 25.16% | 30,198 |
| Edgecombe | 8,504 | 81.53% | 1,927 | 18.47% | 6,577 | 63.06% | 10,431 |
| Forsyth | 24,535 | 48.14% | 26,436 | 51.86% | -1,901 | -3.72% | 50,971 |
| Franklin | 5,376 | 87.90% | 740 | 12.10% | 4,636 | 75.80% | 6,116 |
| Gaston | 17,781 | 48.14% | 19,157 | 51.86% | -1,376 | -3.72% | 36,938 |
| Gates | 1,247 | 77.41% | 364 | 22.59% | 883 | 54.82% | 1,611 |
| Graham | 1,590 | 53.54% | 1,380 | 46.46% | 210 | 7.08% | 2,970 |
| Granville | 4,583 | 79.72% | 1,166 | 20.28% | 3,417 | 59.44% | 5,749 |
| Greene | 2,976 | 94.12% | 186 | 5.88% | 2,790 | 88.24% | 3,162 |
| Guilford | 29,028 | 46.57% | 33,310 | 53.43% | -4,282 | -6.86% | 62,338 |
| Halifax | 8,807 | 79.94% | 2,210 | 20.06% | 6,597 | 59.88% | 11,017 |
| Harnett | 7,595 | 63.82% | 4,306 | 36.18% | 3,289 | 27.64% | 11,901 |
| Haywood | 8,761 | 58.86% | 6,124 | 41.14% | 2,637 | 17.72% | 14,885 |
| Henderson | 3,803 | 30.25% | 8,768 | 69.75% | -4,965 | -39.50% | 12,571 |
| Hertford | 2,859 | 83.16% | 579 | 16.84% | 2,280 | 66.32% | 3,438 |
| Hoke | 1,761 | 74.08% | 616 | 25.92% | 1,145 | 48.16% | 2,377 |
| Hyde | 919 | 69.36% | 406 | 30.64% | 513 | 38.72% | 1,325 |
| Iredell | 8,580 | 42.09% | 11,804 | 57.91% | -3,224 | -15.82% | 20,384 |
| Jackson | 4,296 | 53.86% | 3,680 | 46.14% | 616 | 7.72% | 7,976 |
| Johnston | 9,997 | 64.81% | 5,429 | 35.19% | 4,568 | 29.62% | 15,426 |
| Jones | 1,673 | 83.48% | 331 | 16.52% | 1,342 | 66.96% | 2,004 |
| Lee | 4,688 | 69.01% | 2,105 | 30.99% | 2,583 | 38.02% | 6,793 |
| Lenoir | 6,723 | 75.07% | 2,233 | 24.93% | 4,490 | 50.14% | 8,956 |
| Lincoln | 5,389 | 46.39% | 6,228 | 53.61% | -839 | -7.22% | 11,617 |
| Macon | 3,396 | 50.51% | 3,327 | 49.49% | 69 | 1.02% | 6,723 |
| Madison | 3,666 | 43.55% | 4,751 | 56.45% | -1,085 | -12.90% | 8,417 |
| Martin | 5,493 | 92.98% | 415 | 7.02% | 5,078 | 85.96% | 5,908 |
| McDowell | 4,755 | 50.24% | 4,710 | 49.76% | 45 | 0.48% | 9,465 |
| Mecklenburg | 33,044 | 42.70% | 44,334 | 57.30% | -11,290 | -14.60% | 77,378 |
| Mitchell | 1,236 | 23.57% | 4,009 | 76.43% | -2,773 | -52.86% | 5,245 |
| Montgomery | 3,176 | 49.96% | 3,181 | 50.04% | -5 | -0.08% | 6,357 |
| Moore | 5,066 | 48.21% | 5,442 | 51.79% | -376 | -3.58% | 10,508 |
| Nash | 10,424 | 79.82% | 2,636 | 20.18% | 7,788 | 59.64% | 13,060 |
| New Hanover | 10,330 | 52.54% | 9,330 | 47.46% | 1,000 | 5.08% | 19,660 |
| Northampton | 4,334 | 88.14% | 583 | 11.86% | 3,751 | 76.28% | 4,917 |
| Onslow | 4,275 | 77.22% | 1,261 | 22.78% | 3,014 | 54.44% | 5,536 |
| Orange | 5,156 | 57.49% | 3,813 | 42.51% | 1,343 | 14.98% | 8,969 |
| Pamlico | 1,428 | 61.26% | 903 | 38.74% | 525 | 22.52% | 2,331 |
| Pasquotank | 3,579 | 63.01% | 2,101 | 36.99% | 1,478 | 26.02% | 5,680 |
| Pender | 2,029 | 63.78% | 1,152 | 36.22% | 877 | 27.56% | 3,181 |
| Perquimans | 1,245 | 65.91% | 644 | 34.09% | 601 | 31.82% | 1,889 |
| Person | 4,266 | 75.64% | 1,374 | 24.36% | 2,892 | 51.28% | 5,640 |
| Pitt | 11,271 | 83.65% | 2,203 | 16.35% | 9,068 | 67.30% | 13,474 |
| Polk | 2,741 | 51.70% | 2,561 | 48.30% | 180 | 3.40% | 5,302 |
| Randolph | 8,975 | 41.93% | 12,429 | 58.07% | -3,454 | -16.14% | 21,404 |
| Richmond | 7,340 | 68.59% | 3,361 | 31.41% | 3,979 | 37.18% | 10,701 |
| Robeson | 9,311 | 69.29% | 4,127 | 30.71% | 5,184 | 38.58% | 13,438 |
| Rockingham | 12,423 | 64.34% | 6,885 | 35.66% | 5,538 | 28.68% | 19,308 |
| Rowan | 11,296 | 39.18% | 17,535 | 60.82% | -6,239 | -21.64% | 28,831 |
| Rutherford | 7,755 | 48.04% | 8,387 | 51.96% | -632 | -3.92% | 16,142 |
| Sampson | 6,956 | 51.89% | 6,449 | 48.11% | 507 | 3.78% | 13,405 |
| Scotland | 2,912 | 64.68% | 1,590 | 35.32% | 1,322 | 29.36% | 4,502 |
| Stanly | 7,202 | 41.64% | 10,093 | 58.36% | -2,891 | -16.72% | 17,295 |
| Stokes | 4,504 | 54.29% | 3,792 | 45.71% | 712 | 8.58% | 8,296 |
| Surry | 8,206 | 51.95% | 7,591 | 48.05% | 615 | 3.90% | 15,797 |
| Swain | 1,949 | 53.71% | 1,680 | 46.29% | 269 | 7.42% | 3,629 |
| Transylvania | 3,641 | 47.36% | 4,047 | 52.64% | -406 | -5.28% | 7,688 |
| Tyrrell | 916 | 70.41% | 385 | 29.59% | 531 | 40.82% | 1,301 |
| Union | 7,416 | 66.18% | 3,790 | 33.82% | 3,626 | 32.36% | 11,206 |
| Vance | 5,697 | 76.80% | 1,721 | 23.20% | 3,976 | 53.60% | 7,418 |
| Wake | 23,393 | 60.84% | 15,057 | 39.16% | 8,336 | 21.68% | 38,450 |
| Warren | 2,960 | 81.68% | 664 | 18.32% | 2,296 | 63.36% | 3,624 |
| Washington | 1,974 | 71.83% | 774 | 28.17% | 1,200 | 43.66% | 2,748 |
| Watauga | 3,600 | 44.30% | 4,527 | 55.70% | -927 | -11.40% | 8,127 |
| Wayne | 7,281 | 60.96% | 4,662 | 39.04% | 2,619 | 21.92% | 11,943 |
| Wilkes | 7,143 | 38.43% | 11,446 | 61.57% | -4,303 | -23.14% | 18,589 |
| Wilson | 8,684 | 77.17% | 2,569 | 22.83% | 6,115 | 54.34% | 11,253 |
| Yadkin | 2,786 | 33.46% | 5,540 | 66.54% | -2,754 | -33.08% | 8,326 |
| Yancey | 3,693 | 55.57% | 2,953 | 44.43% | 740 | 11.14% | 6,646 |
| Totals | 652,803 | 53.91% | 558,107 | 46.09% | 94,696 | 7.82% | 1,210,910 |
References
- ^ "United States Presidential election of 1952 - Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved July 25, 2017.
- ^ "U.S. presidential election, 1952". Facts on File. Archived from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
Eisenhower, born in Texas, considered a resident of New York, and headquartered at the time in Paris, finally decided to run for the Republican nomination
- ^ "1952 Election for the Forty-Second Term (1953-57)". Retrieved July 25, 2017.
- ^ Phillips, Kevin P. The Emerging Republican Majority. pp. 210, 242. ISBN 978-0-691-16324-6.
- ^ Key, Valdimer Orlando (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. Alfred A. Knopf. p. 502.
- ^ Klarman, Michael J. (2001). "The White Primary Rulings: A Case Study in the Consequences of Supreme Court Decision-Making". Florida State University Law Review. 29: 55–107.
- ^ Ader, Emile B. (August 1953). "Why the Dixiecrats Failed". The Journal of Politics. 15 (3): 356–369.
- ^ Guthrie, Paul Daniel (August 1955). The Dixiecrat Movement of 1948 (Thesis). Bowling Green State University. p. 183. Docket 144207.
- ^ Phillips. The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 297
- ^ a b See Strong, Donald S. (August 1955). "The Presidential Election in the South, 1952". The Journal of Politics. 17 (3): 343–389.
- ^ Grayson, A.G. (December 1975). "North Carolina and Harry Truman, 1944-1948". Journal of American Studies. 9 (3): 283–300.
- ^ "Dixie Sun Smiles on Eisenhower: Ike Could Win 79 Votes in South". Daily Boston Globe. August 3, 1952. p. C41.
- ^ "Democrats Expect To Win the South: Leaders Believe Sparkman Will Offset Eisenhower's Appeal to Dixie Bloc". The New York Times. July 27, 1952. p. 38.
- ^ a b "South not so Solid, Press Poll Hints: Survey by the A.P. Indicates Eisenhower Might "Pull" 3 to 5 States to G.O.P.". The New York Times. Associated Press. September 18, 1952. p. 19.
- ^ "Nominees Share 2 Papers: One in North Carolina Endorses Eisenhower, One Stevenson". The New York Times. October 12, 1952. p. 78.
- ^ Popham, John N. (October 24, 1952). "Party Fealty Firm in North Carolina: State Has Remained Regular During Fair Deal and Seems Likely to Do So No". The New York Times (Special to the New York Times ed.). p. 18.
- ^ Key. Southern Politics in State and Nation, pp. 215-217
- ^ "1952 Presidential General Election Results – North Carolina". Retrieved July 25, 2017.
- ^ "The American Presidency Project – Election of 1952". Retrieved July 25, 2017.
- ^ "NC US President Race, November 04, 1952". Our Campaigns.
Recent Comments