Agapanthus

Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs	0
RfBs	0
Overdue RfBs	0
Overdue RfAs	0
BRFAs	15
Approved BRFAs	0

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update

No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

It is 03:58:13 on August 2, 2024, according to the server's time and date.

Has anyone passed this boring disruption on to the WMF? Is there any point in it? Before the proxying there were IPs and of course CU on the accounts has real information--I don't know if the lawyers and sleuths at the Foundation act on those things. Drmies (talk) 21:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#So_what_are_we_doing_about_that_IP. I have taken no action here other than blocking some proxies. --Yamla (talk) 21:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing how this is a bureaucrat specific issue; is there something special that is needed from this team? — xaosflux ^Talk 23:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux I think Drmies is asking if the issue can be raised to the WMF. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The checkuser team (already mentioned) is under the auspices of arbcom, who has recurring meetings with WMF resources; the bureaucrat team has no such thing. So I'd suggest having the CU's escalate to arbcom if they need WMF support. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]